• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Who is Behind 9/11 and Why? (Chomsky)

Mikeys said:
You can condition anything all you want or you can simply add 2 and 2 together and get the answers. Facts are the ME was occupied soon after 911. Remember W swinging the axe left and right, big daddy and all. Did they benefit from 911? Of course. Did they benefit from the 911 crash physics? There you go. There sure additinal profits were squzzed out but to claim 3000 people had to die to take down asbestos ridden buildings is overkill.
Click to expand...

Even though I have no idea what you just tried to say I'm pretty sure what you were attempting to articulate was dead wrong.
 
Mikeys said:
You can condition anything all you want or you can simply add 2 and 2 together and get the answers. Facts are the ME was occupied soon after 911. Remember W swinging the axe left and right, big daddy and all. Did they benefit from 911? Of course. Did they benefit from the 911 crash physics? There you go. There sure additinal profits were squzzed out but to claim 3000 people had to die to take down asbestos ridden buildings is overkill.
Click to expand...

I'm sure it's English, Jim. just not English as we know it.
 
Mikeys said:
You can condition anything all you want or you can simply add 2 and 2 together and get the answers. Facts are the ME was occupied soon after 911. Remember W swinging the axe left and right, big daddy and all. Did they benefit from 911? Of course. Did they benefit from the 911 crash physics? There you go. There sure additinal profits were squzzed out but to claim 3000 people had to die to take down asbestos ridden buildings is overkill.
Click to expand...


Apparently in Trutherland it is impossible to "profit" from someone else's crime.
 
Mikeys said:
Are you trying to say that the 1993 wtc explosion was not a false flag?
Click to expand...
In your world of fantasy and woo, everything is a false flag? An evidence free world where science is banned, 911 truth. Internet U., where 911 truth finds "evidence".
 
Mikeys said:
You can condition anything all you want or you can simply add 2 and 2 together and get the answers. Facts are the ME was occupied soon after 911. Remember W swinging the axe left and right, big daddy and all. Did they benefit from 911? Of course. Did they benefit from the 911 crash physics? There you go. There sure additinal profits were squzzed out but to claim 3000 people had to die to take down asbestos ridden buildings is overkill.
Click to expand...

Kindly supply the cypher you used so we can decode your message.
 
Perhaps badly articulated. I didn't say profit from someone elses crime is wrong or implicating. Profit from 911 crash physics however would be seen as such, which is what I tried to say.
 
Mikeys said:
Are you trying to say that the 1993 wtc explosion was not a false flag?
Click to expand...


Uhhhh, no. That's not was I was trying to say, but since you ask, I am unaware of any compelling evidence that would indicate that the WTC bombing was a "false flag".

As I'm sure you'll agree, the U.S. Government has, through its actions and its inactions, angered a lot of people, a lot of organizations, a lot of countries in the last 237 years. Wouldn't you expect at least the occasional violent reprisal in the form of what is popularly termed a "terrorist attack"?

ETA: Are you trying to say that it is impossible to "profit" from someone else's crime?
 
Last edited:
JohnG said:
As I'm sure you'll agree, the U.S. Government has, through its actions and its inactions, angered a lot of people, a lot of organizations, a lot of countries in the last 237 years. Wouldn't you expect at least the occasional violent reprisal in the form of what is popularly termed a "terrorist attack"?
Click to expand...

I will agree with it. Prevention is the best form of defence, but it also creates lies, and more lies, white lies, big lies, never ending chain of lies. Disinfo, grease, dishonesty. Apprently terrorism didn't stop or weaken after 911 but increased in activity.
 
Mikeys said:
Perhaps badly articulated. I didn't say profit from someone elses crime is wrong or implicating. Profit from 911 crash physics however would be seen as such, which is what I tried to say.
Click to expand...

Now that you have said it please explain how one would profit from 911 crash physics? Did anyone profit from Titanic crash physics or car crash physics?
 
Mikeys said:
I will agree with it. Prevention is the best form of defence, but it also creates lies, and more lies, white lies, big lies, never ending chain of lies. Disinfo, grease, dishonesty. Apprently terrorism didn't stop or weaken after 911 but increased in activity.
Click to expand...


I'm not entirely sure you understood my question. Let's put it this way; a subset of the people/organizations/countries who feel they have been in some way wronged by the U.S. occasionally strike back at the U.S. in the form of what are commonly referred to as "terrorist attacks". Conspiracy Theorists tend to dismiss most, if not all, of these "terrorist attacks" as "false flags".

Why?
 
JohnG said:
I'm not entirely sure you understood my question. Let's put it this way; a subset of the people/organizations/countries who feel they have been in some way wronged by the U.S. occasionally strike back at the U.S. in the form of what are commonly referred to as "terrorist attacks". Conspiracy Theorists tend to dismiss most, if not all, of these "terrorist attacks" as "false flags".

Why?
Click to expand...

And I've very rarely, if ever, heard a CT'er dismiss an attack on a non-US ally as a false flag (putting aside Nazi Germany). Curious.
 
trustbutverify said:
And I've very rarely, if ever, heard a CT'er dismiss an attack on a non-US ally as a false flag (putting aside Nazi Germany). Curious.
Click to expand...

Is there a name for this physiological condition? I propose False Flag De-Cognitive Syndrome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom