• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
What happened to "horse fell over/completely flat stirrup/stuck and hurt foot"?

What happened to all of the horses running away at the sight of Patty?

How does a true story just abandon it's original account?

If Patty stunk so bad, and the wind was such that Roger could smell it well, how did the horses not react well before coming into sight of Patty?
 
What happened to "horse fell over/completely flat stirrup/stuck and hurt foot"?

What happened to all of the horses running away at the sight of Patty?

How does a true story just abandon it's original account?

If Patty stunk so bad, and the wind was such that Roger could smell it well, how did the horses not react well before coming into sight of Patty?

My guess is that true believers would tell you that Roger probably lied about everything except the part about the monkey walking in front of his camera.
 
I honestly do not get why he did this. There CAN'T be much money in it.

Craig Woolheater just asked me to "like" his squatch it fb page.

No.
 
When someone in Bigfootery presents a wild claim, the first thing I like to do nowadays is check to see if they have any history of hoaxing.

This is worth discussing in the big picture. There may only be a handful of individuals who everyone (Bigfoot believers, Bigfoot skeptics and the rest of the world) fully agrees are/were hoaxers.

It's pretty much a guaranteed fact that Bigfoot hoaxers do not confess. So it's almost worthless to proceed (as you say) with the idea that a history of hoaxing can be useful in evaluating new claims.

I'd say that more than 99% of Bigfoot hoaxers are not universally identified as such by the Bigfooter community.

Patterson
Gimlin
Wallace
Freeman
Beck
Ostman

These men are not widely regarded as hoaxers within the Bigfooter community.

What is your list of hoaxers?
 
It might be too many to list. It goes all the way from Dyer to Ketchum to BFF's ex-chief admin. I'm considering creating some sort of list though at some point of who they are and what hoax they've committed. Perhaps a website. It's worth mentioning though that a few folks like Freeman and Dyer have confessed on TV, but people still believe them.

I believe there needs to be solid evidence of a hoax before labeling anyone. Claiming to have been kidnapped by Bigfoot might not be enough, but something like habituation with woodapes coming over for tea parties certainly is.
 

What about the people providing her with samples? No hoaxing there?


Go check the details of his "confession" again then report back on your findings.


I believe there needs to be solid evidence of a hoax before labeling anyone. Claiming to have been kidnapped by Bigfoot might not be enough...

Oh my. I guess your logic is that Bigfoot does exist and by golly it might kidnap a person. Continuing the logic would suggest that many others have been kidnapped by Bigfoot but never told anybody about it.
 
It might be too many to list. It goes all the way from Dyer to Ketchum to BFF's ex-chief admin. I'm considering creating some sort of list though at some point of who they are and what hoax they've committed. Perhaps a website. It's worth mentioning though that a few folks like Freeman and Dyer have confessed on TV, but people still believe them.

I believe there needs to be solid evidence of a hoax before labeling anyone. Claiming to have been kidnapped by Bigfoot might not be enough, but something like habituation with woodapes coming over for tea parties certainly is.

OS,
To keep from further derailing this thread please go to this one and comment on my question to you about these reports of bigfoot.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=252061
 
It might be too many to list. It goes all the way from Dyer to Ketchum to BFF's ex-chief admin. I'm considering creating some sort of list though at some point of who they are and what hoax they've committed. Perhaps a website. It's worth mentioning though that a few folks like Freeman and Dyer have confessed on TV, but people still believe them...


I know you won't put it in the "hoax" column, but, will you consider a second one for stuff like Roger the dodger's monster movie? You could label the category- "Pretty suss".


...I believe there needs to be solid evidence of a hoax before labeling anyone. Claiming to have been kidnapped by Bigfoot might not be enough, but something like habituation with woodapes coming over for tea parties certainly is.


Damn. I hope you're not dissing Janice Carter's Bigfoot fun park. Are you going to tell me that pooping in barns is weaker than VW wrestling? Janice Carter's b******* is every bit as good as Roger Patterson's b*******. Although Roger's has a more entertaining "monster" thing going on compared to Janice's lame cutesypoo stuff. Mind you, Janice did work in a Bigfoot rape angle. That's definitely a twist.
 
Last edited:
Its strange how a 46 year old film is still considered to be the best video evidence for a giant North American ape.
 
Its strange how a 46 year old film is still considered to be the best video evidence for a giant North American ape.

Yes, this farce is considered by many enthusiasts to be the best evidence for their cause. It's amazing (and strange) that they don't see the irony.
 
BobG is like a holy image in Bigfootery.

[qimg]http://bigfootgifs.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/bg-copy.gif[/qimg]

He'll look at anyone and tell them the truth about who was there that day.



Yeah, "there were only two people there THAT DAY." Refering to October 20th. He would be telling the truth regardless of the authenticity of the films subject. It is fairly well known by those who have studied this film and its circumstances that the film was most likely shot previous to their claimed date. (for many reasons) Gimlin is very careful about what he says publicly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom