Look at these two pics. You have a top view of a floor platform partially filled with concrete and a plane impact elevation. Sorry no sunset. How will you hide a whole plane inside that?
http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/images/photoalbum/10/WTCdesign.jpg
[qimg]http://www.911hoax.com/WTC_1_front.jpg[/qimg]
I'm trying to makes sense of your question. The plane had enough weight, mass combined with the speed it was traveling...it crashed INTO the WTC. It didn't penetrate the skin of the building completely intact....so, I'm not understanding your claim "hide a whole plane inside"?
Also, you need to adddress the issue of, if not a plane how the crash image of a plane was left on the face of the building, complete with bend in steel beams.
Can you see how the "no-planes" BULSH is just that?
Actually I noticed it myself soon after started researching a year or so ago so not everything parroting. Nobody seemed to have talked about it while I find it to be the most obvious evidence. I heard it on Fetzer recently. The guy is good. He fights like a lion to the last.
No bullets, no pumpkins. You have a frame structure just like the one on the photo above and try making a hole in it with a plane like object. Lock the ratios to reflect reality.
I have to agree with Logically Yours. Your arguement is incomprehensible. The ratio of
what to
what?
What effect are you speaking of?
Are you trying to say that the perimeter frame of the structure, backed by 4 inch thick concrete floor pans every 3 meters, would absorb and distribute the impact the way, for instance, a kevlar vest does for a bullet?
If so then you are horribly incorrect.
The plane hit the building, it tore through the exterior aluminum panels, it encountered the steel columns and began to be sliced by those columns. That slicing through the aircraft by the columns imparted energy to the columns which in turn bent those columns inward. The columns that bent far enough failed and tore away from the perimeter.
Most columns snapped well before the entirity of the aircraft had passed beyond the perimeter.
Floor pans hit directly by aircraft was bent and/or crushed by the momentum transfer.
Larger, denser consituents of the aircraft, engine cores, landing assembly, control surfaces and hydralic pumps, still carried a lot of momentum themsleves and did further damage to the core columns they encountered. One wheel assembly passed right through the building and had enough momentum to punch out a perimeter column panel. It fell to the street embedded in that panel.
An engine core passed through WTC 1 (iirc) and landed in the street.
There are witnesses to the parts landing in the street. There are pictures of them in the street.
Either you are woefully illiterate in physics and engineering, or you are a troll who knows full well that what he posts is nonsense and simply likes getting people to respond to him.
