• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proving the Aurora Theater Shooting's official story false

[qimg]http://i479.photobucket.com/albums/rr157/antpogo/escalated_zps16b4eeca.jpg[/qimg]

Didn't we have a superagent posing here some years back: Book and course in training spies, stories about lesbian gangs or related out to kill him - but always failing.
 
Didn't we have a superagent posing here some years back: Book and course in training spies, stories about lesbian gangs or related out to kill him - but always failing.

sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony
 
If there was bombs and they were reported, how would this change anything? Why the big cover-up?

Frankly. I don't get it.
 
sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony

Could you please, for the umpteenth time, provide a source for this testimony? Who was talking, who were they talking to, what questions were asked, how long after the shooting did the statements you are relying on occur, and what else was said during that "testimony?"

(I don't think it was actually under oath testimony so I think you are using that word to try and lend credibility to statements made during a normal news interview but I await your response.)

As for how people in different parts of theatre 8 got shot it is easily explained by the shooters movements up the aisle shooting in the direction of theatre 8. As we don't know exactly where each shot was fired from it would be impossible to say conclusively that someone could not have been shot from theatre 9.
 
sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony

What do you do when two eyewitnesses provide two conflicting accounts?

What do you do when five eyewitnesses provide five conflicting accounts?
 
sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony

Well you should raise your own bar a bit because eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable.

I notice you dismiss all the eye witness testimony that doesn't support your conspiracy.
 
What do you do when two eyewitnesses provide two conflicting accounts?

What do you do when five eyewitnesses provide five conflicting accounts?

You pick the one that supports your own bias... duh!
 
sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony



Ok, how about this. I was an eyewitness to the formation of the Earth, the birth of Jesus, the first moon landing, and the birth of now but not then President Obama.

Do you accept all those things?
 
What do you do when two eyewitnesses provide two conflicting accounts?

He already answered it. As I said, I had a friend in the theater whose recollection of the events does not match what is being reported here. Neveos simply discounted that testimony. So a more accurate rendition of his sentiment would be, "I accept things like eyewitness testimony when it fits what I want to believe."
 
Any college professor (you know, "people that matter") clicking the thread is completely turned to the dark side no matter what you do now. In fact, further "attacking" Thomas Brinkley just turns them on to bigger ****. So.......

I'm a college professor... Still a Rebel.
 
...i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony

By admitting that you credulously accept notoriously unreliable eyewitness "evidence", you have effectively destroyed your own argument.

Congratulations. :)
 
...i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony
So what conclusion do you draw from the fact that eyewitness testimonies are always contradictory? Do you just pick the one that best fits your CT?
 
sry, i tend to accept things like eye witness testimony
And this is why you fail.

When you learn more, and understand just how unreliable eyewitness testimony is, especially in times of stress or fear, you may fail less. But now... not so much.

I taught at a college once, too.
 
Not to mention all the early reports that proved to be false. Remember the "He was dressed as the film's Villian" reports?
 

Back
Top Bottom