Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

Mikeys said:
Are you drunk?
anyone now scared by masonic pyramids with a room for practical purposes. you build they pull.
Click to expand...

Projecting much?

Yes, pyramids are very useful for pactical purposes, that's why we keep building them, but since you mention it, the largest masonic pyramid ever built is 79 meters tall, which is roughly equivalent to a 20 story building.

Sooo..... :rolleyes:

Hans
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
No, not lazy. I hoped for some unknown to me evidence of the plane, and not the video that have been proved to be badly CGIed. That's why Glen was so reluctant to point me to the link.
Click to expand...

Oh goody! A no-planer troll claiming CGI! Haven't seen one of those in a while. OK, what element(s) of the video broadcast that day were CGI and which were real-time?

And for extra points, what software do you think was used? Go ahead. Go for specifics. I've worked in broadcast television since the '80s so I'm quite familiar with what gear was being used when and by whom

Fitz
 
Mikeys said:
Does it also tell you contents in the video are not faked? Do you back up the contents in the video? No CGI manipulation before going to media outlets ?
Click to expand...

Care to elucidate on what precisely was being 'manipulated'. Just tossing-off the magic letters "C", "G" and "I" is meaningless. If you don't understand the process, don't be ashamed of 'fessing up your ignorance. The workaday specifics aren't something most people give a flying frack about so it'd be understandable you not knowing the real-world work processes involved

Fitz
 
Corsair 115 said:
Really? It's been proved? By who?
Click to expand...

What? Where you been? You never heard of that television technical genius Ace "I have a Wikipedia entry....oh...wait a second...I don't anymore" Baker?

Whaddareya? On drugs? :D

Corsair 115 said:
If you haven't got such documentary evidence, you haven't got proof the videos are fake.
Click to expand...

He has better; he has low-resolution, multiple-code/decode-pass YouTube videos. He doan need no steenkeeng cheques. Paper trail is so passé!
 
I think the jet engine found near Ground Zero could be of the wrong type. I did some research about that, but couldn't find any definite answer. The curved nozzles on the engine found may be of an older type than was used in Boeing 767s at the time.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think the jet engine found near Ground Zero could be of the wrong type. I did some research about that, but couldn't find any definite answer. The curved nozzles on the engine found may be of an older type than was used in Boeing 767s at the time.
Click to expand...

That's nice. Of course, you'll do some actual investigation and ascertain (with verifiable links/references) the actual answer rather than tossing out another non-point?

Many TIA
Fitz
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think the jet engine found near Ground Zero could be of the wrong type. I did some research about that, but couldn't find any definite answer. The curved nozzles on the engine found may be of an older type than was used in Boeing 767s at the time.
Click to expand...

Not only did they run the risk of hundreds of people spotting them tipping an engine in the street but they went and used the wrong engine! Bah, you just can't hire decent conspirators these days :rolleyes:
 
fitzgibbon said:
That's nice. Of course, you'll do some actual investigation and ascertain (with verifiable links/references) the actual answer rather than tossing out another non-point?

Many TIA
Fitz
Click to expand...

I looked into it at some depth. The part where the nozzles were had indeed been replaced by a new design. The problem is that I couldn't find how the new design looks like. A website for spare parts had an image of the new part but there were no nozzles at all on that part. :confused: So I wonder if it really was the complete part or only a part of the part so to speak.
 
GlennB said:
Not only did they run the risk of hundreds of people spotting them tipping an engine in the street but they went and used the wrong engine! Bah, you just can't hire decent conspirators these days :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The engine was planted in one of the WTC towers and was made to shoot out like a cannonball by explosives.
 
fitzgibbon said:
Wow! :eek:

Are you intentionally looking for a Stundie nomination or do these things just....emerge...from your psyche?


Fitz
Click to expand...

But is it possible? Think David Copperfield. Don't you think he does some spectacular stunts to fool the audience?
 
Hey! I came to think of an interesting conspiracy theory. Maybe those who planned the 9/11 attacks (the shadow cabal) didn't know what kind of planes the government would use as an excuse, because that was a part of the coverup and not something they needed to bother with too much. That would explain why the impact holes in the WTC towers were too small:

"Turning back to reality again, another physical problem for the official WTC theory is that the maximum spread across the north tower hole is 126 feet and the south tower spread is only 103 feet, openings insufficient to accommodate a 767 wingspan of 156 feet. And wings with momentum do not “fold back onto themselves” in order to slip through an undersized hole along with the fuselage. Momentum breaks wings off in a forward motion and they torque inward (pdf) during deceleration but there is no evidence that this happened." -- http://www.911hoax.com/morgan_reynolds_911_hoax.html

ETA: I did a quick check and the north tower hole is much larger than 126 feet as it says in the article. Sorry for not checking before posting that. It's more like the hole is too wide for a 767! But it can have to do with the impact angle.

ETA2: I did a more thorough check, and the wingspan of the hole fits very well with the 159 feet for a Boeing 767-200. So, no, those who planned the event knew exactly what type of plane it was made to look like.
 
Last edited:
The engines planted by someone? how the hell did they get them there with no one noticing??

You do know how big aero engines are don't you?

Not exactly the same size as a two stroke motor mower engine....
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
The engine was planted in one of the WTC towers and was made to shoot out like a cannonball by explosives.
Click to expand...

So, if no plane hit the towers and explosives were used to create the fireball and to propel planted plane parts down to the streets..............how did the explosives cause the columns to bend IN to the buildings at the "supposed" impact points? If you look at close up pictures of the impact points, you will see the columns bowing IN.
 
Dcdrac, you are making the mistake that AL genuinely believes his claims. He is a lazy, dishonest troll who simply says any stupid thing that will get him attention from the grown-ups. It doesn't matter how absurd and offensive it is; or in a sense it does - the vile fantasy that real people weren't murdered that day is attractive to trolls because it provokes people into giving them attention. Trolls don't care about anything but that. Don't indulge the liar; don't feed the troll.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom