Anyone what? Do you want comments on your camera work?Anyone? Beuller?
Science isn't always pretty.![]()
I've attached an image of the WTC dust in situ (as it was found) and three copies of the image with what I believe might be three different main types of WTC dust.
It's the beginnings of an analysis.
How did you test for DNA again?
It's the beginnings of an analysis.
It is not the beginning of an analysis it is not the beginning of the beginning of an analysis but it might be said it is the beginning of the end of your credibility.
So your "WTC Dust" is possibly contaminated with poop, vomit and god knows what else. How did you test for DNA again?
A "close up" (FALSE) "analysis" (FALSE) of "one piece" (WTF? THAT IS SO STUPID I CAN'T EVEN TELL IF IT IS FALSE) of "WTC" (FALSE) "dust" (FALSE)
That's because theirs wasn't marinated in NYC for 8 years. Yeah, no contamination there.Pictures of WTC dust and insulation samples:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/sample.location.html
Looks nothing like the pile of junk in your photos.