• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The election was stolen/rigged!

You mean the guy who had to deal with a Republican Congress???

Last guy in office WAS a Republican with a Republican Congress. No balanced budget and the financial meltdown occured ON HIS WATCH!
He took your military on one justifiable war but failed UTTERLY to complete his objective there, a task that had to be finished by his successor, and also into another unjustifiable war where he spent billions and accomplished next to nothing.
Hey wasn't Iraq supposed to pay for itself?

Since then the present POTUS lent money to your automakers who have since paid it back and KEPT their employees working, when your firends wanted to lay them all off and send GM and Dodge to bankruptcy.
Must have all had stock in Ford!
 
Last edited:
I have no proof.

FTFY.

I take it from your continued and blatantly partisan political rant that you have abandoned any semblance of objective proof for your claims that the 2012 Presidential election has been materially rigged or stolen.

You have failed to show that unanimous precincts were the result of anything other than a unanimous vote, despite widely varying and contradictory claims.

You have failed to show that your tabloid claims of sabotaged voting machines is even remotely credible.

Indeed it is far likely, given your pending meltdown, that all those beliefs are simply wishful thinking to justify your desired political alignment and politically-motivated beliefs. Shall we just assume that the rest of your contribution this thread will be a long partisan diatribe?
 
FTFY.

I take it from your continued and blatantly partisan political rant that you have abandoned any semblance of objective proof for your claims that the 2012 Presidential election has been materially rigged or stolen.

You have failed to show that unanimous precincts were the result of anything other than a unanimous vote, despite widely varying and contradictory claims.

You have failed to show that your tabloid claims of sabotaged voting machines is even remotely credible.

Indeed it is far likely, given your pending meltdown, that all those beliefs are simply wishful thinking to justify your desired political alignment and politically-motivated beliefs. Shall we just assume that the rest of your contribution this thread will be a long partisan diatribe?

Indeed, while I mentioned in response to his post, that he has yet to illustrate any organized or widespread fraud , or for that matter to illustrate any fraud at all, he chose instead to rail on off topic.

My shame is that I took that bait.
 
Last guy in office WAS a Republican with a Republican Congress. No balanced budget and the financial meltdown occured ON HIS WATCH!

Since then the present POTUS lent money to your automakers who have since paid it back and KEPT their employees working, when your firends wanted to lay them all off and send GM and Dodge to bankruptcy.
Must have all had stock in Ford!

A RINO is nothing but a Liberal Democrat turned inside out. I do not defend RINOs.
 
They are ? How do you figure that Robert?
How do you figure that ICBM's protect Canada?
Explain yourself.

I see you have NO retort to the FACT that Canadian banks, heavily regulated, managed to all survive and survive with profits, while your banks went down the drain.

No. That is one of the positive attributes about Canada. Now why don't your Universities allow Ann Coulter to speak??????
 
Europeans laugh at the US...

Other countries are quite relieved that Obama was re-elected, as they got a "taste" of Romney's foreign policy "expertise" during the campaign.

So there's another LIE you've told.

Why can't you make your "point" without lying??
 
...given your pending meltdown...

Yes...he appears to be getting worse.


No worries...soon this thread (or a portion, thereof) will simply disappear, and Robert will have "learned" nothing from this exchange.


...and then the whole thing will start again...which is actually good, as it makes me all the more appreciate internet forums where this type of foolishness isn't allowed.
 
put an "H" in there and I will know wtf you are talking about.

So you did not like GWB, not Republican enough for you.

Who would be Republican enough for you?
Gotta love the "No true Scotsman" arguement.
Any facts that are inconvenient can safely be shunted aside simply because one does not like it using such an arguement.
Of course if one wishes to remain honest and use logic and reason instead one might have a better chance at being taken seriously. Whcih of course bodes ill for Robert.

Better question for Robert is perhaps who was the 'true' Republican who oversaw a balanced budeget?

Then again there is another question that remains open to this day. What well researched evidence is there that any organized, widespread voter fraud was committed during this last USA Federal election?

So far we have the cherry pickings that a tabloid printed.
In that Robert opines that if there were precincts in which Romney got no votes it must be fraud.
That of course is not a valid assumption with such relatively small and cherry picked samples. Let alone the fact that it is pure speculation based soley on the result rather than any actual evidence of changed votes. He shows us an anecdote about vote changes that has more holes in it than a sieve, as pointed out to him by several posters here.

I am sure that Robert can find us the well researched articles written that compare all precincts all across the nation and see how many voted unanimously in one way or the other. Given that Obama won the popular vote and the electoral college I would not be the least bit surprised at a few more of these outliers on his side but I believe that I can safely state that the number going each way will be close to 50/50.
 
Last edited:
I bought a Chevy last year Robert. They certainly are still in business. Your guy wanted to let them sink and lay people off.
That's fact Robert, live with it.

Still waiting, I suppose Robert may have left for the day, for evidence that the loans to GM did not save it from Bankruptcy, save American (and Canadian) jobs, was not repaid,
OR conversly,
that GM went into bankruptcy and I did not actually purchase a Chevy last November since they were out of business.

Or perhaps RP was trying to say that Romney did not state that GM should, be allowed to fail and lay off thousands, and close thousands of dealerships?

RP wants a list of why Romney failed....
Where do we start?
How about with his claims that the stimulus picked too many 'losers' when Bain Capital had a worse record than the stimulus in picking winners/losers.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom