Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

[George 152]

She's nuts, and a fraud.

What exactly did you help her with?

Pointed out the exit sign ?????

 

[Dash80]

Pointed out the exit sign ?????

 

[MIKILLINI]

The location of the find.
The characteristics of the material.

You still don't understand the characteristics of metal foam...You've offered no proof to how this was determined... Your microscopic sample picture of "metal foam" hasn't been confirmed by anyone other than your claim. Why don't you do that? Don't you realize how important it is to your case?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I really doubt I EVER plan to demonstrate myself correct in terms that you would accept.

Forget about what I think.

Do you believe you will ever produce proof which would convince any reasonable person that what you found is some remnant of the WTCs steel frame, reduced to dust by an unknown process?

 

[Jim_MDP]

Dr. Wood has consistently refused to examine my work. She's an American hero, but she isn't my friend or colleague. She acts like she is the alpha and omega of 9/11 research. She took my help and my money, but she didn't credit me for it, and I don't need credit for it. I think she's a jerk.

But whatever. She did some good research.

Putting aside the impossible fantasy energy weapon... wasn't it Dr. Wood who had some huge blunder regarding burnt out cars that had been towed to a temp location?

I'm also trying to recall something about lightning or electricity and said rusted cars?

That Dr Wood?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Putting aside the impossible fantasy energy weapon... wasn't it Dr. Wood who had some huge blunder regarding burnt out cars that had been towed to a temp location?

I'm also trying to recall something about lightning or electricity and said rusted cars?

That Dr Wood?

Yeah, she has pictures of burnt cars which had been temporarily dumped along South Street, by the elevated FDR Drive, and she assumes this long line of vehicles mysteriously burned in situ despite being about a kilometer away from the WTC. She acknowledges that people have told her the cars were moved there but does not believe it.

http://www.drjudywood.co.uk/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html#toasted

Figure 56b is a particular prize, showing a police car with a caved-in roof and a large lump of building debris still sitting on top. I wonder how that flew all the way across Manhattan to land there.

If only the subject were not so grim it would be hilarious.

 

[Gamolon]

Yeah, she has pictures of burnt cars which had been temporarily dumped along South Street, by the elevated FDR Drive, and she assumes this long line of vehicles mysteriously burned in situ despite being about a kilometer away from the WTC. She acknowledges that people have told her the cars were moved there but does not believe it.

http://www.drjudywood.co.uk/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html#toasted

Figure 56b is a particular prize, showing a police car with a caved-in roof and a large lump of building debris still sitting on top. I wonder how that flew all the way across Manhattan to land there.

If only the subject were not so grim it would be hilarious.

She claims this car was burned while ON FDR due to the energy weapon:


I found this photo of the same car BEFORE it was moved to FDR. It sits in front of the Millenium Hilton Hotel. The red circle around the tree branch and the red arrow correspond to the red circles in the next picture:


The larger red circle on the right is the Millenium Hilton Hotel name pointed at by the red arrow in the photo above. The red circle on the left is the same tree branch in the red circle in the photo above:

 

[Craig4]

The location of the find.
The characteristics of the material.

This is nothing more than an appeal to your own authority. Being as you're a noplanner, the value here is only in dark comedy.

 

[Craig4]

I really doubt I EVER plan to demonstrate myself correct in terms that you would accept.

That would be a side effect of your errors not the result of anyone's closemindedness.

 

[WTC Dust]

That would be a side effect of your errors not the result of anyone's closemindedness.

Let me ask you in response, is there any way you might possibly change your mind? Is there a tiny chance in Hades that I am right about the dust?

 

[DGM]

Let me ask you in response, is there any way you might possibly change your mind? Is there a tiny chance in Hades that I am right about the dust?

Considering the fact you can't actually say what you're getting at, who knows. I think you think it's foam. That's about as far as you've got.

You've done a lot of typing but, you have not actually proven or even brought forth a hypothesis.

 

[dafydd]

Is there a tiny chance in Hades that I am right about the dust?

No. There are no such things as hologramatic planes and magic foamydustifying DEW weapons. All you have is a fantasy.

 

[Dash80]

Let me ask you in response, is there any way you might possibly change your mind? Is there a tiny chance in Hades that I am right about the dust?

No, there isn't.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Let me ask you in response, is there any way you might possibly change your mind? Is there a tiny chance in Hades that I am right about the dust?

Evidence would change my mind.

Hans

 

[WTC Dust]

No, there isn't.

This is why you won't see me attempting to convince you.

 

[WTC Dust]

Evidence would change my mind.

Hans

Hey, that's cool. It's at least a beginning.

Please tell me what type of evidence you'd need in order to change your mind. Physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, eyewitness testimony?

What is the nature of the proof that you would require?

 

[beachnut]

Hey, that's cool. It's at least a beginning.

Please tell me what type of evidence you'd need in order to change your mind. Physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, eyewitness testimony?

What is the nature of the proof that you would require?

You have made no rational claim, you have a fantasy. You have nothing.

Therefore you have failed to make point? Why can't you supply evidence to support your failed claims?

 

[Skibum]

Please tell me what type of evidence you'd need in order to change your mind. Physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, eyewitness testimony?

What is the nature of the proof that you would require?

Reality based evidence would be nice. I have been doing this for 8 years IIRC, I have seen apretty much all the evidence presented by the truther side, all based on conjecture and out of context clips and quotes. My mind has been open and willing to change, if your evidence is compelling.

 

[Dash80]

This is why you won't see me attempting to convince you.

You're not convincing anyone else either.

 

[ehcks]

Hey, that's cool. It's at least a beginning.

Please tell me what type of evidence you'd need in order to change your mind. Physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, documentary evidence, eyewitness testimony?

What is the nature of the proof that you would require?

Clearly and concisely state what it is you think happened, then say what brought you to that conclusion. Include tests others can repeat and replicate your results of, and include videos and pictures with high enough quality that they're not up to interpretation.

And stop bringing up completely impossible claims and other details that only exist in science fiction.