Clayton Moore
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 7,508
I hope this was meant to be humor.![]()
I witnessed a Bush/neocon controlled court in New Haven.
I hope this was meant to be humor.![]()
I witnessed a Bush/neocon controlled court in New Haven.
I witnessed a Bush/neocon controlled court in New Haven.
I witnessed a Bush/neocon controlled court in New Haven.
I witnessed a Bush/neocon controlled court in New Haven.
Your evidence was?
Look it up.
Look it up.
I see you forgot to bring your arrows again.
Yep, he's got nothing.Clayton Moore said:Your evidence was?
Look it up.
Your evidence was?
CM noticed the bailiff had a Jewish sounding name.
The reality of guilt is the presentation of an ad hoc defense when no accusation is made or even hinted.
When it becomes a refrain injected out of the blue by multiple posters in multiple threads you can be darn sure there is a reason.
Have you ever considered that your reputation for Holocaust denial, which you proudly acknowledge in your forum signature, may be a factor in the accusations of antisemitism leveled toward you?
It's not really "out of the blue" when you constantly remind people that you consider the Holocaust to be "neoconservative" propaganda.
CM noticed the bailiff had a Jewish sounding name.
Have you ever considered that your reputation for Holocaust denial, which you proudly acknowledge in your forum signature, may be a factor in the accusations of antisemitism leveled toward you?
It's not really "out of the blue" when you constantly remind people that you consider the Holocaust to be "neoconservative" propaganda.
Originally Posted by Craig4 View Post
The above is out of the blue.
My signature is not part of the thread and doesn't grant "poetic license."
Revisionist.
The reality of guilt is the presentation of an ad hoc defense when no accusation is made or even hinted.
When it becomes a refrain injected out of the blue by multiple posters in multiple threads you can be darn sure there is a reason.
Look it up.
Looked over your posts and found a dearth of evidence. Where is your evidence that the court is/was biased in the manner you claim?