Miracle of the Shroud / Blood on the shroud

[Akri]

humans with blood have been around since the 1st century.

A tad longer than that, in fact

 

[Filippo Lippi]

Hey, Jabba, are they referring to you at this link?

http://discussions.godandscience.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=225&p=129910&hilit=jabba#p129910

 

[pakeha]

Nice find, Fillippo Lippi.
I read a bit of the thread and was surprised to see the folk there never mention the ¹⁴C dating.

ETA
That linked thread picks up in interest at page 31

 

[catsmate]

Nice find, Fillippo Lippi.
I read a bit of the thread and was surprised to see the folk there never mention the ¹⁴C dating.

ETA
That linked thread picks up in interest at page 31

Wow there's a lot of crap being spouted there. McCrone didn't find organic material? No successful re-creation of the shroud...............
Those people are either in terminal denial of reality or haven't bothered to do even the most basic research.

 

[pakeha]

Yeah. They still seem to believe in the 'invisible patch' thingie.
Amazing.

 

[zooterkin]

To quote Justin Timperlake, cry me a river.

[nitpick]
I believe it's Timberlake. However, that's largely irrelevant, since the Julie London song of the same name is vastly superior.



(Does JT's song have a couplet remotely approaching

...
Told me love was too plebeian
Told me you were through with me and
...

? )

 

[pakeha]

Indeed, zooterkin.

And now for something completely different, there's Airbourne's version of the same text (cry me a river) in the song "Running Wild":

 

[Jabba]

Hey, Jabba, are they referring to you at this link?

http://discussions.godandscience.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=225&p=129910&hilit=jabba#p129910

Filippo,
- My browsers can't find that link.
--- Jabba

 

[Filippo Lippi]

It may have gone, don't let it distract you from providing that evidence you promised.

 

[abaddon]

Filippo,
- My browsers can't find that link.
--- Jabba

Funny enough, me either. Possibly one of those links barred by geography. Or not, as others seem to be able to get it. I know I can't see it,much as it might be interesting. Possibly a malformed URL? Yay Jabba, we agree on something.

 

[Slowvehicle]

Funny enough, me either. Possibly one of those links barred by geography. Or not, as others seem to be able to get it. I know I can't see it,much as it might be interesting. Possibly a malformed URL? Yay Jabba, we agree on something.

I can't open it either, or any of the links to that site.

 

[The Norseman]

Nameserver trace for discussions.godandscience.org:
Looking for who is responsible for root zone and followed d.root-servers.net.
Looking for who is responsible for org and followed b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
Looking for who is responsible for godandscience.org and followed ns1.godandscience.org.

Nameservers for discussions.godandscience.org:
ns1.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)
ns2.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)

 

[dafydd]

Yeah. They still seem to believe in the 'invisible patch' thingie.
Amazing.

If it's invisible then how do they know that it is there?

 

[pakeha]

^
Because a pro-authenticity guru says so?

Nameserver trace for discussions.godandscience.org:
Looking for who is responsible for root zone and followed d.root-servers.net.
Looking for who is responsible for org and followed b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
Looking for who is responsible for godandscience.org and followed ns1.godandscience.org.

Nameservers for discussions.godandscience.org:
ns1.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)
ns2.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)

What a pity.
The discussion there was ongoing til yesterday. I'm glad to have read it.

 

[catsmate]

Filippo,
- My browsers can't find that link.
--- Jabba

Funny enough, me either. Possibly one of those links barred by geography. Or not, as others seem to be able to get it. I know I can't see it,much as it might be interesting. Possibly a malformed URL? Yay Jabba, we agree on something.

I can't open it either, or any of the links to that site.

Nameserver trace for discussions.godandscience.org:
Looking for who is responsible for root zone and followed d.root-servers.net.
Looking for who is responsible for org and followed b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
Looking for who is responsible for godandscience.org and followed ns1.godandscience.org.

Nameservers for discussions.godandscience.org:
ns1.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)
ns2.godandscience.org returned (SERVFAIL)

Yep the domain is experiencing a little downtime according to Netcraft.

 

[Filippo Lippi]

It may have gone, don't let it distract you from providing that evidence you promised.

Oh, you did.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

e. I may be wasting time with this preface (as I'm sure that you guys believe), but it is in an effort to figure out how best to deal with so many opponents, questions and comments in a timely manner when I haven’t kept good track of the relevant material I’ve been reading (not really “studying” until recently) over the last 40(?) years.

But you do keep track of it all now, now that people in this thread have helpfully shown you exactly how you can, right?

 

[Multivac]

If it's invisible then how do they know that it is there?

The invisible pink Unicorn told them.

 

[The Norseman]

Ah! How majestic this wreck! I love the slow-motion destruction of the fake shroud and all its 'glory'.

 

[abaddon]

Filippo,
- My browsers can't find that link.
--- Jabba

Works for me now. Funny your god could not fix it right up.