• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

" Since I'm dying of cancer now, I can tell my story. Please tell your readers about this, I cannot carry this to my grave. I videoed the explosion high up in WTC 2. There was no plane that I saw. There was no plane in the video, and if it came in from where we are told it did I had to have captured it. On the evening of Sept 11, two men in dark suits came to my door and told me they knew I had video of the events and I needed to give it to them. I at first complained, "who are you? " I asked. "The last people you will ever see before your death if you don't hand over the video. Speak to no one of this. Your camera will be returned tomorrow morning and as far as you are concerned its just as it was earlier today. Stick with this story for the next 10 years and you will win a state lottery, congratulations. Say anything to anyone about this meeting and you will die"
Well I have stayed quiet but my wife died last year, we didn't have kids and my parents and siblings all predeceased me before 2001. I have nothing to lose so I tell you this now. I also hand over the second copy of my original video so you can see that the planes were added later. I can die in peace"

This would be an excerpt from the expose of the massive operation to dub a plane in private videos of 9/11, except for the fact that such an expose does not exist.
 
jaydeehess said:
Floor pans hit directly by aircraft was bent and/or crushed by the momentum transfer.
Click to expand...
Momentum transfer are the words we are looking for indeed but also in the opposite direction. Upon impact the core received momentum from the other side and transferred it to floors. The floors transferred it to columns. The columns to your plane.


An engine core passed through WTC 1 (iirc) and landed in the street.
Click to expand...
Interesting.
Click to expand...
 
Mikeys said:
Momentum transfer are the words we are looking for indeed but also in the opposite direction. Upon impact the core received momentum from the other side and transferred it to floors. The floors transferred it to columns. The columns to your plane.


Interesting.
Click to expand...

What affect does the momentum transfer have on the parts of the plane and how they are joined?
 
LSSBB said:
What affect does the momentum transfer have on the parts of the plane and how they are joined?
Click to expand...

I believe he is attempting to argue the solid floors impacted tranferred the energy to the building columns which intern would have pushed back on the plane.

It's a flawed hypothesis...well, it's not even a hypothesis as it's not rooted in reality.
 
LogicallyYours said:
Let's run with your fake videos claim.

1. How was a plane added to all the videos and photos, in the correct context of each camera location, angle, contrast, exposure, distance and and focus?

2. How were they added so quickly? Keep in mind, many of these appeared on the internet within just a few short hours after.

3. Why haven't the people who made their videos public, complained that their videos and photos have been altered?
Click to expand...
.
Didn't the second impact occur in the background of a live presentation discussing the first?
And then of course OBL did say that was the project.
And all of those people on the planes vanished from the planet in those impacts and the ones in the towers soon after.
 
LSSBB said:
What affect does the momentum transfer have on the parts of the plane and how they are joined?
Click to expand...

I would imagine a real plane to be dinner in this confrontation. 7 floor sections + columns + the core x 2 versus a Boeing.
 
Mikeys said:
I would imagine a real plane to be dinner in this confrontation. 7 floor sections + columns + the core x 2 versus a Boeing.
Click to expand...

...and it was... but, there are many solid parts of a plane (engines, landing gear, wheels....) traveling at 500mph...and those parts DID cause the damage we now know about...Not to mention, the fuel which exploded almost immediately...igniting fires on the affected floors. The impact of the crash knocked off fireproofing and severed a number of columns.

So, your bitch is really about things you don't understand or grasp.
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
jaydeehess said:
Momentum transfer are the words we are looking for indeed but also in the opposite direction. Upon impact the core received momentum from the other side and transferred it to floors. The floors transferred it to columns. The columns to your plane.


Interesting.
Click to expand...

LogicallyYours said:
I believe he is attempting to argue the solid floors impacted tranferred the energy to the building columns which intern would have pushed back on the plane.

It's a flawed hypothesis...well, it's not even a hypothesis as it's not rooted in reality.
Click to expand...

Is that what he is trying to say? Its hard to yell since its obvious he hasn't much of a clue in physics.
Click to expand...
 
Mikeys said:
I would imagine a real plane to be dinner in this confrontation. 7 floor sections + columns + the core x 2 versus a Boeing.
Click to expand...

If you are referring to which of the two would be more intact post collision then I agree and it is quite true that once everything came to a stop the aircraft was fairly shreded while the building suffered major damage mostly only proximate to the area of impact. At that point the building could have been repaired and brought back to full function. The same could not have been said of the plane.
It was the continued insults to the building that added enough cumulative damage to initiate collapse.
 
Mikeys said:
I would imagine a real plane to be dinner in this confrontation. 7 floor sections + columns + the core x 2 versus a Boeing.
Click to expand...

Wow, the hubris to think what you imagine has value. If you weren't being so disrespectful young man, your ability to rush ahead in the face of adverse facts would be amusing. Instead, what you are doing is just sad. You get why you'll never be taken seriously don't you? The fact you could spend a few minutes on YouTube to see how obviously wrong you are you hand wave away by deciding reality can't be right and call the evidence even you you should be able see fake is astounding. I'm not sure I've ever seen someone so dedicated to being wrong. You actually work at making yourself more wrong child. Why is that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom