• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged US Supreme Court upholds Ohio early voting ruling

NotJesus

Unsaviory
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Messages
6,629
Location
Los Angeles
The Supremes have issued a one-sentence order upholding a ruling to allow early voting in Ohio over the last weekend before election day.

Big win for Obama.
 
Last edited:
You guys are quick. ;) This is great news for Obama - I don't see Romney faring well without Ohio.
 
Great.

Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting. Because actual voting was apparently waaaaaay too difficult of a process.

Surely though, this new system is still too difficult. Actually expecting people to plan for and expend energy in the voting process will disenfranchise somebody somewhere. I propose a new system, which will ensure full participation:

- the government installs a microphone in the home of all citizens
- at any point from the inauguration of the current president through "election day", a citizen may elect to
- momentarily put down the Cheetos, Nintendo controller, and bong, then
- addressing the installed microphone, speak the name of their chosen candidate
- boom, voting complete
 
Really? Your objection is that this makes it too easy to vote?
 
Great.

Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting. Because actual voting was apparently waaaaaay too difficult of a process.

Surely though, this new system is still too difficult. Actually expecting people to plan for and expend energy in the voting process will disenfranchise somebody somewhere. I propose a new system, which will ensure full participation:

- the government installs a microphone in the home of all citizens
- at any point from the inauguration of the current president through "election day", a citizen may elect to
- momentarily put down the Cheetos, Nintendo controller, and bong, then
- addressing the installed microphone, speak the name of their chosen candidate
- boom, voting complete

You forgot to include literacy tests and poll taxes.
 
Great.

Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting. Because actual voting was apparently waaaaaay too difficult of a process.

Surely though, this new system is still too difficult. Actually expecting people to plan for and expend energy in the voting process will disenfranchise somebody somewhere. I propose a new system, which will ensure full participation:

- the government installs a microphone in the home of all citizens
- at any point from the inauguration of the current president through "election day", a citizen may elect to
- momentarily put down the Cheetos, Nintendo controller, and bong, then
- addressing the installed microphone, speak the name of their chosen candidate
- boom, voting complete

If voting is intended to accurately poll the preference of the electorate, in what way would your proposed system be bad?
 
Since when do conservatives want an accurate measure of anything?

I know. But really, how is this microphone system different from vote-by-mail in Oregon? Or in the near future, hopefully, voting online?

We can do our taxes online. We can do our banking online. We can get degrees online. Why not voting? Why wouldn't that be amazing and wonderful?

And why are "conservatives" against anything that gets more people to participate in elections?
 
I know. But really, how is this microphone system different from vote-by-mail in Oregon? Or in the near future, hopefully, voting online?

We can do our taxes online. We can do our banking online. We can get degrees online. Why not voting? Why wouldn't that be amazing and wonderful?

And why are "conservatives" against anything that gets more people to participate in elections?

I'll say it again. Because it lets " THOSE PEOPLE" vote.
 
Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting.
LOL, thank you for this hilarious bit of idiocy!
 
The Supremes have issued a one-sentence order upholding a ruling to allow early voting in Ohio over the last weekend before election day.

Big win for Obama.

Suck it, GOP.

BAM :D

ETA: Oh yeah, I almost forgot... JUDICIAL ACTIVISM!!!11!1 :jaw-dropp
 
Last edited:
Great.

Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting. Because actual voting was apparently waaaaaay too difficult of a process.

Surely though, this new system is still too difficult. Actually expecting people to plan for and expend energy in the voting process will disenfranchise somebody somewhere. I propose a new system, which will ensure full participation:

- the government installs a microphone in the home of all citizens
- at any point from the inauguration of the current president through "election day", a citizen may elect to
- momentarily put down the Cheetos, Nintendo controller, and bong, then
- addressing the installed microphone, speak the name of their chosen candidate
- boom, voting complete
Eats shoots and leaves.
 
Great.

Layabouts, slackjaws, stoners, and malcontents will now have ample time to stumble upon polling sites and lurch forward onto levers and buttons, deciding the future of the country. Hurrah for early voting. Because actual voting was apparently waaaaaay too difficult of a process.

Surely though, this new system is still too difficult. Actually expecting people to plan for and expend energy in the voting process will disenfranchise somebody somewhere. I propose a new system, which will ensure full participation:

- the government installs a microphone in the home of all citizens
- at any point from the inauguration of the current president through "election day", a citizen may elect to
- momentarily put down the Cheetos, Nintendo controller, and bong, then
- addressing the installed microphone, speak the name of their chosen candidate
- boom, voting complete

The ironing is delicious.
 
From the article in the OP:

... The justices rejected a bid by Ohio Republicans to limit the early voting on those days to members of the military. The rebuff came in a one-line order, with no published dissent. ...

DOUBLE-BAM :D :D
 
AWESOME.

If we had lost this, the election would have been thrown to Romney.

No, it just would have been much more difficult for President Obama to win Ohio. I think Obama would have taken Ohio anyway, it just would have been a lot closer.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom