• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Should Corporate Profits be Banned?

As much as I would like to have a good laugh at the left over this... I don't really like these gotcha type videos. Stick a camera in someones face and you'll get enough stupid responses. Most of the people who answered the question, probably didn't agree with what they said anyway.... off the cuff answer... didn't really have time to think about it. Also, I'm sure they would have been in favor of better options, like how to appropriately tax and regulate large corporate profits.
 
Get Ready for the first '5 Year Plan'. Of course democrats are smarter than commies so this time that'll work.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/jeffcarter/2012/09/09/america_2016

what I find interesting is Obama’s projected end game. Obama loves big government programs. Every proposal he has made is a giant government program. Big government programs consolidate industries into big dominant players. Oligopolies, and even Monopolies that have huge power over the market. Big government programs use regulation to eliminate competition-so the big corporate fat cats have nothing to fear-except big government.

The movie says that Obama is trying to blow up the deficit intentionally. If we can make things dire enough, the government can take drastic measures to try and remedy things. If major industries are consolidated enough, it’s pretty easy to issue an executive order and take them over. We already know the Democrats would fall behind a Democratic leader and take corporate profits.

Why wouldn’t they support a Democratic leader from taking over the companies that run them? Much easier to do if they are highly consolidated. Company executives might even be stupid enough to go for it if crony capitalism was involved.

It’s an interesting movie to think about. It’s interesting not just because of Obama, but it forces you to think about colonialism, corporate colonialism, and past empires. Very thought provoking.
 
Get Ready for the first '5 Year Plan'. Of course democrats are smarter than commies so this time that'll work.


Hmmm, does Obama getting elected to a second term also mean he gets appointed emperor? Because last time I checked a president has to deal with Congress.
 
That's bad even for a gotcha video. It is just the guy giving rants and catching people saying "sure".

The Daily Show did a proper job.
 
No, he is sending the black Panthers to collect the gold.

And your guns.
 
Hmmm, does Obama getting elected to a second term also mean he gets appointed emperor? Because last time I checked a president has to deal with Congress.
His use so far of executive orders seems to bypass congress quite easily; nor do congress or judiciary have a military.
 
I liked this video taken at the Occupy Charlotte camp. In fairness, these aren't the Democrats per se, but it's still pretty damned funny. Especially the bit with the iPad at the end, went right over that guy's head.
 
P.S. Obummer is coming for your gold coins so he can take "God" off of them! Romney said so!
This would be funny if it didn't have such a big hunk of truth.

I like using gold dollar coins, so I buy them by the roll at the bank. Most people llike them. I tried to use one at a garage sale where this bullet-headed home-owner (ex-marine, as it turned out) refused to take it because "Obama had taken the 'In God We Trust' off of it. I tried not to laugh at him as I showed him that the IGWT was written around the edge of the coin instead of on the face. I didn't mention that they had been that way since they had started being minted, long before Obama was president. He went sorta blank, then stern and asked me if I had any paper money instead. Those Marines are tough.
 
1) For starters, we have here an edited video. We have no idea how many people who said, no, corporations should be allowed to make profits.

2) In spite of that, a number of those Schiff interviewed only said they wanted caps on excessive profits.

3) Sometimes, when looking into the validity of "gotcha" videos, such as this one, it's a good idea to look into the motivation and politics of the interviewer. While such an appproach could degenerate into an ad hominem attack, we would want to take into account in a video on, for example, an environmental issue the fact that it had been produced by an organization such as Greenpeace. Here's are two excerpts from the Wikipedia article on Schiff (hiliites added):

Schiff was an economic adviser to Ron Paul's unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign. In support of Paul's economic revitalization plan, Schiff said: "We need a plan that stimulates savings and production, not more of the reckless borrowing and consumption that got us into this mess in the first place. Ron Paul's plan is the only one that amounts to a step in the right direction. If you want meaningful change—for the better that is—Ron Paul is the only candidate capable of delivering it."
Schiff supports the reduction of government economic regulation, and is concerned that President Obama's administration may increase such regulation.[42] Schiff says that the economic crisis of the late-2000s provides an opportunity to transition from borrowing and spending, to saving and producing. He is critical of the U.S. government's efforts to "ease the pain" with economic stimulus packages and bailouts. According to Schiff, the U.S. government's approach of replacing "legitimate savings with a printing press" could result in hyperinflation.

4) Finally, let me ask you, Robert Prey: Do you believe in the profit motive as the main motivating factor in our economic system, and do you feel it is also what motivates, or should motivate, employees?
 
Last edited:
According to Schiff, the U.S. government's approach of replacing "legitimate savings with a printing press" could result in hyperinflation.

Of course Peter Schiff rants and raves against the U.S. government -- they're the one that put Daddy Schiff the tax denier guru away for tax evasion. Between those two, I'm not sure which one I'd rather pick as my economic advisor.
 
1) For starters, we have here an edited video. We have no idea how many people who said, no, corporations should be allowed to make profits.

True. We don't know how representative those views are. But we do know that he still found a lot of people who would say really stupid things.

2) In spite of that, a number of those Schiff interviewed only said they wanted caps on excessive profits.

First, I corrected that for your statement. Second, while perhaps not as stupid as prohibiting profits, it's still bloody stupid.

3) Sometimes, when looking into the validity of "gotcha" videos, such as this one, it's a good idea to look into the motivation and politics of the interviewer.

Oh, I think that's sufficiently transparent without having to do research: he wants to paint Democrats as radical anti-capitalists. But regardless of his motives, he still succeeded in finding a lot of people who openly express pretty radical opinions on the economy. Whatever the uncertainty about how significant a sign that is (for the reasons you gave in 1)), it's still a bad sign.

4) Finally, let me ask you, Robert Prey: Do you believe in the profit motive as the main motivating factor in our economic system, and do you feel it is also what motivates, or should motivate, employees?

I don't know about Robert Prey, but I think it is. Why do you ask? Do you think it isn't? Do you think it's even possible that it could be otherwise?
 
Odd, for some reason I had the notion that we already had Oligopolies in most industry sectors and that that was the "natural" result of companies buying their smaller rivals while keeping a stable price with the bigger competitors...
Okay, it's a government plot then? Man, I hate that...
 

Back
Top Bottom