Robert Prey
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 6,705
Ok.
Could you explain the link between autism & vaccines?
No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
Ok.
Could you explain the link between autism & vaccines?
Can I pick one?
No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
No, you don't get off that easily. You've been saying that for pages now and you haven't answered a single question when it's posed. You are being very dishonest.
Oh really? Then how do you even know about the Cutter Incident if "modern medicine" lies? Science and medicine are fallible. Are you trying to tell us that whatever it is you do isn't? Please share.
Este
No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
Provide peer reviewed evidence of that and we will have a go.
No studies have compared the incidence of autism in vaccinated, unvaccinated, or alternatively vaccinated children (i.e., schedules that spread out vaccines, avoid combination vaccines, or include only select vaccines). These studies would be difficult to perform because of the likely differences among these 3 groups in health care seeking behavior and the ethics of experimentally studying children who have not received vaccines.
OK, I'll go with India.Go for it.
I can't handle the existential emptiness anymore....
India. Dodge noted.
Re: India:
“In 2011, there were an extra 47500 new cases of NPAFP [in India]. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.”
"...Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of St. Stephens Hospital created the report after analyzing data from India’s 10-year-old National Polio Surveillance Project, which is available online. Their findings, which were published in the Indian Journal of medical Ethics, revealed that rates of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) have increased 1200% since the oral polio vaccine was introduced to India a decade ago."
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz27gL27Xx4
Some trade-off, eh? What else would you like to know about India?
It's almost as if you aren't really trying.India has been polio-free for a year
Re: India:
“In 2011, there were an extra 47500 new cases of NPAFP [in India]. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.”
"...Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of St. Stephens Hospital created the report after analyzing data from India’s 10-year-old National Polio Surveillance Project, which is available online. Their findings, which were published in the Indian Journal of medical Ethics, revealed that rates of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) have increased 1200% since the oral polio vaccine was introduced to India a decade ago."
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz27gL27Xx4
Some trade-off, eh? What else would you like to know about India?
I wasn't aware there was a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated.No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
After adjustment for potential confounders, the relative risk of autistic disorder in the group of vaccinated children, as compared with the unvaccinated group, was 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.24), and the relative risk of another autistic-spectrum disorder was 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.07). There was no association between the age at the time of vaccination, the time since vaccination, or the date of vaccination and the development of autistic disorder. [http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021134]
For vaccination generally, I can't find any good evidence regarding incidence of autism in those vaccinated vs those unvaccinated. Probably because these studies would be difficult to perform because of the likely differences among the groups in health care seeking behavior and the ethics of experimentally studying children who have not received vaccines.1010 cases (78.1%) had MMR vaccination recorded before diagnosis, compared with 3671 controls (82.1%) before the age at which their matched case was diagnosed. After adjustment for age at joining the database, the odds ratio for association between MMR and pervasive developmental disorder was 0.86 (95% CI 0.68-1.09). [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15364187]
That's interesting.Re: India:
“In 2011, there were an extra 47500 new cases of NPAFP [in India]. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.”
"...Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of St. Stephens Hospital created the report after analyzing data from India’s 10-year-old National Polio Surveillance Project, which is available online. Their findings, which were published in the Indian Journal of medical Ethics, revealed that rates of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) have increased 1200% since the oral polio vaccine was introduced to India a decade ago."
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz27gL27Xx4
Some trade-off, eh? What else would you like to know about India?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331818/Number of cases registered as AFP is showing significant increase from 8,500 cases in 2003 to over 40,000 cases per year starting from 2007 onwards, regardless of the number of actual confirmed polio cases [6]. This rise in AFP cases is attributed to significant improvements in the quality of the surveillance system [8].
So what are you twelve?No. You pick one.
There is zero evidence of that. But I'm aflutter over what you think is evidence and will be providing shortly.No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
Clay has Chevys, you have Dodges. What an odd pattern.The fallible nature of Modern Medicine and of human beings in general is good reason when considering whether to vaccinate, to Think Twice.
...
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz27gL27Xx4
Some trade-off, eh? What else would you like to know about India?
Re: India:
“In 2011, there were an extra 47500 new cases of NPAFP [in India]. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.”
"...Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of St. Stephens Hospital created the report after analyzing data from India’s 10-year-old National Polio Surveillance Project, which is available online. Their findings, which were published in the Indian Journal of medical Ethics, revealed that rates of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) have increased 1200% since the oral polio vaccine was introduced to India a decade ago."
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz27gL27Xx4
Some trade-off, eh? What else would you like to know about India?
No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
No. But can you explain the link of a very much smaller incidence of autism amongst the non-vaccinated?
The fallible nature of Modern Medicine and of human beings in general is good reason when considering whether to vaccinate, to Think Twice.
One question at a time, please.
One question at a time, please.
The unfortunate victims of vaccine disasters such at The Cutter Incident
bear witness to the fact that Modern Medicine often makes mistakes and often lies about vaccine safety.
I don't address generalized questions about "countries". But name one.
The fallible nature of Modern Medicine and of human beings in general is good reason when considering whether to vaccinate, to Think Twice.