Most of the comments are too stupid to reply to. The video links I've supplied explain the problems with and the possible consequences of vaccines.
You have been asked several times now to explain, in your own words(not link us to someone else's words) EXACTLY what it is that is wrong with vaccines in general and what is specifically wrong with the administration of 9 at once.
You wave away all such requests which one must assume means that you cannot answer the question. If you do not comnprehend your videos or links well enough to summarise their claims then why should we believe you?
The most moronic are those that insist there are no problems with vaccines.
I seem to have read many people including myself who have acknowledged that there are possible reactions to these substances BUT BUT BUT that the vast good done by the administration of them versus the low probability of any reaction at all and the miniscule probability of severe or tragic reaction, compels one to acknowledge that they are of huge benefit to a population.
It's obvious that the people of my generation are healthier than subsequent generations. As in Asthma.
You have been asked time and again to explain claims such as these. Simply pointing to an increase in reported cases of asthma and the incidence of vaccination just won't cut it. You NEED to account for all other possible factors Clayton.
The human body is a complex operation. You can't expect it to react to injection of disease in the same manner as ingestion or inhalation.
If something is admitted to the bloodstream by being absorbed through the lining of the lungs of through the lining of the intestines or stomach, how does that differ, other than in speed, from injection into a vein?
Or is this yet another case of Clayton not being competant to answer a question?
Vaccines are pot luck. There is no chain of custody. Even the so called "normal/acceptable" reactions to vaccines such as fever or seizures should scream "danger Will Robinson."
What do you mean 'chain of custody'. You implying a conspiracy to contaminate otherwise good vaccines? Flesh that one out even a little Clayton.
Also explain exactly why low probability of moderate or severe reaction should cause a ban on all vaccination.
The biggest problem with vaccines is that the healthiest children and the least healthy children are required to get them.
There is no health threshold test.
No, in fact the warnings are quite explicit concerning various contraindicated conditions such as egg allergies for instance.
Plus there is no benchmark that regularly measures the heath of a child. Which means the medical community has no idea whether their vaccine mania is to the detriment/weakening the species.
You are now advocating gov't mandated socialized medicine are you Clayton?
As for whether it is a detriment or benefit to the species, the fact that smallpox was erradicated from the face of the Earth by a program of vaccination, the fact that polio is poised to follow smallpox ( and possibly would have by now had it not been for anti-vax crusaders), the fact that diptheria, whooping cough and measles have been greatly reduced specifically due to vaccination programs would indicate a benefit to society.
