Qaeda al Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack in Bulgaria. This was dismissed in Israeli press as a sunni organization is a bit harder to blame on Iran. Qaeda al Jihad was also described as a "previously unknown organization", even though it is the original name of Al Qaeda. That proves NOTHING. If you read up on Islamic Jihad Organization, they were pretty much on their way back already if non existent in 1992.
That Islamic Jihad was arguably simply a front for the
Iranian Revolutionary Guards.
It's interesting how both India and Argentina concluded that Iran was involved in attacks on Israeli and Jewish interests.
One by the IRA, one by Palestinian terrorists. Unrelated.
Eh? While the IRA was still conducting a mainland boming campaign
the two strikes I was referring to were carried out by Palestinian terrorists sponsored by Iran.
Well duh, they are not related events in any way.
The attacks don't need to be 'related' in order to make the simple point that there was a demonstrable spate of attacks on Israeli and Jewish targets in 1994 during which the 1994 Buenos Aires bombing took place. The fact that there was a spate of attacks means that your claim of July 18 being significant as the publication date of Mein Kampf is extremely flawed, and very very
very poor evidence to dispute the conclusions of the Argentinians, who fingered Iran.
No such track record of Middle Eastern terrorist groups of doing it in Latin America or Eastern Europe.
Both of which are irrelevant to the point that neo-Nazis don't blow themselves up, whereas Islamic terrorists do
Not a single shred of evidence has been presented to support that assertion.
Er... really? The fact that there's CCTV footage of a a man lingering around the terminal isn't evidence?
This is the main path investigators are taking because Netanyahu is yapping about it. Maybe a different reason for why their investigation is bloody stuck and no perpetrator is known.
Why do you personalise the issue? There seems to be a strong institutional consensus in Israel and you have to finger Netanyahu alone.
And you know, there are a zillion reasons why an investigation can get stuck. The undeniable fact is that this was an attack by Islamic terrorists on a soft Israeli target.
It only rules it out if a suicide bombing is proven. No such conclusive proof exists. The timing comes at the anniversary of Mein Kampf and tension about Iran's nuclear facilities have been ongoing for YEARS.
Yet Iran has struck already at Israeli interests in India earlier this year alone, and the assassination of scientists is a recent development. Whether or not it is Iran in direct or proxy form, the attack is freaking obviously related to the Middle Eastern conflict. You pointed out above that an Al Qaeda franchise has claimed responsibility. Maybe it was.
Blaming neo-Nazis makes zero sense in this context. You said, "like there aren't enough antisemites in Eastern Europe as it is". Really? There's a history of bomb attacks in Eastern Europe against Israeli targets? This would in fact be virtually the first neo-Nazi attack against an Israeli target in the whole of Europe. Hitherto, neo-Nazi terrorists have traditionally bombed synagogues.
I think you'll find that there are very few Jews in Bulgaria, and the country is quasi-proud of the fact that they resisted handing over Bulgarian citizens to the Nazis for the Final Solution. All the other neo-Nazi movements in Europe are marked out by their extreme nationalism and parochialism. It's really only in Hollywood that you ever get
international right wing terrorism.
Therefore, your throwaway claim is
implausible. You're really going to need better evidence than the coincidence of date.
I did not make any allegation of false flag event. I am making allegations of Reichstag burning. Someone blew that thing up alright, maybe islamic terrorists after all (no way to know for sure that quickly) or neo nazis, but Netanyahu is a bloodsucker using that event for his own political agenda.
And once again you personalise the issue, using blatantly antisemitic language, calling Netanyahu a 'bloodsucker'.
The Israeli state has a good reason to suspect and accuse Iran given that Iran
has already attacked Israeli interests in 2012. Maybe they are too quick to accuse Iran, but that won't make any difference to the overall strategic balance which may or may not result in a military attack on Iran, or another conflict in Lebanon with Hezbollah.
Why not both alright?
All three I'd say. You clearly have an axe to grind about Israel and Jews. That is massively distorting your understanding of world affairs, and leading you to apologise for Islamic terrorism, something you're busy doing on at least three threads right now.
