Bigfoot DNA

Status
Not open for further replies.
HarryHenderson said:
I've just realized Wally Hermson is 'the guy' she's really been perpetrating this shamelessness against. Didn't Moneymaker service this guy's account enough way back when?
Click to expand...

Now 'yer on it.

Hersom was paying Moneymaker's salary for awhile at BFRO, yes. I don't know all the details but the insiders are targeting the likes of Hersom with these niche markets they are creating. The Texas Bigfoot Research Organization - they have all of this donated equipment and if I recall correctly Hersom was also involved in that.

She did a number of trips, to Greece for example, when at the same time property records indicate she was not making payments on loans. Add that to rockinkt's remarks about intent to defraud and you have the standard package of a con-man who is duping people into spending money that can't even be retrieved via civil suit because they are blowing the money on lavish lifestyle. There isn't any property to attach. Her lab is closed, and the property foreclosed. The money was spent in Greece, where Croatian men hire out as Gigalos.

A person who represents that they will do DNA testing under a presumption of standard operating procedures but who instead mixes in bleach and battery acid to the samples is perpetrating a crime even if Hersom is either too ashamed to sue or feels it is futile. A district attorney can still bring charges, but a District Attorney has to feel his office resources are best used to chase that crime instead of the various other crimes in his district. Generally it is the defrauded people who make complaints to District Attorneys. This is very similar to cases like spirit mediums where they escape prosecution because of willing victims. What they are doing may technically constitute crime but they are difficult cases to prosecute. Hersom would have to agree to get on the stand and testify against her. But that would destroy his goodwill in the Bigfoot community.
 
AlaskaBushPilot said:
...The Texas Bigfoot Research Organization - they have all of this donated equipment and if I recall correctly Hersom was also involved in that....
Click to expand...
Hi ABP,

Besides Ketchum's fiasco, Wally Hersom funds/has funded Matt Monkeymaker's BFRO:
(http://www.bfro.net/wally.asp, http://bigfootlives.blogspot.fr/2010/07/who-is-wally-hersom-and-how-can-i-get.html)

and backs/has backed Derek Randles Olympic Project:
(http://www.olympicproject.com/id1.html)

but not the TBRO afaiK.
 
Last edited:
Since the TBRC hoax outfit is a 501 whatever, do they have to report their donors and would that be a matter of public record?
 
My point is that there's just no evidence that Wally Hersom backs or has backed the TBRC as he backs or has backed the BFRO, the OP, Ketchum... (afaik).

PS: here is a link I found about anonymous donors and 501(c)(3) organizations:
http://www.nonprofitissues.com/publ...-identity-of-anonymous-donor.php#.UTyp6zfUtZc
When you say 501(c)(3) organization, I assume you mean a public charity and not a private foundation. With a private foundation, there is no such thing as an anonymous donor because all donors have to be disclosed on the annual Form 990-PF tax return, which is a public document. With a public charity, a large donor has to be disclosed to the IRS on Schedule B to the annual Form 990 tax information return. But that is not a completely public document so that the name on the form might be known only by the preparer and the officer who signs the return.
Click to expand...
...and it seems that the TBRC has this "501(c)(3) (public) charitable organization" status:
http://www.texasbigfoot.com/index.php/donations
http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/texcon-09/:
The TBRC is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt non-profit scientific charitable organization, comprised of volunteer investigators, scientists and naturalists, pursuing education and research activities pertaining to the centuries-old “Wildman” phenomenon in North America. The TBRC proposes that the source of the phenomenon is a biological entity, probably an unlisted large primate. The organization is actively engaged in activities designed to test that hypothesis, including the onsite investigation of credible reported sightings in the Ark-La-Tex-Okla region.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Their mutual "sighting" wasn't a very clear view was it? I read what Strain wrote about the events and how it was more of a blur, and scissor walks and all that. Uhm, yeah. Bush squatches and such also. They've told some great stories, and produced 0 tangible evidence to back it up. The evidence, and findings are always right around the corner.. checks in the mail buddy!

Put the bigfoot spin on it! (sort of like noll and randles do)

:D

I suspect it's just getting rolling. Give it a little more time to develop.
 
Last edited:
That's not their only encounter. Apprantely they have had about half a dozen shootings. I find it difficult to believe that they are getting within feet of them, but can't nab one. It's as if they are dealing with something that isn't biologically real.
 
Last edited:
OntarioSquatch said:
That's not their only encounter. Apprantely they have had about half a dozen shootings. I find it difficult to believe that they are getting within feet of them, but can't nab one. It's as if they are dealing with something that isn't biologically real.
Click to expand...
But it is real. It's time we 'skeptics' realize our Bigfoot salvation is already right in our hands, and simply accept him unconditionally as our lawd and savior. There's no way anyone could shoot half a dozen Bigfeet if there really was no such beast. So count me in. I'm convinced. I mean, I know Brown and Strain wouldn't be lying or hallucinating. I just know it. :eek:
 
OntarioSquatch said:
That's not their only encounter. Apprantely they have had about half a dozen shootings. I find it difficult to believe that they are getting within feet of them, but can't nab one. It's as if they are dealing with something that isn't biologically real.
Click to expand...

No one has yet. Odd.

Unless the gummint's been snatching them up; the MIBs are everywhere you know. And nowhere. Kinda like bigfoot.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
I find it difficult to believe that they are getting within feet of them, but can't nab one.
Click to expand...

You've made great strides in your critical thinking, OntarioSquatch.

1. A claim is made.
2. The claim is "difficult to believe" given present knowledge.
3. No one is under any obligation to accept the veracity of that claim until the claimant provides evidence sufficient to confirm the claim.

That's skepticism, and it's a fine, healthy way to approach a world in which we are bombarded with dubious claims every day.
 
She sure is persistent.

The Global Sasquatch Foundation Website has went live. I'm too new to post urls here but it launched. melbaketchum.

Intro Says:
"Welcome to the Global Sasquatch Foundation website! We hope that you enjoy browsing our website, and that you find a lot of useful information. We here at the Melba Ketchum Global Sasquatch Foundation are putting forth efforts to protect the Sasquatch. Due to the efforts of our founder Dr. Melba Ketchum it has been proven that the Sasquatch are a human hybrid. Here at G.S.F. we have made it a priority to protect these indigenous people from being hunted, harassed, or even killed. We feel that working together we can make a difference!!!!!"

The disclaimer in traditional Melba fashion - "Disclaimer: Any opinions express on any Q & A, blog or Advice page are only our opinions and we are not responsible."
 
Last edited:
Well the new Melba initiative must be working. To my knowlege no bigfoot/sasquatch has ever been harassed or killed and they are certainly "not responsible". In other news, Robert Lindsay seems to believe that the Dyer bigfoot body is for real and has even called it "the big reveal" on his blog. Can't bring myself to link it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom