9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

Anders Lindman said:
I have changed my view many times, from believing the official story, to more and more extreme conspiracy theories. But that basically all photos and videos of the 9/11 attacks are fake seems very doubtful to me. I think the videos were real, even the live ones, and that they just added computer graphics planes. Only a few seconds delay for the live videos.
Click to expand...
So did I since I started researching. I looked for anything meaty that could disprove complete video fakery and found nothing. You have fake planes and hundreds of fake amator videos and thousands of fake vicsims. What prevents you from admitting the live videos were also fake?
 
Mikeys said:
So did I since I started researching. I looked for anything meaty that could disprove complete video fakery and found nothing. You have fake planes and hundreds of fake amator videos and thousands of fake vicsims. What prevents you from admitting the live videos were also fake?
Click to expand...

Why don't you converse with Ace Baker who has (so far as I can see) made the most in-depth attempts to prove any and all videos showing planes to be fakes. Then talk with MirageMemories here on JREF (a truther who works in the television business in Toronto) and ask him why he isn't a no-planer

Working in the industry myself, I can tell you in a heartbeat the utterly fatal flaws in the 'theory' he likes to promote. However, I prefer to let him spin his web of fail. Talk with MM and address this post then

Fitz
 
Mikeys said:
So did I since I started researching. I looked for anything meaty that could disprove complete video fakery and found nothing. You have fake planes and hundreds of fake amator videos and thousands of fake vicsims. What prevents you from admitting the live videos were also fake?
Click to expand...

Wrong approach. You need to prove the fakery. No one needs to disprove your amateur guesses. Do you think that all your ideas are by default right unless proven wrong?
 
Mikeys said:
So did I since I started researching. I looked for anything meaty that could disprove complete video fakery and found nothing. You have fake planes and hundreds of fake amator videos and thousands of fake vicsims. What prevents you from admitting the live videos were also fake?
Click to expand...

So, your location is; Loonar Orbit? I would guess then that you consider yourself some kind of loon? Well, Merriam Webster lists the synonyms of a loon as: bug, crackbrain, crazy, fool, fruitcake, head case, loon, loony, maniac, nut, nutcase, nutter.
That would explain why you make the statements that you do. You know, the planes and everything involved on 911 were fake.
Hopefully, someday the loons will wake up and we can put carp like this to rest.
 
Being smart enough to see da troof about 911 doesn't seem to include the ability to use a spell checker.
 
Mikeys said:
So did I since I started researching. I looked for anything meaty that could disprove complete video fakery and found nothing. You have fake planes and hundreds of fake amator videos and thousands of fake vicsims. What prevents you from admitting the live videos were also fake?
Click to expand...

What prevents you from tracking down the digital imaging company who obviously manufactured these images? It should be easy as there weren't that many who could do that kind of CGI quality on the scale necessary. Not in 2001.

Should be real easy.
 
It has the cold hand of the CIA all over It.
I KNOW they took the original Zapruder film to Washington DC, altered and edited out all those shooters, and got it back to Dallas an hour after the shooting to be shown on Dallas tv!
This book read I told me that.
 
dafydd said:
Being smart enough to see da troof about 911 doesn't seem to include the ability to use a spell checker.
Click to expand...
Problem is that most spell checkers don't have context testing to see if they had identified the right word. So you see the wrong word properly spelled.

...But my comments may be carping criticism about crap issues.


:runaway
 
So twoofer electricians think that there are amateurs in electric motors?
 
The trouble with the no plane fantasies is it relies on technology that either does not exist or technology only a few had access to back then in 2001 and easily traced.
 
dafydd said:
So twoofer electricians think that there are amateurs in electric motors?
Click to expand...

Professionally they are called birdwatchers. The problem is there were more birdwatchers than birds that morning in New York. Many of them appear to have worked or were hired by media outlets or so the official story goes.
 
Mikeys said:
Professionally they are called birdwatchers. The problem is there were more birdwatchers than birds that morning in New York. Many of them appear to have worked or were hired by media outlets or so the official story goes.
Click to expand...

Were there amator birdwatchers as well? What your post means is anybody's guess.
 
The no plane claims are dumbed down fantasy, based on nothing. The 911 truth followers fail to think for themselves, adopting silly claims from the internet.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Source? Another failed dumbed down fantasy. Did you make this one up, or find it on the internet?
Click to expand...

You understood that post? You speak Twooferese very well. Does it take long to learn it? I suppose not, it has a very small vocabulary.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom