LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
Last edited:
Latest Bigfoot "evidence"
- Thread starter Deacondark
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bigfoot
- Status
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Bob Heironimous is the guy in the suit. He claims that, and his claim has been all but confirmed by his passing of a polygraph.
For sure, polygraphs tests are not 100% accurate, but they seem to be accurate enough for the FBI to require all applicants to pass one before they will be admitted. .
They can even be used in most states as evidence for probable cause.
Last edited:
River
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,962
Also you may want to include proof of the footprints being fake.
http://pgfhoax.blogspot.com/
As well as the beard growth on Patterson from the casting footage, to the displaying of the casts by the large tree footage which according to their story was filmed the same day at Bluff Creek. (Oct 20, 1967 according to their storyline)
captain koolaid
Muse
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2008
- Messages
- 538
By Roger the dodger and "Tonto" Bob. They couldn't help themselves. The cock and bull story can't support it. The cock and bull story can't even support the cock and bull story, let alone The Behemoth From Lunatic Creek. If they were smart they would have kept their mouths shut. But, they didn't.
Forget it, NL. It's Bigfoot town.
xblade
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 464
Reality.
Alan Lowey
Muse
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 736
FYI. 'Skunk ape' filmed in Mississippi woods. It's probably the best authentic looking footage I've ever seen. Not enough to get you skeptics thinking differently of course.
And yet still completely worthless as objective evidence. Too far away, no detail--an easy hoax for a guy in a cheap ape suit.
In other words, it lives up to the usual standard of bigfoot "evidence."
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
That was already posted and commented on in the DNA thread.
It's still ridiculously fake.
EHocking
Penultimate Amazing
Still, the E in JREF is being upheld here.
We certainly have discerned the level of credulity of a number[1] of posters here.
[1] 2 is a number
We certainly have discerned the level of credulity of a number[1] of posters here.
[1] 2 is a number
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Still, the E in JREF is being upheld here.
We certainly have discerned the level of credulity of a number[1] of posters here.
[1] 2 is a number
Yep. Figbooters are about the most credulous group of adults I have ever encountered.
As I mentioned in the other thread, do these people not know how to use the zoom on their cameras?
It's almost hard to believe. After the latest Sykes show, some of them believe the negative results were the fault of the "evil" production company slanting things, and others blame lamestream science not taking the subject seriously, testing unvetted samples, or even falsifying results. And of course there's the MiB faction certain that the gubmint is covering things up. Jesus Christ in a canoe, there are some that somehow imagine this latest debacle props up Melba Ketchum's (DVM) results. Somehow.
They absolutely cannot wrap their minds around no bigfoot.
Northern Lights
Muse
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 762
It was taken with an IPhone and he said it wasn't capable of zooming in.
Northern Lights
Muse
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 762
I disagree, but would really like to know why you see it as a fake.
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Wouldn't a better question be: Why does anyone see it as a Bigfoot?
Depends on the model. But that's not the point. The point is that every piece of bigfoot evidence seems to come with a built-in excuse.
Why is that?
Because there is no corresponding creature with which to compare. Monkey suits, well, there's a ton of those.
Unless you have a bigfoot we could take a gander at.
You don't, do you?
Correa Neto
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2003
- Messages
- 8,548
Why would someone fake footage of a guy taking a dump in the bushes?
dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
What about all the blob photos taken with devices that were capable of zooming? Are the bigfooters incapable of working out how to zoom?
I can zoom with my cheapo HTC (Android 2.2?).
Does a reasonable job.
They didn't zoom at all...
A bit like all those other ones.
- Status