JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tomtomkent said:
This has been discussed at length. The findings of the autopsy have been discussed at length. How your own quotes are compatible with the drawings have been dicussed at length. Nobody feels a need to repeat themselves.
Click to expand...

You can't repeat what you have never provided, namely medical witnesses that affirm the wounds depicted in the fictional drawings by Mr.Rydberg, used to deceive the Warren Commission.

(Crickets still chirping).
 
Evidence?

The volumes of the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee on Assasinations provide plenty of first-hand evidence.
 
Robert Prey said:
You can't repeat what you have never provided, namely medical witnesses that affirm the wounds depicted in the fictional drawings by Mr.Rydberg, used to deceive the Warren Commission.

(Crickets still chirping).
Click to expand...

So no discussion of the autopsy or other evidence that matches those drawings has been provided in the last 200 pages?

Wrong. I have even shown how your own selection of quotes affirm the findings
 
Robert Prey said:
Don't fillibuster. Provide the medical witnesses that affirm the fictional Rydberg drawings or admit you have none.

(Crickets still chirping)
Click to expand...

Asked answered and ignored in the past.

Supply objective evidence of any form to support your claim or find something new to say.
 
Robert Prey said:
(Crickets still chirping)
Click to expand...
Robert Prey said:
(Crickets still chirping)
Click to expand...
Robert Prey said:
(Crickets still chirping)
Click to expand...

Stop trying to claim victory and show me where I "claim victory with every post." Your goalposts, not mine.

No more doctoring my quotes. No more backpedaling. No more trying to shame me because I don't live up to the straw-man life you try to paste on me. Evidence, please, or retract the personal accusation.
 
Tomtomkent said:
So no discussion of the autopsy or other evidence that matches those drawings has been provided in the last 200 pages?

Wrong. I have even shown how your own selection of quotes affirm the findings
Click to expand...

I concur this has been done many times in this thread. Robert simply ignores it, leaves for a few weeks or months, then comes back to start the discussion again and pretends none of that rebuttal ever occurred. His demand that we do it all over again to benefit his argument is self-serving and disingenuous.
 
vtbub said:
Evidence?

The volumes of the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee on Assasinations provide plenty of first-hand evidence.
Click to expand...

But none that you nor anyone else can cite that affirms the depicted wounds shown in the fictional Rydberg drawings used to dupe the WC along with the deep thinkers on this thread.
 
Tomtomkent said:
So no discussion of the autopsy or other evidence that matches those drawings has been provided in the last 200 pages?

Wrong. I have even shown how your own selection of quotes affirm the findings
Click to expand...

Yeah, right. For example:

Diana Bowron, Parkland Hospital nurse. "There was a gaping wound in the back of his head. It was gone.
Gone. There was nothing there. Just a big gaping hole..."

You affirmation? Why that gaping wound in the back of his head is the dime sized entry wound shown in the Rydberg drawing.

Typical of your "affirmations" of all the medical witnesses.
 
Robert Prey said:
But none that you nor anyone else can cite that affirms the depicted wounds shown in the fictional Rydberg drawings used to dupe the WC along with the deep thinkers on this thread.
Click to expand...

And yet that has been done already.
Why the need for repetition?
Perhaps you have not read the autopsy? What else need be supplied to confirm this?
testemony from the WC was supplied and discussed. You called a whitewash and supplied no objective evidence that it was a whitewash.

How about you say something new, or supply some objective evidence?
 
Robert Prey said:
Yeah, right. For example:

Diana Bowron, Parkland Hospital nurse. "There was a gaping wound in the back of his head. It was gone.
Gone. There was nothing there. Just a big gaping hole..."

You affirmation? Why that gaping wound in the back of his head is the dime sized entry wound shown in the Rydberg drawing.

Typical of your "affirmations" of all the medical witnesses.
Click to expand...

Yep. The back of his head had a gaping wound where a portion had been blasted away. Like in the WC illustration and autopsy photos?

That would be the back of his head resting on his gurney for the duration of JFKs time at Parkland. So we know which area she would have been able to see was missing..

Asked, answered and now repeated.

Still relying on subjective interpretation of subjective description?
 
Coming: Mystery Witness Tells All

l. Why did the autopsy doctors go along with a lie?

2. Who put them up to it?

3. Was DR.Humes really just a pencil pusher with no clue as to what he was doing?

4. Who controlled the entire autopsy conclusions?

5. Did Harold Rydberg knowingly concoct a lie with his fictional drawings?

6.Where did the fatal head shot actually enter Kennedy's head?

7. What about that so-called Pristine bullet?

8. Was the statement that Dr. Humes gave to the Warren commission a slip of the tongue, or a clue left for posterity? What was the real meaning behind this quote:

"Scientifically, sir, it is impossible for it to have been fired from other than behind. Or to have exited from other than behind." -- Dr. Humes to WC

9. Who benefitted most from the cover-up?

10. Have any of the principles retracted their findings?
 
Tomtomkent said:
Yep. The back of his head had a gaping wound where a portion had been blasted away. Like in the WC illustration and autopsy photos?

That would be the back of his head resting on his gurney for the duration of JFKs time at Parkland. So we know which area she would have been able to see was missing..
Click to expand...

Wrong again:

"I first saw the large wound in the back of the head in the car. When we were preparing the body for the coffin I had the opportunity to examine it more closely. It was about five inches in diameter and there was no flap of skin covering it, just a fraction of skin along part of the edges of bone. There was, however, some hair hanging down from the top of the head, which was caked with blood, and most of the brain was missing. The wound was so large I could almost put my whole left fist inside." (Livingstone, Killing the Truth, p. 181) She also said, "...The hole was basically almost the size of a saucer, and sort of from the occiput. So there was quite a reasonable amount missing from the top as well." (Livingstone, Killing the Truth, p. 190) When asked her opinion of the nature of the defect in the rear of the skull, Bowron told Livingstone, "Well, to me it was an exit hole."
 
76,000+ medical witnesses debunk your puny 40. LHO and LHO alone shot and killed JFK.
 
Robert Prey said:
l. Why did the autopsy doctors go along with a lie?

2. Who put them up to it?

3. Was DR.Humes really just a pencil pusher with no clue as to what he was doing?

4. Who controlled the entire autopsy conclusions?

5. Did Harold Rydberg knowingly concoct a lie with his fictional drawings?

6.Where did the fatal head shot actually enter Kennedy's head?

7. What about that so-called Pristine bullet?

8. Was the statement that Dr. Humes gave to the Warren commission a slip of the tongue, or a clue left for posterity? What was the real meaning behind this quote:

"Scientifically, sir, it is impossible for it to have been fired from other than behind. Or to have exited from other than behind." -- Dr. Humes to WC

9. Who benefitted most from the cover-up?

10. Have any of the principles retracted their findings?
Click to expand...

Robert, before you start building a house, make sure you have the foundation done first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom