So just to be clear, once again my direct questions were not answered.
My thoughts are, that the two slab formed ruins have never exist, and where placed by Kubricks special effect teams into the scene.
If this fits, it will be a strong hint in my direction. If the ruined ground still exists, the two slab buildings must still be there.
So you didn't read the interview about how he could film there because it was due for demolition and redevelopment?
Figures.
Note the hilighted sentence.
Please TomTomkenT, stay honest. Do not draw that card of the victims. Beachnut made also the same psycho attack to pull me out of this discussion. This is not fair play.
So, what exactly is dishonest or psycho about pointing out that your argument has been worded in such a way -twice now- as to reduce the actual events down to staged entertainment?
We are all together clear about what happend to that innocent people. My intention is not to hurt the feelings of their familys. I said it already.
And yet you not only persist with the discussion as a way that has been pointed out to be in poor taste, but to now attack those who gently reminded you that you were on dubious ground. I am glad you have no concerns about keeping it classy.
Here is a pic, when he took the final scene, on the right side are the ruins and the marching marines, the two slab buildings must have been on the right side in the background, but there are only the "modern" quadratic towers of the city.
And how did you come to the conclusion these were the only structures in the
setting rather than the
set.
I found them in the pics coming from Spanx.(See the link)
So the "towers" are part of the ruins and not special effect.
So where are our two slabs. Are they a special effect ?
Er, you just said the buildings were right there. Remember? You know, those buildings you can see in the background which look monolithic because of lighting...
In the final scene, the 3 modern towers must be visible, but they disapeared because they does not fit to Huey city.
So they are visible, but invisible. Please do try to make sense about which structures you are talking about, and if they are visible or not.
He must had a special effect team, because the modern towers are disturbing the scene, also in other takes.
..
Well, we know there was a special effects team, because there were special effects. They didn't REALLY go around shooting people.
But you know, it doesn't take a special effects team for unlit structures not to be seen in a night time shoot. Or to appear monolithic.
So I am now going to assume that you chose not to answer my direct question because you know the answer. If the "twin towers" are a feature of the island, would the director have had to remove them to avoid sending your message, because you know full well that would mean your "message" can not be distinguished from unintended background detail.
I also note you have still offered nothing here that matches the "methodology" you posted a while back (eventually), you have not addressed the flaws with that methodlogy, or varified it with an academic source.
You have given no means by which the film maker could be aware of the future attack, or any way to distinguish this scene from any other film that also happened to feature two large blocky structures.
You are now ignoring that your "key" to the secene was text that you misrepresented and did NOT say "my town". You have offered no reason that text was intended to remind anybody of New York, or that it would remind anybody of New York except you.
Thank you kindly for wasting your final chance. My conversation with you is over.
