Merged Released For Earth Day: Sirius (UFO Flick)

[G6000]

A UFO hunter's wet dream is being released today: http://siriusdisclosure.com/NewEnergy/?referrer=14386565mklqqn

It's free to download if you are an Affiliate, whatever that is. It will be more widely released for free downloading in a few days on various web sites/pages.

Here is the theatrical trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJZ8wZrCCv0

Some press releases:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10641553.htm

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10591131.htm

Last week, the upcoming documentary film team behind 'Sirius' released an announcement about the scientific study of a DNA sequenced humanoid of unknown classification, known as the 'Atacama Humanoid.'

The announcement went viral immediately, quickly becoming the most popular story on the Huffington Post for three days, generating 4,300 comments, 32,000 FB 'Likes' and additional coverage by various other news agencies. The film's trailer on YouTube, has now generated a combined 1.1 million views. In response to the numerous questions raised by the film's trailer release, Dr. Steven Greer and the team behind 'Sirius' are now revealing more details about the results of the scientific studies that are documented in the film.

A DNA sample from bone marrow extracted from the specimen, was prepared, sequenced, and analyzed by a top research scientist at a prestigious American university. For security purposes, 'Sirius' has withheld details on the university and researcher, but will be revealing both along with additional DNA analysis results from the 'Atacama Humanoid' on or before the release of 'Sirius' on the 22nd of April.

It appears to be a movie about zero point energy. The rubes will be lining up to buy these hoax contraptions after this movie gets wide play.

Enjoy...

 

[Stray Cat]

Indeed, science rarely makes it's most important and relevant results available in a movie on YouTube before thorough peer review of the research work.

I remember about a year ago Greer begging for money to make this film... at the time I asked why he didn't simply make lots of free energy and sell it to raise the money... I got no response.

 

[MrBooglemaumau]

I saw a pic of the 6" high alleged humanoid , where are the rest of them? Reeks of "Fake" to me, like BF,if this story were to be true I'd like to know where the rest of the clan is hiding,who or what are it's parents ? The article I read didn't make any claims of it being an Alien from outer space .So..is this going to be called"Little foot"????

 

[De_Bunk]

UK doctors and real UK research scientists have totally proved it's a human fetus, beyond any doubt, whatsoever..and of Peruvian/ Indian birth thru DNA or whatever tests they do.

Read this story in the 'Guardian' or could have been the 'Times'..Can't remember..

DB

 

[G6000]

UK doctors and real UK research scientists have totally proved it's a human fetus, beyond any doubt, whatsoever..and of Peruvian/ Indian birth thru DNA or whatever tests they do.

Read this story in the 'Guardian' or could have been the 'Times'..Can't remember..

DB

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/tiny-chile-alien-backgrou_n_3071767.html

A second document, from a forensic medical expert at Basque Country University, concluded: "It's a mummified body with all typical characteristics of a fetus. The body displays all the structures and anatomical links normal for the head, trunk and extremities. Taken together, the proportionality of the anatomical structures ... [allows us] to interpret beyond doubt, that this is a mummified human fetus completely normal."

And yet, promotional materials for the upcoming "Sirius" documentary suggest how DNA analysis resulted in the creature being of "unknown classification."

 

[marcus777]

The most exciting new information in the film was how top scientists at Stanford University have now successfully analyzed, DNA-sampled and DNA-tested this humanoid specimen.

As it turns out, it IS biological. We now have absolute proof, from leading world experts, that this being was a living, six-inch-tall humanoid organism.

Dr. Garry Nolan, the Director of Stem Cell Biology at Stanford, was willing to risk possible harassment, career ruin or even assassination to conduct the tests and determine what the Atacama humanoid may be -- and / or what it is not.

We see Nolan's undergraduate degree from Cornell and Ph.D. from Stanford hanging on the wall.

THIS DOES NOT MATCH ANY KNOWN MUTATION OR DEFORMITY

To aid the investigation, Dr. Garry Nolan then commandeered one of the top genetic experts in the world on fetal mutations and deformities -- Dr. Ralph S. Lachman.

As Dr. Nolan reveals, Dr. Lachman literally wrote the book on childhood skeletal dysplasia -- which would be the only conceivable avenue for skeptics to attack this case as being merely a conventional human baby, or a non-human primate.

Although Lachman was not willing to go on camera, he produced a written statement for SIRIUS -- indicating that the many anomalies of this little being, including a massive cranial vault and only 10 ribs instead of the normal 12, do not match with any known human deformities or mutations.

He did NOT say this was an extraterrestrial. He DID say, in his professional opinion, that we have never seen any human being on Earth like this.

Not once. Not ever.

We know it is human, or human-like, thanks to Dr. Nolan's DNA testing. We know it is not a fetus. It grew to be at least six years of age.

We also know that we have never seen a living human anywhere near this small. There are many, many anomalies in its physiology that cannot be explained.

Furthermore, despite its small stature, it strongly resembles the appearance of beings we have seen in various UFO contact reports.

Got to be a hoax?

 

[Hellbound]

Just a point of information on the DNA analysis.

Degraded, bad, or otherwise compromised DNA samples will often be returned from a lab as "No match".

My suspsicion is that, just like many Bigfoot samples, the people who ordered the testing do NOT go on to read the detailed notes (I would assume the lab would put in some notation that the sample was too degraded for positive matching) or that they don't understand the test enough to realize that "No Match" or "Unknown" cover a LOT more mundane territory than "bigfoot" or "alien" (if the lab doesn't provide the detailed information).

 

[Stray Cat]

Just a point of information on the DNA analysis.

Degraded, bad, or otherwise compromised DNA samples will often be returned from a lab as "No match".

My suspsicion is that, just like many Bigfoot samples, the people who ordered the testing do NOT go on to read the detailed notes (I would assume the lab would put in some notation that the sample was too degraded for positive matching) or that they don't understand the test enough to realize that "No Match" or "Unknown" cover a LOT more mundane territory than "bigfoot" or "alien" (if the lab doesn't provide the detailed information).

Greer is an expert in misrepresenting people's words and quote mining in order to make it appear like people's results fit what ever narrative he is attempting to promote.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if "no match" became "alien" in his deceptive hands.

 

[sophia8]

Bad UFOs has reviewed this.

In the end, no halfway intelligent person will be swayed by this film. The only people who will be impressed will be those who breathlessly await each new episode of Ancient Aliens on the History Channel.

 

[TsuDhoNimh]

"THIS DOES NOT MATCH ANY KNOWN MUTATION OR DEFORMITY"

Of course not, because it's a NORMAL human fetus, mummified by the dry conditions where it was buried.

 

[nablator]

Of course not, because it's a NORMAL human fetus, mummified by the dry conditions where it was buried.

The missing floating ribs could be just... missing I guess. But there is definitely something wrong about the skull. The proportions are all wrong.

Superposed skull plates - to hide normal fetus fontanelles? Some bits that don't look natural on both sides as if glued together. And what is this around the orbits? Epoxy?

I would like to read another expert's opinion about the alleged 6-8-year-old epiphyseal plates. The X-ray and close-up photos can be downloaded from siriusdisclosure.com (Atacama report menu).

 

[TsuDhoNimh]

The missing floating ribs could be just... missing I guess. But there is definitely something wrong about the skull. The proportions are all wrong.

As the brain tissue dehydrated, the skull plates collapsed towards each other along the sutures, leaving the shape you see. They aren't ossified enough to hold a "skull" shape you were expecting without the support of underlying tissue.

 

[Skeptic Guy]

I wonder where they got the 6 to 8 years old? No way that could be correct.

 

[Stray Cat]

I wonder where they got the 6 to 8 years old? No way that could be correct.

They turned the little guy over and pulled it out his ass.

 

[Childlike Empress]

I wonder where they got the 6 to 8 years old? No way that could be correct.

You can read up on it here.

[...] the most startling conclusion to date is that Dr. Lachman concluded the humanoid lived to be 6- 8 years of age. (See Dr. Lachman’s full report here…). This was assessed by examining the epiphyseal plates in the knees and comparing these to normal humans of various ages.

 

[LTC8K6]

http://news.discovery.com/human/alien-looking-skeleton-poses-medical-mystery-130430.htm

Well, it's not ET then...

 

[marcus777]

I saw a pic of the 6" high alleged humanoid , where are the rest of them? Reeks of "Fake" to me, like BF,if this story were to be true I'd like to know where the rest of the clan is hiding,who or what are it's parents ? The article I read didn't make any claims of it being an Alien from outer space .So..is this going to be called"Little foot"????

not fake

UK doctors and real UK research scientists have totally proved it's a human fetus, beyond any doubt, whatsoever..and of Peruvian/ Indian birth thru DNA or whatever tests they do.

Read this story in the 'Guardian' or could have been the 'Times'..Can't remember..

DB

the guys in stanford are saying it is not a fetus

Just a point of information on the DNA analysis.

Degraded, bad, or otherwise compromised DNA samples will often be returned from a lab as "No match".

My suspsicion is that, just like many Bigfoot samples, the people who ordered the testing do NOT go on to read the detailed notes (I would assume the lab would put in some notation that the sample was too degraded for positive matching) or that they don't understand the test enough to realize that "No Match" or "Unknown" cover a LOT more mundane territory than "bigfoot" or "alien" (if the lab doesn't provide the detailed information).

they say they have excellent dna samples

"THIS DOES NOT MATCH ANY KNOWN MUTATION OR DEFORMITY"

Of course not, because it's a NORMAL human fetus, mummified by the dry conditions where it was buried.

stanford disagree

As the brain tissue dehydrated, the skull plates collapsed towards each other along the sutures, leaving the shape you see. They aren't ossified enough to hold a "skull" shape you were expecting without the support of underlying tissue.

why have they not come up with this theory?

I wonder where they got the 6 to 8 years old? No way that could be correct.

they say they calculated thisby the epiphyseal plates in the knees and also the developed teeth in the jaw






Certainly is a strange one!

 

[R.A.F.]

not fake

Care to elaborate?, or should I just respond with yes, fake??

the guys in stanford are saying it is not a fetus

What "guys"?

Again, can you elaborate?, or should I just respond with no, "they
didn't say that"?

they say they have excellent dna samples

Same as above....simple declarative sentences are not "enough" if you want to convince others that your opinion has any validity.

 

[Elizabeth I]

WTH? 6-inch "alien" skeleton is human, belonged to 6- to 8-year-old?

This article on Live Science says a six-inch skeleton with a deformed skull found ten years ago in South America's Atacama Desert was (a) human and (b) belonged to a six- to eight-year-old child.

I can't figure out if this is a joke (since it was posted on April 30, if it's an April Fool it's badly mistimed) or junk science or what. Anybody know anything about Live Science? Is it some Onion-like online publication that I've just missed?

In the photos posted with the article, the skeleton doesn't even look real, but more like molded plastic or something carved out of wood.

Thoughts, comments, any additional information gratefully accepted.

 

[Mojo]

Are they sure it wasn't a pianist?