Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[OneTime]

The no plane theory is the most intelligent one.

fyp

 

[TheRedWorm]

fyp


[qimg]http://i44.tinypic.com/wmbo5.gif[/qimg]

How is posting an image of an airplane crashing into a building supposed to show that no aircraft hit the buildings?

 

[WTC Dust]

How is posting an image of an airplane crashing into a building supposed to show that no aircraft hit the buildings?

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

 

[OneTime]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

Yes, you beat me to it.

It basically defies the laws of physics. But these plane huggers will have you believe that planes can just blend into buildings like that, and consequently cause the building to collapse due to a fire

 

[BazBear]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

I suspect your misuse of Newton's laws might cause him to spin in his grave like a rotisserie chicken.

 

[brazenlilraisin]

plane huggers will have you believe that planes can just blend into buildings like that, and consequently cause the building to collapse due to a fire

So out there I know. The no-planer 1 or 2 percent of the population are totally not nuts!

 

[abaddon]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

Again with the cartoon physics.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

Barking.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

Yes, you beat me to it.

It basically defies the laws of physics. But these plane huggers will have you believe that planes can just blend into buildings like that, and consequently cause the building to collapse due to a fire

Step AWAY from the cluesforum.


It'll make you stupid.

 

[OneTime]

Newton's 3rd Law
“ Lex III: Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi. ”
“ Law III: To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are directed in opposite directions. ”


There's nothing stupid about being perplexed when witnessing what is supposed to be a plane flying inside a building. If anything, you are being the stupid one, in thinking that a plane would do anything other than bounce off the building.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Why is it assumed that an oppossing reaction would cause any debris to bounce back? Do we live in a universe where bullets bounce of babies? Where I can knock the Earth out of orbit by spitting? Or it possible the reactive force slowed, but did not repell the large fast moving aircraft?

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

There's nothing stupid about being perplexed when witnessing what is supposed to be a plane flying inside a building.

My cat used to be perplexed when I'd leave the house by the front door, walk round the side of the house to get something from the car, then come back in through the kitchen door.


Eventually the cat figured it out

 

[dafydd]

Yes, you beat me to it.

It basically defies the laws of physics. But these plane huggers will have you believe that planes can just blend into buildings like that, and consequently cause the building to collapse due to a fire

Are you being serious?

 

[dafydd]

There's nothing stupid about being perplexed when witnessing what is supposed to be a plane flying inside a building. If anything, you are being the stupid one, in thinking that a plane would do anything other than bounce off the building.

So you're not being serious. Glad we sorted that one out.

 

[swright777]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.It's an inherent property of the universe.

It's regularly misunderstood and misapplied though. (See quoted text above ↑)

 

[R.A.F.]

If anything, you are being the stupid one, in thinking that a plane would do anything other than bounce off the building.

People died on those "imaginary" planes, and those who claim differently are just "dancing on their graves".

Talk about the lowest scum of the earth.

 

[R.A.F.]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

...and as a physicist, you make a great hair dresser.

 

[R.A.F.]

There's nothing stupid about being perplexed...

So you don't understand...we get that...

 

[abaddon]

Newton's 3rd Law
“ Lex III: Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes contrarias dirigi. ”
“ Law III: To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are directed in opposite directions. ”


There's nothing stupid about being perplexed when witnessing what is supposed to be a plane flying inside a building. If anything, you are being the stupid one, in thinking that a plane would do anything other than bounce off the building.

Cartoon physics for the win!!!

Stop. Just stop.

 

[Spindrift]

The lack of plane debris bouncing backwards off the south face
of WTC 2 indicates that this is not a collision between physical objects.

Newton's 3rd law isn't the kind of law that can be disobeyed.
It's an inherent property of the universe.

According to your version of Newton's 3rd law, it should be pretty much impossible for you to cut your food.