• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
aggle-rithm said:
I love it when conspiracy theorists put two sources in the same quote that contradict each other. Cherry picking at its finest!

In the link provided, the FBI fingerprint expert said that the poor condition of the wood and metal in the rifle made it extremely unlikely that a clear fingerprint would be left.

Then an un-named agent went back and somehow got a palm print from a dead Oswald on that same rifle.
Click to expand...

No contradiction or Cherry Picking at all, Sherlock. It's the FBI's statements that are contradictory which implicates the FBI as a conspirator in the cover-up.
 
Its simple Robert very very simple Oswald was a failed revolutionary, a nothing, not even the Soviet Union wanted him, so he took his chance and killed the president.
 
Dcdrac said:
Its simple Robert very very simple Oswald was a failed revolutionary, a nothing, not even the Soviet Union wanted him, so he took his chance and killed the president.
Click to expand...

A conclusion unsupported by any facts. A familiar one-note song from low information posters.
 
Robert why is it so hard for you to accept that it was just one lone failure?

Would it really casue your whole world to come crashing down to accept one simple fact.
 
Robert Prey said:
Only if the questions keep repeating from low information posters and worth repeating:

Obtaining Prints of Deceased Persons
<snip>
Click to expand...

Which is nothing to do at all with getting a latent print onto something.
That's all about taking a print from a body for identification.
 
Robert for your information I have read tonnes of books about the assiantion of JFK all of them on face value convincing until the cold light of analysis is put into play the the baloney soon appears along with the massive holes and conjectures they turn out to be.

After cutting all the verbiage and conjecture all that is left is one simple fact a failed loner took a chance to make something of himself and a splash in history and thatis all there is to it.
 
Tolls said:
Which is nothing to do at all with getting a latent print onto something.
That's all about taking a print from a body for identification.
Click to expand...

Of course. But that wasn't the question. All you have to do to get a palm print on a rifle is to put the palm on the rifle.
 
Dcdrac said:
Robert why is it so hard for you to accept that it was just one lone failure?

Would it really casue your whole world to come crashing down to accept one simple fact.
Click to expand...

Not a "fact" but a conclusion unsupported by any facts. Anyone can state a conclusion:

Jackie did it.

or

The driver did it.

or

Last night the cow jumped over the moon.

See how easy it is to be a low information poster? Such persons have no need of "facts."
 
Robert Prey said:
Of course. But that wasn't the question. All you have to do to get a palm print on a rifle is to put the palm on the rifle.
Click to expand...


When the palm is attached to a live person excreting sweat and oils through the skin, or inks, etc have been applied to the skin allowing the friction ridges to leave an impression. Here's an overview.

Putting a dead man's palm on the rifle will not leave an impression as the skin is no longer sweating, etc and if Oswald's palm print was on the rifle in ink don't you think that might have been noticed?
 
Robert Prey said:
Of course. But that wasn't the question. All you have to do to get a palm print on a rifle is to put the palm on the rifle.
Click to expand...

Actually it was the question.
See Border Reiver's post as to why your answer is nothing of the sort.
 
my Prey we know who did, it was Lee Harvey oswald, no one else......ther was and is no monster conspiracy.

There was one genuine political conspiracy Watergate, and guess what thats been proved with hard real evidence...and a whistle blower.

So instad of chasing phantoms and fantasys discuss something real.
 
Not a "fact" but a conclusion unsupported by any facts. Anyone can state a conclusion:

It was a shooter on the grassy knoll

or

the CIA did it

or

There were multiple shooters.

See how easy it is to be a low information poster? Such persons have no need of "facts."
Click to expand...

Yep, pretty much. :D
 
Robert Prey said:
Yes indeed, Jargon. That photo-shopped photo is indeed lie. But a lie committed by Robo. You didn't know that?
Click to expand...

What if we found 40 witnesses who claimed you posted it to show "how easy films could be manipulated" or some such. Would that make them expert photo witnesses and prove you had lied by posting the picture in response to a direct call for evidence?
 
Robert Prey said:
No contradiction or Cherry Picking at all, Sherlock. It's the FBI's statements that are contradictory which implicates the FBI as a conspirator in the cover-up.
Click to expand...

But you weren't presenting these sources as evidence that the FBI provides contradictory information, you were presenting it as evidence that there were no legitimate fingerprints on the rifle.

Don't try to confuse the issue, please, and also lay off the snarky nicknames.
 
Robert Prey said:
Of course. But that wasn't the question. All you have to do to get a palm print on a rifle is to put the palm on the rifle.
Click to expand...

Your own source, a fingerprinting expert, said that because the rifle was in poor condition, it was difficult to leave a print on it. And that's with a LIVE person secreting sweat and oil, not a dead body.

Do you reject this source now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom