• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proving the Aurora Theater Shooting's official story false

Me and NoahFence and FrederickEason versus all of the rest of you.
 
Last edited:
Neveos said:
Me and NoahFence and FrederickEason versus all of the rest of you. We believe in the Illuminati! Down with the NWO! Stop the Reptillian invasion, my friends!
Click to expand...

Oh. So it is all racism against those who happen to be born cold blooded. :rolleyes:
 
Jack by the hedge said:
It seems to me there's a bannister rail a few inches below the top of that wall. What makes you imagine it was so tall?

Having overestimated its height by about 2 feet, do you also think it was designed to be bulletproof? What do you think the construction of that wall was? My guess would be drywall sheet on wooden studding.
Click to expand...
The construction is likely lighter than that. I've done these kinds of remodels.

The railing is a pipe rail that is covered by a light sound board (sometimes fabric covered). It's there to stop the trip hazard of someone getting their foot on the wrong side of the pipe and some people don't like to be able to see how far it is to the next flight.

It would offer no resistance to a bullet and if the bullet hits a pipe upright it could ricochet in any direction.

Has Neveos considered the issue of ricochet?
 
R.A.F. said:
Neveos said:
NoahFence said:
Neveos said:
Nothing quite says it better than:

"To the right of us, right by the stairwell, all 12 of us, heard hissing, and started seeing smoke, saw a/heard a boom and a flash, we heard what we thought were fire crackers, we thought kids were throwing fire crackers"

ETA:

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Click to expand...
Congratulations. You found a quote from someone describing a smoke grenade in a place where a smoke grenade went off.

Amazing work.
Click to expand...
AHHHH, a new ally. Welcome to the cause!
Click to expand...
I see we need to add sarcasm to this list of things you do not understand...sheesh...
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Jack by the hedge said:
It seems to me there's a bannister rail a few inches below the top of that wall. What makes you imagine it was so tall?

Having overestimated its height by about 2 feet, do you also think it was designed to be bulletproof? What do you think the construction of that wall was? My guess would be drywall sheet on wooden studding.
Click to expand...

[pedantic jref mode]

Fire code for high-occupation load commercial buildings is metal studs. If the dividing walls are designed to reduce sound transmission between theaters each face will have a set of studs, offset, possibly with double layers of drywall or with one layer of drywall topping a layer of fire resistant soundboard, and possibly with insulation interwoven between the two rows of studs.

mass_construction_pathway.gif

[/pedantic]

Even in all possible methods of preventing sound transmission within fire code are implemented, bullets will still pass through the wall. The added mass may increase the likelihood of bullets fragmenting in passage.
 
Safe-Keeper said:
This is why I love CT discussions. We get to shoot down ridiculous claims and learn lots of things from each other in the process, and the CTers and trolls receive their share of adrenaline from... whatever it is they get out of these discussions. Lots and lots of attention they may not get enough of in Real Life, perhaps.

Either way, we're wrestling with pigs, we both get dirty and we both love it:blush:.
#guiltypleasure
Click to expand...

Well said...er I mean OINK OINK OINK!
 
Neveos said:
Me and NoahFence and FrederickEason versus all of the rest of you.
Click to expand...

Apparently the "promise" you made in the OP...that you would "prove" the official story , false, was just another CTer LIE.

...and you wonder why no one takes you seriously??...really??
 
I'm not making the case that bullets couldn't pass through the wall. I already strongly suspect a fragmenting bullet or some sort of debris hit Mikayla Hicks in her mouth, given where she was seated (right next to the wall in the upper left corner of theater 8). I'm just saying the chances decrease the further away from the wall, and the more walls that are in the way (which could very well have been three). I'm also saying maybe this experience suggests an explosive went off:

heard a hiss, saw smoke, saw a flash, heard a loud bang (a "boom") accompanied by a lot of popping sounds (similar to a black cat, probably), felt heat on leg, received shrapnel injury,

"Firecracker hit me in the back of the head" golditch
"they set gas bombs as they were leaving" glasses girl
"thought kids were throwing fire crackers into the theater" ostergaard
"they threw gas bombs into our theater" fedelli
"my ears were ringing" golditch
"it was louder than it hurt" golditch
"I saw an explosion" ostergaard
"My leg got really hot" walton
"2 pops and a big cloud of smoke, then another pop, and more smoke... people were saying it could have been fireworks... no one knew there was a shooting in theater 9" fedelli
 
Last edited:
Neveos said:
I'm not making the case that bullets couldn't pass through the wall. I already strongly suspect a fragmenting bullet or some sort of debris hit Mikayla Hicks in her mouth, given where she was seated (right next to the wall in the upper left corner of theater 8). I'm just saying the chances decrease the further away from the wall, and the more walls that are in the way (which could very well have been three). I'm also saying maybe this experience suggests an explosive went off:

heard a hiss, saw smoke, saw a flash, heard a loud bang (a "boom") accompanied by a lot of popping sounds (similar to a black cat, probably), felt heat on leg, received shrapnel injury,

"Firecracker hit me in the back of the head" golditch
"they set gas bombs as they were leaving" glasses girl
"thought kids were throwing fire crackers into the theater" ostergaard
"they threw gas bombs into our theater" fedelli
"my ears were ringing" golditch
"it was louder than it hurt" golditch
"I saw an explosion" ostergaard
"My leg got really hot" walton
"2 pops and a big cloud of smoke, then another pop, and more smoke... people were saying it could have been fireworks... no one knew there was a shooting in theater 9" fedelli
Click to expand...
So?

This is nothing you think should get you killed. :confused:
 
Neveos said:
^^^ Hmmm, sounds like we have an agenda going on here...
Click to expand...
It is your agenda not comprehending what people mean, the same way you do with the event. It is an agenda of fantasy, not using logic and knowledge.
Yes, you have no idea what the poster was saying, like you twist witness testimony you found on the internet to feed your fantasy, and failed claims.
 
Neveos said:
I'm also saying maybe this experience suggests an explosive went off:

heard a hiss, saw smoke, saw a flash, heard a loud bang (a "boom") accompanied by a lot of popping sounds (similar to a black cat, probably), felt heat on leg, received shrapnel injury,
Click to expand...



Highlighted the portions that don't conform to an explosive going off, particularly if they happened in this order. In fact, "a lot of popping sounds" similar to firecrackers is more consistent with gunfire than a single explosive.

You're also missing all the other evidence that a explosive would leave, as listed by others above, and ignored by you.

So, to sum up: Large amounts of the evidence you have don't suggest a bomb, some of it does suggest gunfire, and you lack other evidence that should be there if a bomb went off.

Now that you've conceded that bullets passing through the wall are at least a plausible source for the injuries sustained, and in light of the above, why should we accept your hypothetical bomb as being a more likely cause for these injuries, as compared to the known existence of the gunman?
 
Neveos said:
I'm not making the case that bullets couldn't pass through the wall. I already strongly suspect a fragmenting bullet or some sort of debris hit Mikayla Hicks in her mouth, given where she was seated (right next to the wall in the upper left corner of theater 8). I'm just saying the chances decrease the further away from the wall, and the more walls that are in the way (which could very well have been three).
Click to expand...

I fail to see how it could be three unless he was shooting while seated.
 
phunk said:
I fail to see how it could be three unless he was shooting while seated.
Click to expand...



If he was shooting from farther away from the screen, across the audience, there are lots of paths that would potentially cross three walls (the left stairwell wall in 9, the separating wall, and the right stairwell wall in 8).

The problem is the suggestion that these are the only trajectories possible.
 
Neveos said:
I'm just saying the chances decrease the further away from the wall, and the more walls that are in the way (which could very well have been three).
Click to expand...

Decrease to what? This is actually stating the obvious.

It would help if you could muster a bit of focus and actually formulate a point you're trying to make.

If some point is wrong, so...............................?



PS: I looked at the "Heart attack gun" video. You're lying. (yeah, I know) ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom