As always, my posts are perfectly clear and do not require tedious dissection or explanation.
To you maybe, but to others, not so much. I'll just start with post
5912 And then everyone can just scroll through the 20 or so posts so they get it all in chronological order and in complete context.
Need I repeat, Pup said that there aren't any scriptures for the hollow earth cause it's not. That was post 5917
Six posts later 5923 you post five D&C scriptures saying:
Section 29:14 and there shall be greater signs in heaven above and in the earth beneath;
Section 45:40 And they shall see signs and wonders, for they shall be shown forth in the heavens above, and in the earth beneath.
Section 88:79 Of things both in heaven and in the earth, and under the earth;
Section 84:100 The Lord hath brought down Zion from above. The Lord hath brought up Zion from beneath. 101 The earth hath travailed and brought forth her strength; And truth is established in her bowels;
Section 101:34 Things most precious, things that are above, and things that are beneath, things that are in the earth, and upon the earth, and in heaven.
So when pakeha responded in post 5926 by quoting the link to the scriptures you posted in 5923 asked if you were saying the hollow earth is part of LDS doctrine and you answered with post 5931 the D&C is doctrine, in effect you seem to be saying that you believe that the scriptures above
are are saying the earth is hollow. Therefore since they're in the D&C one can conclude that you're saying it's Church doctrine. Otherwise when everyone was asking, "
Do those scriptures mean to you that the Earth is hollow? If not then what do those scriptures mean and why did you post them?" You would have responded in the negative, but you omitted answering it, which is deceitful, in my opinion as it leads others to believe that that's what you meant.
So now I'm confused, you've made it sound even
more like you're saying the hollow earth is LDS doctrine than you were saying in your original post. So why did you say that I made a gross misrepresentation of your words, and why did you say "
[Cat Tale] refers to my words as if I am saying hollow earth is LDS doctrine, when of course I am saying nothing of the kind." You can't have it both ways. It either is, or it isn't. Which is it? Your posts are not always perfectly clear, at least not to me.
Discussions of actual LDS beliefs is fine... but posting nonsense as being LDS when it is not LDS is not.
