Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

[MIKILLINI]

It's the beginnings of an analysis.

No, your not even close to the beginning of an analysis. You need to establish what steps will be taken to ensure thorough scientific testing that overshadows the official investigation. When are you going to do that?

 

[Mudcat]

The kind that exist in science fiction.

No. Ironically enough science-fiction does have disintegration rays or, in Truther speak, dustification rays.

 

[CORed]

So your "WTC Dust" is possibly contaminated with poop, vomit and god knows what else.

How did you test for DNA again?

By smell, most likely.

 

[Justin39640]

By smell, most likely.

I envision Bill Murray's character at the end of the pool scene in Caddyshack.

 

[WTC Dust]

In the images of the WTC Towers, there is clearly smoke and dust. I agree with you up to that point. However, there is no evidence that any of the dust is from steel, structural or otherwise. I have read one analysis of dust samples collected after 9/11, and by far the majority components were gypsum (26% to 64% depending on sample) and concrete (14% to 31%). At most 1% of the dust was iron rich. Note: even iron rich dust did not necessarily come from the steel in the buildings.

I am sorry, but pictures of dust coming from collapsing buildings, a porous rock, and dust is not enough to convince me that this analysis is wrong. (Not to mention the fact that there are photos of massive piles of steel columns after the collapses, and all the other evidence that most of the steel survived.)

If what I'm saying is correct (that there is more than one type of dust), then those data could be perfectly correct while my analysis also stands correct. 1% iron in the dust? Still needs explaining. And some samples have much, much more than 1% iron.

 

[WTC Dust]

Is there anyone here who wants to discuss the multiple different types of WTC dust?

 

[Spanx]

Is there anyone here who wants to discuss the multiple different types of WTC dust?

Ok, what have you got ?

 

[dafydd]

Would anyone like to discuss the multiple types of dust in the pile of my living room carpet?

 

[Dash80]

Is there anyone here who wants to discuss the multiple different types of WTC dust?

Prove what you have is from the WTC, and not random filth scraped up from an airshaft

 

[Dash80]

Would anyone like to discuss the multiple types of dust in the pile of my living room carpet?

Yes, you need to vacuum regularly.

 

[Dash80]

If what I'm saying is correct (that there is more than one type of dust), then those data could be perfectly correct while my analysis also stands correct. 1% iron in the dust? Still needs explaining. And some samples have much, much more than 1% iron.

And? Our planet has iron in it. Big deal!

This "airshaft" you found the dust in? Is there any steel/metal in it that could have rusted and flaked onto the ledges?

 

[WTC Dust]

Ok, what have you got ?

For one thing, look at my avatar. Do you see the dark and the light dust, what I'm calling "fumes" in the picture (because they are moving upwards).

 

[WTC Dust]

Here is a zero magnification view and a 100X magnification view of some WTC dust.

 

[Skibum]

For one thing, look at my avatar. Do you see the dark and the light dust, what I'm calling "fumes" in the picture (because they are moving upwards).

You mean the dark smoke caused by the fires and the lighter colored dust cloud caused by the collapsing building???

 

[Dash80]

For one thing, look at my avatar. Do you see the dark and the light dust, what I'm calling "fumes" in the picture (because they are moving upwards).

Why do you keep repeating this lighter/darker "fumes" nonsense?

How many times does it have to be pointed out that your dark "fumes" are smoke and ash? Or that the light dust is concrete and drywall.

 

[Dash80]

Here is a zero magnification view and a 100X magnification view of some WTC dust random stuff I scraped up.

Fixed that for you,

You can't prove where it came from.

 

[Spanx]

Here is a zero magnification view and a 100X magnification view of some WTC dust.

Ok what next ?

Also what size is the zero magnification sample ?

 

[Sunstealer]

Ok what next ?

Also size is the zero magnification sample ?

It's 100ft across.

Dusty is such an amateur that she doesn't realise that the convention is to put a steel rule next the sample so the reader can gage size.

 

[Dash80]

It's 100ft across.

Dusty is such an amateur that she doesn't realise that the convention is to put a steel foam rule next the sample so the reader can gage size.

FTFY

 

[dafydd]

Yes, you need to vacuum regularly.

And destroy the evidence!?