• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

You're flailing about now - toothbrushes and screwdrivers? Try to stick to the topic.

That is the topic. You implied that what a wing is designed to do determines what it can do.

And yet you believe a wing designed to convert airflow to lift becomes a penetrating missile cabable to slice through dozens of steel box columns if it goes fast enough. This doesn't bode well for the gene pool.

Which, honestly, even children know is wrong.

And, I note, you have no actual evidence, other than your personal incredulity, that the wing wouldn't penetrate. Nothing empirical.

<SNIP>

My prime objective is to expose the truth, whatever it is. What's yours?

I like how you deliberately ignore the main point to address the BTW.

I can tell you, but if you won't give me the courtesy of watching the video, why should I answer your question?

So he has to watch the video before you can tell him what's in the video.

:dl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Incredulity, ad hominem. And, yes, I do believe a wing with sufficient velocity and the right type of construction, both of which I believe were present on 9/11, would be able to and did sever the exterior columns of WTC 1 and 2, regardless of what it was originally designed for. I can use an iron as an effective bludgeon, if need be, and screwdrivers and toothbrushes are often used as murder weapons. Also:

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/xpUBswX.jpg[/qimg]

This probably wasn't in the design specs for that car.

Also, quote-mining now? Are you sure you're not Ergo?


We already said we have no problem with him doing it. We have a problem with him not revealing his math until he does it, however, especially since he now admits he doesn't have any.




I'd like to introduce you to something called a Stundie.




No one asked you to give us your name.



Funny. You dropped the question of pressure and energy all of a sudden, because you know MIT clearly calculated that. MIT clearly said they didn't crunch the numbers because they couldn't simulate it in enough detail.



It can and has been proven one way or another without the test. Using math. Which you refuse to do. Because you can't.

On the other hand, you've effectively admitted your "layman's terms" explanations from earlier weren't because you were dumbing it down for the masses, but because you are unable or unwilling to perform more complex analyses.

Isn't it a wee bit hypocritical to demand others use math to prove their case, but you don't have to?

hehe here's a whole bunch of things that Steve here thinks is impossible:
https://www.google.com/search?q=car...nIPTy0QGywIG4Dw&ved=0CDAQsAQ&biw=1519&bih=741
 
Does the video contain your math? If it does, reproduce it here, if it doesn't then don't bother.

It's full of lies and fantasies. I think 90% of truthers are single males and somehow, in their warped minds, this crap is impressive to women.

Steve, comment?
 
And it did. Show where he denies this.

If you believe what we're told it also severed 37 steel columns and a few spandrels and therein lies the rub. Jets can't do that and the crash test will prove it.

If you were so certain a jet can do such a thing, why are so many of you so threatened by this test? You should be throwing money at me to get it done.
 
A pilot would know the jet would get creamed.

He's not a pilot, because he doesn't do things you say pilots would do, therefore he's not a pilot.

Say, where were the hundreds of thousands of pilots calling BS? And the hundreds of thousands of engineers calling BS at NIST's report? AE911T can only scare up a bare dozen or so thousand members, which make up less than 0.1% of the world's population of both professions. Pilots for 911 Truth? All of 300 members or so.

And still more quote-mining. Tsk tsk.
 
Ours is to help stop your retarded ideas (and others like it) from poisoning minds. The more you post, the worse your ideas look to rational people.

The only people who could be threatened by this test are those who know what the results will be.
 
The jet and the columns creamed each other.

Indicating your confusion with material densities and basic physics.

To sum up - all you plane-huggers don't have a leg to stand on. You cry about math and physics but can't produce anything to support your beliefs, whereas I am prepared to put my money and reputation on the line to publish the math and physics, as well as an empirical test to support mine.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom