• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

WTC Dust said:
What type of contamination have you discovered in my WTC dust samples, and how were you able to test them?
Click to expand...


Do you seriously not know? Hell, you can't even determine that the sample is anything BUT contaminate, can you?
 
TheRedWorm said:
Do you seriously not know? Hell, you can't even determine that the sample is anything BUT contaminate, can you?
Click to expand...

Well, there are two types of WTC dust. That much was pretty easy to establish since you can see the two different types of dust with the unaided eye. Even proving that it had a high iron content was easy and did not require anything but a magnet and a string. I like simple, unassailable things like the fact that the dust makes a magnet move. That's pretty interesting. Even a child can come to the right conclusion that the thing is magnetic. Nobody discovered this before me! It was a shocker, even to me. Finding both types of dust was a surprise, too.
 
WTC Dust said:
Well, there are two types of WTC dust. That much was pretty easy to establish since you can see the two different types of dust with the unaided eye. Even proving that it had a high iron content was easy and did not require anything but a magnet and a string. I like simple, unassailable things like the fact that the dust makes a magnet move. That's pretty interesting. Even a child can come to the right conclusion that the thing is magnetic. Nobody discovered this before me! It was a shocker, even to me. Finding both types of dust was a surprise, too.
Click to expand...

And? How does that in any way answer my questions? In case you missed them:

TheRedWorm said:
Do you seriously not know? Hell, you can't even determine that the sample is anything BUT contaminate, can you?
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
Well, there are two types of WTC dust. That much was pretty easy to establish since you can see the two different types of dust with the unaided eye.
Click to expand...


As illustrated by your avatar, your "two types of WTC dust" assertion is utterly bogus. What you you claim is "dark dust" is smoke. From, you know, fire.



Even proving that it had a high iron content was easy and did not require anything but a magnet and a string.
Click to expand...

A demonstration I remember well, having watched your "world history-changing" webcast. The "demonstration" proved nothing except that fanning an object hanging from a string with currents of air will cause that item to swing--however slightly. Specifically, while you frequently repeat the claim that your dust can "make a magnet dance", you have not attempted to show a simple display of magnetic attraction when the magnet is placed next to the dust. That is because there is none.
 
Someone found iron? It is 6 percent of the earth's crust.

WTC Dust said:
Well, there are two types of WTC dust. That much was pretty easy to establish since you can see the two different types of dust with the unaided eye. Even proving that it had a high iron content was easy and did not require anything but a magnet and a string. I like simple, unassailable things like the fact that the dust makes a magnet move. That's pretty interesting. Even a child can come to the right conclusion that the thing is magnetic. Nobody discovered this before me! It was a shocker, even to me. Finding both types of dust was a surprise, too.
Click to expand...
Wow, what a shocker - 6 percent of the earth's crust is iron.

Why do you think skeptics are so gullible? Why are you wasting your time spreading silly lies? The thing is magnetic... lol
 
Holy Crap!!!! My 5 year old nephew just read the OP and has come to the conclusion WTC Dust is out of her mind.

Are we really still talking about a sample that was "discovered" 7 years after the fact? Debris that sat in a nice pile for 7 years, exposed to the elements, in the middle of Downtown Manhattan?

Sorry Dusty, until you provide evidence that the dust is physically from the twin towers it is not viable as a sample and any testing conducted on that dust is simply invalid. Period, end of story there is nothing left to say and no reason why this thread should go any further, until she can prove the dust is undeniably from the Towers and sat there for 7 years undisturbed any further conversation is a waste of breath.

Gee whiz you no planers are flat out nuts. Seek Help, please.
 
WTC Dust said:
Hey, that's cool. It's at least a beginning.

Please tell me what type of evidence you'd need in order to change your mind. Physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, eyewitness testimony?

What is the nature of the proof that you would require?
Click to expand...

Here's a list to start with:
Evidence you dust sample came from the WTC, so far you provided your word but that's not good enough
Evidence an energy weapon you've claimed was used exists
Proof that no planes hit the WTC.
Proof that the people who saw the planes corroborating the documentary, photographic, video, radar evidence are lying
 
WTC Dust said:
What type of contamination have you discovered in my WTC dust samples, and how were you able to test them?
Click to expand...

Round and round you go Tracy....Nobody here is convinced by your "evidence"..Do you realize that? Do you know why no one is convinced? So far, all you've offered is questionable evidence that has nothing significant to challenge the official evidence. You fail!
 
brazenlilraisin said:
As illustrated by your avatar, your "two types of WTC dust" assertion is utterly bogus. What you you claim is "dark dust" is smoke. From, you know, fire.





A demonstration I remember well, having watched your "world history-changing" webcast. The "demonstration" proved nothing except that fanning an object hanging from a string with currents of air will cause that item to swing--however slightly. Specifically, while you frequently repeat the claim that your dust can "make a magnet dance", you have not attempted to show a simple display of magnetic attraction when the magnet is placed next to the dust. That is because there is none.
Click to expand...

It wasn't drafty when I made the magnet dance with the dust.
 
djlunacee said:
Holy Crap!!!! My 5 year old nephew just read the OP and has come to the conclusion WTC Dust is out of her mind.

Are we really still talking about a sample that was "discovered" 7 years after the fact? Debris that sat in a nice pile for 7 years, exposed to the elements, in the middle of Downtown Manhattan?

Sorry Dusty, until you provide evidence that the dust is physically from the twin towers it is not viable as a sample and any testing conducted on that dust is simply invalid. Period, end of story there is nothing left to say and no reason why this thread should go any further, until she can prove the dust is undeniably from the Towers and sat there for 7 years undisturbed any further conversation is a waste of breath.

Gee whiz you no planers are flat out nuts. Seek Help, please.
Click to expand...



OK, fine. I'll ask you. What evidence would convince you that my samples are from WTC 2? DNA fingerprinting good enough?
 
djlunacee said:
Holy Crap!!!! My 5 year old nephew just read the OP and has come to the conclusion WTC Dust is out of her mind.
Click to expand...

By the way, a 5 year old will believe the dumbest things like the Bible, if an adult tells them it's the truth. 5 year olds are gullible. It's kind of mean to force yourself on a kid like that.
 
WTC Dust said:
By the way, a 5 year old will believe the dumbest things like the Bible, if an adult tells them it's the truth. 5 year olds are gullible. It's kind of mean to force yourself on a kid like that.
Click to expand...

A five year old kid wouldn't believe your 'theory'. No amount of forcing would do that. My six year old grandson knows that energy beam weapons are strictly for playtime.
 
dafydd said:
A five year old kid wouldn't believe your 'theory'. No amount of forcing would do that. My six year old grandson knows that energy beam weapons are strictly for playtime.
Click to expand...

No, they can also burn a hole in a speedboat engine at a distance at sea.

Evaporate a building? Not so much. Dusty never has answered the power supply question, most critical of the gating factors to my mind.
 
WTC Dust said:
By the way, a 5 year old will believe the dumbest things like the Bible, if an adult tells them it's the truth. 5 year olds are gullible. It's kind of mean to force yourself on a kid like that.
Click to expand...
Like all evidence on 911, can we add the bible as something you never read or understood?
Like the ten commandments. Based on your internet "footprint, you break most of the commandments, with extra work at spreading nonsensical lies. Who would use the bible as a guide; not you. You have no compassion, and spread lies about those who died on 911.

There are many kinds of WTC dust. Most the dust is gypsum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom