It doesn't fly, Jabba. I understand that the time you can devote to this is limited; it is limited for all of us. I also understand that the time available shrinks or varies and is not constant. It happens to all of us.- I only have so much time for this -- which keeps shrinking (give me a PM if you want to hear my excuses) -- and, this is what I do for fun, so I naturally give it as much time as reasonable, at least.
- Then note that essentially all my posts are responses to your questions, accusations and comments otherwise. No one should be insulted by my lack of attention to their qac's -- I'm attending to as much as I have time for which to attend.
- And then, I've asked you to elect some sort of "gatekeeper" to tell me which qac to answer next, but you won't do it. If you did, you'd see that I would totally follow your lead (for half of my time at least).
- Does anyone here actually see my point (in a non-sarcastic way)?
--- Jabba
But there are things that have been repeatedly pointed out that you repeatedly fail to address:
1. You waste your available time on telling us what you will do when you could in fact spend your time on actually doing it.
2. You waste your time and ours by telling us you will tell us why you have no time to tell us anything if we will simply ask via pm. There is no conceivable circumstance in which this is anything but a complete waste of your limited time as well as a complete and obvious avoidance of the issues.
3. You neither need nor get to demand a gatekeeper. Despite the numerous posters here, the objections and questions are actually fairly limited.
4. You, and you alone, are the one who goes off on tangents and fails to focus your efforts on the core topics. You raised the Heller and Adler paper. People here read it (something you still have failed to do). Those people gave pointed and concise comments. Your response was to ignore those comments and repost summarized drivel that had already been addressed.
There's more, Jabba, but the cause of your problems is you. Nobody else. You should actually be grateful because in all your 20 years of research none of your fellow Shroudies has ever gotten you to look at the primary papers. It is only the skeptics here who have done that.
Doesn't that tell you something, Jabba? It is the skeptics and not the believers who are willing to look at the source papers and at the primary evidence? Everything, every last bit of evidence that you have posted and which you got from believer sites is secondary summaries which have been repeatedly shown to be inaccurate in their characterizations of the actual papers.
Dump your self-pity; it is not deserved.