Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
Peter May said:
This is my final attempt to set the record straight.
I have been engaged against those who seek to discredit NASA for about 10 years....

Replying to the article
Peter May 2012-07-07


snip wall o' text
Click to expand...

Why do you back up a claim of a ten year engagement with quote from a few months ago?
 
I will be happy to answer questions on the refutation below.
Click to expand...

Where did this alleged conversation take place? It is not on Aulis. Was this private e-mail correspondence?
 
For the record, Mr. May responded to my question by private message. This is it, in its entirety:

Pitfalls in English
Where did this alleged conversation take place? It is not on Aulis. Was this private e-mail correspondence

Well first I do not recall mentioning that this was a conversation, so I could not have alleged that it was. Therefore how could it have taken place somewhere?
If it had been the basis for my posting, I would have informed you that it was a transcript, a transcript is a written record of spoken language. OK. But you already knew that, right?

Aulis does not have a forum, so it could not have been posted there could it!

So I invite you to use what you think serves you as a brain, and have a guess, who do you think the mail was sent to.
I can give you a clue, (D.P) and it is one of the following.

The Royal Institute for the witless
Aulis Online
MI 6 Deputy Proctor
If you need any help, please let me know.

Best regards
Peter
Don’t forget, as I tell the Apollo hoaxers,
It is very important to understand the nature of what we see, and not what we want to see.
P.S. I understand there are many posting on the JREF forum who do not have English as a first language, it is therefore important to post a few details about ones self.
Click to expand...

Not much of an answer Mr. May.
 
DJW001 said:
For the record, Mr. May responded to my question by private message.

<snip>
Don’t forget, as I tell the Apollo hoaxers,
It is very important to understand the nature of what we see, and not what we want to see.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Just who are these "Apollo hoaxers," Peter?
 
DJW001 said:
For the record, Mr. May responded to my question by private message. This is it, in its entirety:



Not much of an answer Mr. May.
Click to expand...



You have not asked for, nor have you received permission to post a private message from Peter May included in your posting 9104.
 
DJW001 said:
For the record, Mr. May responded to my question by private message. This is it, in its entirety:



Not much of an answer Mr. May.
Click to expand...

You have not asked for, nor have you received permission to post a private message from Peter May included in your posting 9104.
 
Peter May said:
You have not asked for, nor have you received permission to post a private message from Peter May included in your posting 9104.
Click to expand...

Peter May said:
You have not asked for, nor have you received permission to post a private message from Peter May included in your posting 9104.
Click to expand...

This double post style, I know I have seen it before. Anyone remember?
 
Peter May said:
You have not asked for, nor have you received permission to post a private message from Peter May included in your posting 9104.
Click to expand...

Why are you referring to yourself in the third person? And why resort to PM's to answer questions asked openly in the thread?
 
abaddon said:
This double post style, I know I have seen it before. Anyone remember?
Click to expand...

It does seem familiar. One must also wonder why a person would go to the trouble answering a question in a PM for a question asked in a public forum.
 
abaddon said:
This double post style, I know I have seen it before. Anyone remember?
Click to expand...

Humble apologies, I speak not for myself but for my provider Comvik. My wireless connection is slow, and I do not give the system sufficient time to "read" the message.
I have spoken to them at length, but they have no remedial solution.
 
frenat said:
It does seem familiar. One must also wonder why a person would go to the trouble answering a question in a PM for a question asked in a public forum.
Click to expand...


If this post is intended for me, I really do not understand you. If you care to read the PM again and perhaps rephrase your question.
 
Peter May said:
If this post is intended for me, I really do not understand you. If you care to read the PM again and perhaps rephrase your question.
Click to expand...

Rephrase what? You went to the extra effort to respond by PM to a question asked in the forum. How is that so hard to understand?
 
frenat said:
Rephrase what? You went to the extra effort to respond by PM to a question asked in the forum. How is that so hard to understand?
Click to expand...




Please read my post 9092 up to Gas Has Mass, OK.

Please read DJWOO1 post 9102, OK

No extra effort was required to send it as a PM. Where did you get the idea from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom