The Central Scrutinizer
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2001
- Messages
- 53,097
I'd plow the girl to the right. Just sayin'...
And then what, "plant your seed"?
I'd plow the girl to the right. Just sayin'...
And then what, "plant your seed"?
If you were genetically modified then that wouldn't be a problem.Almost went that way, but didn't want to imply that I wanted to sire more hippies.
If you were genetically modified then that wouldn't be a problem.![]()
Of course, she could always buy her seeds from Monsanto.Touche!![]()
And then what, "plant your seed"?I'd plow the girl to the right. Just sayin'...
She kinda has that "Hot Donna" look (see That 70's Show) goin' on. I tried dating some hippie girls back in my youth, but I couldn't handle the marijuana smoke and patchouli oil.
If there was no concern of Monsanto products, then most EU countries wouldn't have them banned. If the foods were safe for consumption, then the most progressive nations on Earth wouldn't find fault with them. This isn't the case. What is it that Europeans are so scared of? It can't be nothing.
If there was no concern of Monsanto products, then most EU countries wouldn't have them banned.
Yes, it can. The Europeans are irrational on this issue, their opinions are contrary to the scientific evidence..
I think Central Scrutinizer said several pages ago, that she (I believe that is correct), never met an anti-GMO person who wasn't a liar and a deceiver. Yet if you paint such a broad stroke, I've yet to see a pro-GMO person who wasn't a liar and a deceiver. The truth is, if we paint such a broad picture we can't see the finer points. If there was no concern of Monsanto products, then most EU countries wouldn't have them banned. If the foods were safe for consumption, then the most progressive nations on Earth wouldn't find fault with them. This isn't the case. What is it that Europeans are so scared of? It can't be nothing.
Even if GM is all upside and no downside, tying your future to the whim of a (foreign) monopoly supplier might not be the best business strategy in the world.Politicians ignore science and listen to their Oprah-watching constituents. It's all about getting re-elected. I think part of it is also that Monsanto is huge and American.
Even if GM is all upside and no downside, tying your future to the whim of a (foreign) monopoly supplier might not be the best business strategy in the world.
Even if GM is all upside and no downside, tying your future to the whim of a (foreign) monopoly supplier might not be the best business strategy in the world.
A more sensible way of saying that is that if you become dependent on GM seeds then it may become uneconomic to try to revert back to the non-GM seeds.Yeah, because as we all know, once you use Monsanto seeds, you can't ever use anything else.
A more sensible way of saying that is that if you become dependent on GM seeds then it may become uneconomic to try to revert back to the non-GM seeds.
If your neighbour grows GM crops then you would probably have to do likewise to compete. If roundup resistant GM crops lead to the rise of super-insects, then it may no longer be feasible to use non-GM crops because they wouldn't be able to cope with the amount of roundup needed to control the evolved insects. Antibiotic resistant diseases didn't become a problem in hospitals until antibiotics were over-used.
A more sensible way of saying that is that if you become dependent on GM seeds then it may become uneconomic to try to revert back to the non-GM seeds.
If your neighbour grows GM crops then you would probably have to do likewise to compete. If roundup resistant GM crops lead to the rise of super-insects, then it may no longer be feasible to use non-GM crops because they wouldn't be able to cope with the amount of roundup needed to control the evolved insects. Antibiotic resistant diseases didn't become a problem in hospitals until antibiotics were over-used.