• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proving the Aurora Theater Shooting's official story false

You should learn what an ad hominen actually is. It is not, for example, an ad hominen to point out that you produce crazy videos with crazy claims when you make crazy claims and point to crazy videos on a forum.

It is not an ad hominen to point out that your sole purpose in being here seems to be to claim victory on your youtube channel.
 
Neveos said:
I was actually just wondering when the connection to Thomas Brinkley would have been conjectured for ad hominem attack. I knew I had won when that happens.
Click to expand...

Wait. Are you actually trying to pretend you aren't "Thomas Brinkly"?

That's cuuute!
 
kookbreaker said:
You should learn what an ad hominen actually is. It is not, for example, an ad hominen to point out that you produce crazy videos with crazy claims when you make crazy claims and point to crazy videos on a forum.
Click to expand...
Oh, so you agree with the analysis in the OP?
 
Muc said:
Oh, our cocky young friend sure does have an idea why this happened. Here it is:

Young Neveos tried to prevent an imaginary plot against Ron Paul, so TPTB staged the Aurora shooting to discredit him by picking a patsy that was based on his "persona" on purpose. However, when our brilliant protagonist started to "slam the entire operation" through vigorous YouTubing, they had to "kill or fire" a number of people "involved in the cover-up", including ... wait for it ... Tony Scott. This is only the synopsis from a YouTube video description, so there might be more scandal for anyone who actually bothers to watch one and a half hours of late night rambling. Naturally the evildoers are after young Neveos now, too, but apparently the death squads are to stupid to find his house.

I wish I was kidding, but I'm not, so it's really not just the stupid smiley in front of the thread title that says something is wrong here. I'm not quite sure any attempts at rational discussion will be fruitful here. It appears that the only reason why this guy is here is so he can claim he was "Pwning the JREF" on YouTube.
Click to expand...

So the OP believes the Aurora shooting was staged, entirely for the purpose of discrediting him?

How does that actually work, do you suppose? I wonder if people say to him "I don't believe you any more, not since that guy who appears to be based on your persona shot all those people at a cinema. No, sir. I can't trust a word you say."

Do you think he gets that a lot?
 
The NWO wanted the world to think one nutjob attacked one theater. So they attacked two theaters at once and let victims from both theaters be interviewed for television news networks.
 
BenjaminTR said:
The NWO wanted the world to think one nutjob attacked one theater. So they attacked two theaters at once and let victims from both theaters be interviewed for television news networks.
Click to expand...

well which one is it? They are too stupid to perform massive cover-ups, or they are too smart to mess them up?
 
Neveos said:
well which one is it? They are too stupid to perform massive cover-ups, or they are too smart to mess them up?
Click to expand...

Hey, aren't you that guy who shot all those people... Oh, no, wait. Sorry, that was someone else.

Had a very similar persona though. Easy mistake to make. My apologies.
 
Neveos said:
Oh the laughter, of which i am sincerely experiencing, is coming from the realization of the absurdity possessed by those of you that are trying to explain the experiences they report to have had as a collective illusory episode. For instance, the flashes, the hissing sounds, the firecracker popping noises, the heat, they were all experiencing illusions which coincided with shrapnel injuries, and bullet trajectory inconsistencies...

That is a totally valid conclusion. Not at all very sound, but totally valid. Hmmmm :-)
Click to expand...

Where is the blast damage from explosives? Maybe it was a psychic bomb?
 
DGM said:
Maybe he's the one in theater 8? :eek:
Click to expand...

Probably resents the other guy getting all the attention.

I mean you go to all the trouble of dropping a flashbang under some dude's seat and get ignored just because some guy in the next theatre brought a bunch of guns. Where's the justice?
 
Rather than smugly claiming some sort of victory after not really making any claims would you care to provide a source and context for the witness statements you think are so important?

Eta care to address the potential confusion by the witnesses between the movie sounds and the shooting?
 
Last edited:
Neveos said:
I was actually just wondering when the connection to Thomas Brinkley would have been conjectured for ad hominem attack. I knew I had won when that happens.
Click to expand...

Win? Rats, nobody even told me there was a contest.

What did you win? Is this winning the Charlie Sheen type winning?
 
Neveos said:
I have all the angles covered. The checkmate plays out on the news before your eyes.
Click to expand...

....nope...nada...nothing...ziltch...bupkis...



So just how long are we supposed to wait for this "playing out" before determining that you don't have a clue*??


*Actually figured that out from your first post, but am trying to give you the "benefit of the doubt", as you deserve all the "rope" you can get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom