I made a post saying the money should be directed towards investigating the suppression of FBI agent Coleen Rowley via stand down orders. Someone complained it was off-topic, reported it and it was removed. I protest this. I think the post was entirely on-topic and answered the question in the original post. The question was "How should I spend it?" I gave a perfectly on-topic reasonable answer to that question that was unfairly removed in my opinion.
Furthermore, investigation of the allegations in Peter Lance's book 'Cover-Up' where FBI had pre-knowledge of Khalid Sheik Mohammed planning attacks using airliners should also be thoroughly scrutinized in relation to 9-11.
I believe the real evidence is more clearly seen in the circumstantial evidence surrounding the handling of the Al Qaeda suicide pilots. The operation was similar to Operation Northwoods, a documented and established government conspiracy, as precedent.
If you were a group of well financed terrorists who wanted kick sand in the face of the great satan... what would you do? Wouldn't a multiple plane hijacking using the planes as missiles be a rather easy one to pull off.. element of surprise... low tech and so forth?
Just because the concept of a false flag exists AND there have been false flags used many times in history to get a war going... does not mean that EVERY attack or insurgency is a false flag event.
You're imagination is flogging your thinking here. It might be but it doesn't look like it was. Yes it is possible that hawks inside the NSS getting wind of the intent to attack would welcome them because it would be the excuse then to attack back and they ALWAYS need provocation. Imperialism is a constant provocation to the colonies. They know it an expect it and try to rule with an iron first to intimidate the empire's serfs. History shows that sooner or later the serfs strike back and rebel... you can bank on it.
