Shooting at Texas college

What narrative? Are you focusing on my use of the word "crazy"?

It beyond frustrating that this is just continually chalked up to "bad apples" instead of a systemic problem of easy access to deadly weapons.

But here we are again with another day, another crazy person shoots people over real or imagined slights.

I think it was the "chalked up to" part and the "easy access to weapons" part that I reacted to. Granted, bad apple is probably warranted whenever there's a shooter, but it seemed half-cocked without knowing much about what actually happened. I see now that any gun-related homicide could be made to fit, unless it's the unlikely case he was a cop defending himself against a knife or something.

Side note: do people still know what "half-cocked" means?
 
Last edited:
Police just gave the shortest press conference in history! 3 people shot and a 4th had a heart attack. One of the injured may be one of the shooters. They are searching for the 2nd shooter.
 
CNN has stopped showing live images because it's an "active situation." Looks like every cop in Texas has arrived on the scene.

I suspect it's more because nothing is "happening".

The local station is still streaming live, but they are mostly interviewing earwitnesses and replaying earlier helicopter footage.

Early reports of police searching a "wooded area" north of the school seem to be referring to a (heavily-tree-shaded) residential area, not woods as such.
 
I think it was the "chalked up to" part and the "easy access to weapons" part that I reacted to. Granted, bad apple is probably warranted whenever there's a shooter, but it seemed half-cocked without knowing much about what actually happened. I see now that any gun-related homicide could be made to fit, unless it's the unlikely case he was a cop defending himself against a knife or something.

Side note: do people still know what "half-cocked" means?

I do, and I stand by what I wrote. It's frustrating to me that we've had 4 shooting threads for incidences that occurred this week, but each time, the incident is "chalked up" to simply a crazy person abusing rights that "normal" people adhere to, and in fact we have a couple people here blaming "gun free" zones as if whoever did this shooting had any care about that. The simple equation is still, and will always be, that if this guy (and it's always, always a guy) had not been able to get hold of a gun, this wouldn't have happened. So yes, let's not go off half-cocked and assume that another crazy/disgruntled/bullied/very young shooter could have been stopped with some restrictions on the free flow of weaponry.
 
I bet if we ban the type of gun that wasn't used we could prevent this!

And 2 people shooting at each other? That usually means a gang feud where I live.
 
According to police it was two people shooting at each other, only one of whom got shot (along with two innocent bystanders). I have a feeling if there had been more people present with guns the casualty rate would be higher, and not merely by "1 gunman".
 
And 2 people shooting at each other? That usually means a gang feud where I live.

Gang members aren't human and it's no big deal if they shoot at each other; so we can safely discount incidents of shootings involving gang members as irrelevant to the wider gun debate.
 
But concealed carry! Why didn't anyone shoot the other two? I mean, it should have been obvious which of the two people shooting was the right target!
 
Gang members aren't human and it's no big deal if they shoot at each other; so we can safely discount incidents of shootings involving gang members as irrelevant to the wider gun debate.
I'm sure the gangbangers strictly abide by all laws and regulations. They'll be the first ones to register their weapons.
 
Hopefully one of the shooters was a good, God-fearing, NRA card-carrying CCW'er who prevented any further injuries or deaths with their superb tactical skills, situational awareness and considerable firearms safety training.

If only there were more guns. After all, more guns means less crime.
 
It's just sad that there must've been dozens of individuals with car keys present during the incident, and yet none of them was able to help subdue the gunmen.
 

Back
Top Bottom