• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
There was no plane debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2, where
a collision between an airplane and a building is said to have taken place.
Click to expand...
Thinking like a child again. Wile E Coyote is not an educational cartoon. You lack any depth of research or understanding of the subject. Just because you are incredulous doesn't mean that what you think is right.
 
WTC Dust said:
There was no plane debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2, where
a collision between an airplane and a building is said to have taken place.
Click to expand...
How do you know? This is BS. You can say this as much as you want, but you were not there on the ground on 911, next to the building. You don't know.

Thus, your statement is nonsense, backed with your opinion. You don't know, and you can't prove your statement is true.

As for a 767 breaking the shell of the WTC; 11 and 175 had 7 and 11 times more energy than needed to enter the WTC shell. Break right through. It is called engineering, physics, and you failed to do the math before you posted woo.
 
Skibum said:
I think you are on to something. Perhaps the massive fire was caused by the chemicals they use to create the chemtrails. We don't know what those chemical are, perhaps they turn steel into foam. Keep up the good work.
Click to expand...
I think you've cracked this one (albeit inadvertently). The planes were chemtrail sprayers, they didn't leave a contrail due to the sprays being turned off to conserve the chemicals needed to foamify the steel on impact.

Did these planes leave a trail?...no, therefore it must be true.
 
WTC Dust said:
There was no plane debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2, where
a collision between an airplane and a building is said to have taken place.
Click to expand...

Where did all those people on those planes go?
 
I only read the first page of this thread. I apologize for being so lazy. But I am shocked in the lack of basic comprehension of physics, or simple logic...

The reason something like an aluminum jet airliner could do as much damage to the WTC, depends on many variables. We did not witness a piece of aluminum equal in matter to a piece of steel on 9.11.2001.. We saw a Boeing 767 full of aviation full slam into a uniquely designed steel tower at high speed.

Variables....

Why does a relatively light Kevlar vest stop a copper plated lead bullet [traveling faster than the speed of sound], when a half inch thick steel plate cannot stop that same projectile? Steel > Kevlar.. I am talking: Variables. Exactly what we saw on 9/11.

I can spend all day explaining the physics behind it. Or, the 9/11 twoofers who believe an aluminum body jet airliner should have bounced off a building [with no solid core] could take five minutes of their lives to search Google for the OBVIOUS answer.
 
dafydd said:
I don't know why she keeps ignoring evidence.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_23409515dafac0764a.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I love that photo, because it's inexplicable to most conspiracy theorists. Either, the wings fail to penetrate and bounce off, or they penetrate and leave a Wile E. Coyote style entry hole. Importantly, all that seems to matter is the material the wings are made of and maybe, just maybe, the speed of the plane.

So, how does a typical conspiracy theorist explain the fact that, in this photo, one wing penetrated and one didn't?

(Any sensible person says: collisions are complicated things and the effects on one part of the plane may be different than the effects on another, due to the many complex events occurring. It's very hard to predict the outcome with certainty.)
 
Dash80 said:
Nope, no plane sticking out of that hole. Dusty must have hallucinated that.
Click to expand...

In another thread she admitted that she was wrong about the ESB crash. I don't know why she's gone back to the plane sticking out nonsense. I can only assume that it is more attention seeking on her part.
 
WTC Dust said:
Why didn't these "fires" go out after 27 days of rain during the first 100 days post attack? Why was it still fuming one full year later?
Click to expand...

Why are you being intentionally ignorant here? Don't say you're not...These pictures are very obvious as to what they depict and what is happening at the time they were taken. You are either the most clueless person on the 'net craving the attention or you're posting as "Medical Marijuana Barbie". :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Sunstealer said:
Thinking like a child again. Wile E Coyote is not an educational cartoon. You lack any depth of research or understanding of the subject. Just because you are incredulous doesn't mean that what you think is right.
Click to expand...

You're mistaking me for someone who is confused.

I might be wrong, but I'm not wrong on the science involved in a collision.
 
muzungu100 said:
I think you've cracked this one (albeit inadvertently). The planes were chemtrail sprayers, they didn't leave a contrail due to the sprays being turned off to conserve the chemicals needed to foamify the steel on impact.

Did these planes leave a trail?...no, therefore it must be true.
Click to expand...

There weren't any hijacked planes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom