Nominate Scary Stundies for October

It's from an article in the Economist, but I think it qualifies. From a free person on the land:

One member of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International argued that her car was not subject to motor-vehicle laws because it was “an ecclesiastical pursuit chariot”.
Click to expand...
 
carlitos said:
It's from an article in the Economist, but I think it qualifies. From a free person on the land:
One member of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International argued that her car was not subject to motor-vehicle laws because it was “an ecclesiastical pursuit chariot”.
Click to expand...

You see, that right there is why I should never be a judge. Anyone with an ounce of experience would respond by saying "you car is a motor vehicle and you are subject to traffic laws when operating it. I find you guilt of speeding. Next case." But if it were me, my curiosity would get the better of me and like a n00b, I would have to say "who or what exactly are you pursuing with your chariot?" And then the inmates would be running the asylum.
 
000063 said:
"Military grade holograms" that the military has never used?

Is this like how Truthers talk about "military-grade/style demolitions" when describing a type of alleged demolition that is completely unlike anything the military has ever done?
Click to expand...

These "military grade holograms" were used once, if you are a no-planer. ;)
 
They are like all the secret weapons that the Military never use in war, they just reserve them for 'False Flag' operations they can use as an excuse to have a war with the not secret weapons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom