New TWA Flight 800 film coming out

Just thought I'd check back in again to ask if anyone supporting the missile theory in regards to TWA 800 has yet explained why the forensic examination of the human remains recovered from the flight does not support the missile theory.

Because shaking bridge!
 
At the risk of derailing the thread, I might note that up until now, I never quite understood the draw of feeding a troll. It relieves the boredom of a slow work day.

[/offtopic]

Perhaps the forum should have a 'Troll baiting sub forum' where obvious trolls and those that like to bash them for hundreds of pages can do so in splendid isolation and take this off the 'serious' conspiracy page.
 
... proof of a missile explosion as witnessed by many persons inclusing the highly qualified VietNam veteran Fred Meyer.

Fred Meyer, highly qualified?

I have been privy to others conducting investigations whom I shall not name since I suspect that Bill Donaldson was murdered. (Fred Meyer)
Oops, Fred Meyer is not highly qualified, he highly paranoid and makes up stuff.

Bill Donaldson died of a brain tumor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Donaldson

Your web pages of woo are based on paranoid conspracy theorists who have no evidence. http://www.twa800.com/index.htm
 
If we ignore the silly responses the 32 degree outside temperature on Flight 800 at 13,000 feet would have condensed any alleged fuel vapors inside the center fuel tank. You know, aircraft have red hot exteriors from air friction, which is why lavatory ice chunks sometimes form from leaks.

An aviation wiring short circuit creates a very noticeable burn boil in the insulation jacket of the involved wires. There are many examples of such short circuits captured in photos. The Flight 800 investigation never turned-up any such burn boil in any wiring in its investigation.
So much wrong in a single post. Start with the question was 100% of the aircraft recovered? Then move along to does every short circuit cause the effects you claim?
 
Just thought I'd check back in again to ask if anyone supporting the missile theory in regards to TWA 800 has yet explained why the forensic examination of the human remains recovered from the flight does not support the missile theory.


There is the, of course, unsubstantiated claim that the FBI retrieved "pellets" from the bodies and a medical examiner identified the pellets as being composed of aluminum and other metal alloys.

There are only a few minor problems with that claim: if the FBI retrieved the pellets then the ME could not have analyzed them. The pellets went straight into the bodies without touching the fuselage or any of the surrounding seats, deck, or overhead bins. Anti-aircraft warheads don't use pellets. Anti-aircraft warheads don't use casings made out of aluminum. They're titanium or steel alloys.

Other than huge holes in the claim, breaking the laws of physics, and being inconsistent with every known warhead design, it is very compelling evidence for the existence of the Missile Fairy.
 
You're not answering the point about how government could admit the satellite caught Navy vessels but "failed" to catch a missile launch with its high-tech equipment?
It didn't. You are, as usual, wrong. Neither of the KH-11 satellites operational at the time of the crash were overhead.

The structure shaking was adequately witnessed by 3 separate people.
Irrelevant. The size of explosion necessary to cause the effect you claim happened would have destroyed the P-3 in the area and causes other effects.
Ergo it didn't happen.

If we ignore the silly responses the 32 degree outside temperature on Flight 800 at 13,000 feet would have condensed any alleged fuel vapors inside the center fuel tank.
Wrong, for the reasons give.

I'm back-pedaling?

Where's the Long Island Coroner's report or testimony?

Who's the submarine captain that was relieved of duty?

:id:
What about the supposed delay in the commissioning of the Wyoming (that didn't happen)?
What about The Mystery of the Missing Missile Tubes on the Albuquerque?


They failed to catch the missile launch because no missile launch happened. Most people wouldn't need to have that explained.
Well actually they weren't in place to see anything. Their orbits are known and it's easy to backtrack.

They are fallible because an AA missile 10 miles away wouldn't shake anything.
A Bomarc might.:D

You're assuming a Keyhole was over the crash site at the time of the crash. You're putting the cart before the horse. Keyhole's are surveillance satellites. Are they capable of detecting missile launches?
Well if a launch happened, and they were in position then, probably. Though cloud cover might interfere.

Yeah, the same Fred Meyer who said the lower limb of the Sun was on the horizon at the time of his sighting TWA 800 and, despite crafty editing of the videos of him retelling his account, just can't stretch it out long enough to cover the 42 seconds from the first explosion to the final fireball.
That's be the "infallible" Mr. Meyer.
:rolleyes:
 
Well yes but has JB investigated a supernatural explanation for the destruction of the aircraft?....I think not!

Between claiming infalliable witness who both saw the missile and DIDN'T see the missile he is right on the fast track to Troll contradiction heaven.

We wish him well.....lol
 
I wanted to make a joke about TWA, Lindbergh and Hitler... but some conspiracy theorist probably already has thought up a theory on this.
 
I wanted to make a joke about TWA, Lindbergh and Hitler... but some conspiracy theorist probably already has thought up a theory on this.

Hmmmm well you could say that Lindbergh's baby was the illegimate child of the then little known Hitler, but known by the evil PTB to be soon involved in the wars known as WWII. Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Jr was (under an assumed name) on that flight and was going to met with Nazi officials who would proclaim him the new Fuhrer and whisk him away to the Antarctic fortress to begin the IV Reich.

He had to be stopped.

Tada!
 
That is not nearly convoluted enough. You have to at least work in the suicide Cessna, 30 knot track, the speed of sound temporarily increasing a hundred-fold, two Suns (to account for the Infallible Fred Meyer saying the Sun was up), and CO of the Wyoming getting relieved.
 
That is not nearly convoluted enough. You have to at least work in the suicide Cessna, 30 knot track, the speed of sound temporarily increasing a hundred-fold, two Suns (to account for the Infallible Fred Meyer saying the Sun was up), and CO of the Wyoming getting relieved.

ALL DOTS MUST BE CONNECTED! THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES!!!1!11!

:D
 
That is not nearly convoluted enough. You have to at least work in the suicide Cessna, 30 knot track, the speed of sound temporarily increasing a hundred-fold, two Suns (to account for the Infallible Fred Meyer saying the Sun was up), and CO of the Wyoming getting relieved.

Don't forget the bridge and the house having the same resonant frequency, and shock waves now suddenly having frequencies at all.
 
To get all that in I do think we'll have to invoke the CT favourite fall backs - to create such a embracing theory we'll need a dead alien, a rogue cell of the NWO, a bald thespian Sasquatch, a recipe (in Farsi) for sweet and sour rutabaga and the skull of Phillip III of Macedonia.

Not to forget the Atlantean vase and a splinter from the true cross.

Wait a minute ------ there was not flight TWA 800, we need to reference the work of the no-planers too

It was all a fake, everything, even the reconstruction, no one died at all, all false.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom