Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

[Montag451]

You mean the explosives mounted on the facade? That could have easily been camouflaged. As for the explosion, I have posted a video earlier in this thread which shows the explosion without a plane.

How could you camouflage explosives on the outside of the building?

 

[Clayton Moore]

But since no explosives existed, this is sort of irrelevant. IF explosives existed, why use planes?

Without the "planes" it would be obviously an inside job. duuuuuuuuuuuh

If the towers were to be brought down with explosives, there would be no need of planes, fake or not.

Without the "planes" it would be obviously an inside job. duuuuuuuuuuuh

AND that was not necessary for the terrorists. Once they were in control of the planes, some degree of success was certain.

Unreal. Explosives required a foolproof false flag diversion. Physical planes would have had many areas open to possible failure.

 

[Montag451]

Without the "planes" it would be obviously an inside job. duuuuuuuuuuuh



Without the "planes" it would be obviously an inside job. duuuuuuuuuuuh





Unreal. Explosives required a foolproof false flag diversion. Physical planes would have had many areas open to possible failure.

But I thought it was almost impossible for these untrained terrorists to fly the plane with any accuracy or skill. So you have an inside job putting explosives in the towers and professional pilots having to be employed so that they could actually hit the towers, because if they didn't hit the towers it would look like n inside job.

You've convinced me. Honest. No really you have.





No you haven't

 

[beachnut]

... Unreal. Explosives required a foolproof false flag diversion. Physical planes would have had many areas open to possible failure.

Why do you brag about being without evidence and reason?

The Passengers on Flight 93 figured out 911 in minutes (something you can't do given the answers and 11 years) the Physical plane was flown into the ground by terrorists.

Your failed claims, what will you do now, 11 years of fantasy and failure.

 

[Clayton Moore]

But I thought it was almost impossible for these untrained terrorists to fly the plane with any accuracy or skill. So you have an inside job putting explosives in the towers and professional pilots having to be employed so that they could actually hit the towers, because if they didn't hit the towers it would look like n inside job.

You've convinced me. Honest. No really you have.





No you haven't

There were no planes.

 

[Clayton Moore]

I can always tell when I'm spot on by the high volume of nonsensical replies.

 

[Montag451]

There were no planes.

There is no spoon

Seriously (and sincerely) I am interested in what you think happened that day. I watched it on tv (in England) from about 5 minutes after the first plane hit, saw the video of the second plane. I am sure I saw a plane.

Could you outline your entire theory about what happened and when.

 

[Justin39640]

I can always tell when I'm spot on by the high volume of nonsensical replies.

Maybe it's the nonsensical ideas you promote that inspires many "what the ****?" responses from everyone who reads them.

 

[NoahFence]

There is no spoon

Seriously (and sincerely) I am interested in what you think happened that day. I watched it on tv (in England) from about 5 minutes after the first plane hit, saw the video of the second plane. I am sure I saw a plane.

Could you outline your entire theory about what happened and when.

He'll never say.

 

[Animal]

I can always tell when I'm spot on by the high volume of nonsensical replies.

Edited by Loss Leader: 

Deleted for Rules 0/12

 

[fess]

There were no planes.

Have you mentioned this to the FAA, United Airlines, American Airlines, the ATC controllers?

Oh, never mind. Don’t bother answering, I’ve read enough of your stupidity.

 

[MIKILLINI]

There were no planes.

There were planes AND passengers dude. A fact you can't avoid or hand-wave away.

 

[MIKILLINI]

I can always tell when I'm spot on by the high volume of nonsensical replies.

Judging by this nonsensical comment, your perception is spot off.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Rule #3 for conspiracy theorists: Any theory, no matter how superfluously complicated, can always be embellished by some further complication.

Hans

It's still a simple operation. Very precisely timed (including amateur footage and near-real-time manipulation of live television feeds), so a lot of careful planning but the event itself was simple without the need for real planes.

 

[Anders Lindman]

How could you camouflage explosives on the outside of the building?

Flat explosives painted with the same hue as the facade itself. I have even posted in other threads about how the inward bending could be created by mounting explosives inside the exterior steel columns.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

There were no planes.

Uh-oh.


ETA - As others have requested above, your alternate version of events s'il vous plait?

 

[brazenlilraisin]

I can always tell when I'm spot on by the high volume of nonsensical replies.

The sad, strange result of the message "maybe it's me" not being accurately relayed from one to another area of your cortex.

 

[dafydd]

Could you outline your entire theory about what happened and when.

Not a chance. Clayton has no theory, just the usual piecemeal truther guff.

 

[Andy_Ross]

So, what happened to the Planes, passengers and crews?

We never get an answer to this.

 

[dafydd]

So, what happened to the Planes, passengers and crews?

We never get an answer to this.

And you never will.