Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

[rational]

http://www.beaverintegrated.com/images/windows/highrise_1.png

What is that supposed to show me?

 

[rational]

http://www.beaverintegrated.com/images/windows/highrise_1.png

Can somebody help me out? What is in this photo that answers the question that I asked?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Can somebody help me out? What is in this photo that answers the question that I asked?

Window cleaners working on the outside of the building. If such a team mounted explosives that way, then that could have created the shapes of planes in the facades.

 

[rational]

Window cleaners working on the outside of the building. If such a team mounted explosives that way, then that could have created the shapes of planes in the facades.

LOL!!

And have you done the calculations to find out how much explosive (whatever type you propose) it would take to compromise each column?

 

[GlennB]

Window cleaners working on the outside of the building. If such a team mounted explosives that way, then that could have created the shapes of planes in the facades.

That was my theory! But it was a parody. because a load of explosives would have been stuck on the outside of the building and, errr......, that would be very silly.

 

[Montag451]

That was my theory! But it was a parody. because a load of explosives would have been stuck on the outside of the building and, errr......, that would be very silly.

But super mighty nano thermighty is actually very small hence the nano. But it can also be made invisible by using transparent iron oxide

 

[MRC_Hans]

The engine was planted in one of the WTC towers and was made to shoot out like a cannonball by explosives.

Rule #3 for conspiracy theorists: Any theory, no matter how superfluously complicated, can always be embellished by some further complication.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Wow!

Are you intentionally looking for a Stundie nomination or do these things just....emerge...from your psyche?


Fitz

I really think it emerged from another part of his personality. .. Although in this case, they might be identical.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

ETA: I did a quick check and the north tower hole is much larger than 126 feet as it says in the article. Sorry for not checking before posting that. It's more like the hole is too wide for a 767! But it can have to do with the impact angle.

ETA2: I did a more thorough check, and the wingspan of the hole fits very well with the 159 feet for a Boeing 767-200. So, no, those who planned the event knew exactly what type of plane it was made to look like.

Good job of checking the facts and retracting previously posted crap. Keep up the good work, and you may end up making sense!

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Window cleaners working on the outside of the building. If such a team mounted explosives that way, then that could have created the shapes of planes in the facades.

How come nobody noticed the explosions?

Hushaboom invisible charges?

Hans

 

[drewid]

How come nobody noticed the explosions?

Hushaboom invisible charges?

Hans

That must be because they managed to fly a fully loaded jetliner into the explosives just as they were going off, thus hiding the explosion.

 

[Clayton Moore]

Truthers who promote the no plane theory are either disinfo agents trying to discredit the truth movement, or morons. Here's a video that shows some of them at work. Start watching at the 7:20 time mark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A

If the link doesn't work, do a YouTube search on "provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents".

9/11 was an inside job but planes did hit the towers.

So where did all the information come from that enabled foreign intelligence agencies to warn the US that a terrorist attack was imminent?
The plane scenario was seeded into the "plot."

As I said before if explosives brought down the buildings then there could be no room for error. AND the "planes" couldn't be depended upon to hit the towers.

As in how could you plant explosives to take down both towers with possibility of a loose canon military pilot intercepting flight 11 or 175?

Many of the 9/11 quirks validate the no plane scenario.

The pilots who couldn't fly a small plan.
Entering the 4 cockpits without the pilot's doing a mayday.
The Pentagon "plane's" outrageously difficult maneuvers.
The missing black boxes.
No meaningful military response.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/anomalies.html

 

[grandmastershek]

The pilots who couldn't land a small plane safely.
Entering the 4 10' long cockpits without the pilot's doing a mayday within a few seconds.
The Pentagon "plane's" outrageously dangerous maneuvers.
Some of the missing black boxes.
No instantaneous military response.

Corrected for conflicts with reality.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Clayton, they were qualified pilots.

What is a 'loose canon' Military pilot?

 

[Dcdrac]

Clayton the inteeligence services of the rest of the world you know outside the USA, we exist you know the rest of the planet, had indications of a possible terrorist attack on the USA but no details of where or what form it would take.

 

[MRC_Hans]

As I said before if explosives brought down the buildings then there could be no room for error.

But since no explosives existed, this is sort of irrelevant. IF explosives existed, why use planes?

AND the "planes" couldn't be depended upon to hit the towers.

AND that was not necessary for the terrorists. Once they were in control of the planes, some degree of success was certain.

As in how could you plant explosives to take down both towers with possibility of a loose canon military pilot intercepting flight 11 or 175?

If the towers were to be brought down with explosives, there would be no need of planes, fake or not.

Many of the 9/11 quirks validate the no plane scenario.

Even if so, the many physical evidences of the planes effectively invalidate it.

The pilots who couldn't fly a small plan.

They could. They were certified pilots.

Entering the 4 cockpits without the pilot's doing a mayday.

No, because the pre 911 SOP called for cooperating with hijackers, to save lives.

The Pentagon "plane's" outrageously difficult maneuvers.

They were not difficult. Any pilot could perform them.

The missing black boxes.

Two of the black boxes were found. More than enough to prove planes were involved, all in itself.

No meaningful military response.

The pre 911 SOP did not call for affirmative military actions against hijacked planes, to avoid unnecessary loss of life.


Hans

 

[fess]

So where did all the information come from that enabled foreign intelligence agencies to warn the US that a terrorist attack was imminent?
The plane scenario was seeded into the "plot."

As I said before if explosives brought down the buildings then there could be no room for error. AND the "planes" couldn't be depended upon to hit the towers.

As in how could you plant explosives to take down both towers with possibility of a loose canon military pilot intercepting flight 11 or 175?

Many of the 9/11 quirks validate the no plane scenario.

The pilots who couldn't fly a small plan.
Entering the 4 cockpits without the pilot's doing a mayday.
The Pentagon "plane's" outrageously difficult maneuvers.
The missing black boxes.
No meaningful military response.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/anomalies.html

After eleven years, the dumb get dumber.

 

[Anders Lindman]

How come nobody noticed the explosions?

Hushaboom invisible charges?

Hans

You mean the explosives mounted on the facade? That could have easily been camouflaged. As for the explosion, I have posted a video earlier in this thread which shows the explosion without a plane.

 

[fitzgibbon]

As for the explosion, I have posted a video earlier in this thread which shows the explosion without a plane.

Which is a jump-cut of a static shot of the building. The actual full video shows the plane entering frame and colliding with the WTC. D'ohicans who fancy themselves viz-wizzes wouldn't have the forethought or moxy to try to mess with a shot in motion; that would take skill.

Fitz

 

[twinstead]

Jesus, Anders is right! Every still photograph I see of the explosion after the plane entered the building doesn't show a plane! Inside job!!!1111!!1!!111