Let's see here, you have Stefanoni's boss who'd be in a world of trouble if his lab was stuffing up DNA work, you have Mignini's buddy from the MoF case who thinks high RFU values mean blood and admitted after the humiliation of Stefanoni that perhaps Italian forensics were behind the times, and two hired by adversaries whose best interest was in backing the prosecution and never saw the actual data required to evaluate the work they just took everything Stefanoni said at face value.
Then there's all the ones who were completely free of any influences outside the integrity of their field who stringently protested, some of whom later came to realize that (and many other things) meant Amanda and Raffaele were innocent.
Punctuated by the report of Conti and Vecchiotti.
man you've really studies up on everybody associated with this case. one wouldn't be surprised if these people had a horse head show up in their bed one night.
C and V didn't dispute raffe's Y DNA being on the bra clasp, which would certainly point to him. they said contamination was possible but never laid out a specific and believable scenario in which that could have occurred so it's meaningless conjecture that is useless in a criminal trial. they also only contested 4 or 5 of the loci on the auto. DNA which the prosecution could concede and still the DNA profile would point to Raffe. the Hellman jury said that that this DNA could have been anybody but that isn't even what C and V argued as I understand it, and it's pretty clear this judge and jury just didn't understand what their so called experts said.