Ward,
- Just followed your suggestion. I.E.,
- I think that I asked about this previously (somewhere on Dan’s blog) — but, if I did, I can’t find it…
- According to Michael Ehrlich — the head of “Without a Trace,” the company to which Joe Marino refers when claiming that a really invisible patch is possible — the process for producing a really invisible patch requires the exclusive use of undamaged threads from the original cloth. In other words, even if this process were used on the carbon dating sample from the Shroud, the patch should show the same age as the rest of the cloth…
- Do we have a counter claim?
- (I have a possibility, but don’t know that it really makes sense.)
- I do have a possibility in mind -- which makes it difficult for me to dump (accept the refutation of) the patch theory altogether, but won't mention it till I get some word back (or, fail to get any word back) from my friends.
--- Jabba