JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
jargon buster said:
I cant find the resumes of the 40 plus medical witnesses Robert, where are they?
Click to expand...

Resumes? No. Statements including sworn statements. Here's another:

MALCOLM PERRY, MD: In a note written at Parkland Hospital and dated, 11-22-63 Dr., Perry described the head wound as, "A large wound of the right posterior cranium..." (WC--V17:6--CE#392) Describing Kennedy's appearance to the Warren Commission's Arlen Specter Dr. Perry stated, "Yes, there was a large avulsive wound on the right posterior cranium...." (WC- V3:368) Later to Specter: "...I noted a large avulsive wound of the right parietal occipital area, in which both scalp and portions of skull were absent, and there was severe laceration of underlying brain tissue..." (WC--V3:372) In an interview with the HSCA's Andy Purdy in 1-11-78 Mr. Purdy reported that "Dr. Perry... believed the head wound was located on the "occipital parietal" (sic) region of the skull and that the right posterior aspect of the skull was missing..." (HSCA- V7:292-293) Perry told Mr. Purdy: "I looked at the head wound briefly by leaning over the table and noticed that the parietal occipital head wound was largely avulsive and there was visible brain tissue in the macard and some cerebellum seen..." (HSCA-V7:302-interview with Purdy 1-11-78.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
Resumes? No. Statements including sworn statements. Here's another:

MALCOLM PERRY, MD: In a note written at Parkland Hospital and dated, 11-22-63 Dr., Perry described the head wound as, "A large wound of the right posterior cranium..." (WC--V17:6--CE#392) Describing Kennedy's appearance to the Warren Commission's Arlen Specter Dr. Perry stated, "Yes, there was a large avulsive wound on the right posterior cranium...." (WC- V3:368) Later to Specter: "...I noted a large avulsive wound of the right parietal occipital area, in which both scalp and portions of skull were absent, and there was severe laceration of underlying brain tissue..." (WC--V3:372) In an interview with the HSCA's Andy Purdy in 1-11-78 Mr. Purdy reported that "Dr. Perry... believed the head wound was located on the "occipital parietal" (sic) region of the skull and that the right posterior aspect of the skull was missing..." (HSCA- V7:292-293) Perry told Mr. Purdy: "I looked at the head wound briefly by leaning over the table and noticed that the parietal occipital head wound was largely avulsive and there was visible brain tissue in the macard and some cerebellum seen..." (HSCA-V7:302-interview with Purdy 1-11-78.
Click to expand...

So your witness is not infact Perry, but Andy Purdy recounting his story about what he was told? Oh and some descriptions that describe the entry wound to the back of the head as described by the autopsy and seen in the autopsy photos.

Impressive.
 
As once again Robert is hoping that a wound others might call large is the same as his idea of large. An entry wound left by a bullet is rather larger than any hole I would want in my head...
 
Robert Prey said:
The subject is not the Moon, but the Oswald B/Yphotos.
Click to expand...

The subject is your claim that Jack White's analysis of the backyard photos has been favorably peer reviewed. You have no evidence of any such review. You have two people who never mention White, and one amateur like White who defends him.
 
Robert Prey said:
The commonly accepted theory is Conspiracy -- by 66% to 25%.

A majority of the public believes the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (search) was part of a larger conspiracy, not the act of one individual. In addition, most Americans think there was a cover-up of facts about the 1963 shooting.
On the 40th anniversary of JFK’s assassination, a recent FOX News poll shows most Americans disagree with the government’s conclusions about the killing. The Warren Commission (search) found that Lee Harvey Oswald (search) acted alone when he shot Kennedy, but 66 percent of the public today think the assassination was “part of a larger conspiracy” while only 25 percent think it was the “act of one individual.” These new poll results are similar to previous surveys conducted by Louis Harris and Associates in 1967, 1975 and 1981, when about two-thirds also felt the shooting was part of a larger conspiracy.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102511,00.html
Click to expand...

I asked what you called someone who made statements, had them shown to be wrong and then restated the same disproven arguments to continue the argument.

Not the vague statements of what some Americans believe - without the WHY of belief.
 
Another page, and still no definition or explanation for the term "blow-out" [sic]. Now, I know why, and our little friend knows why. When your claim, properly analyzed, can only dissolve like a spoonful of powder in the ocean's swell, you do everything but answer.

So instead he'll yammer on and on about all matter of unsupported nonsense, demonstrating once again that the conspiracy-minded are their own best debunkers. And possessing only the most fragile of egos.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
K's blood,bone and brains in the driver's compartment??? How do you know that?
Click to expand...

Really???...Do you have SSD (Selective Search Disorder)???

You do know that blood was also found on the back of Agent Greer's jacket. How is that possible if the shot was from the front?

Are you really that intellectually dishonest?
 
LogicallyYours said:
Really???...Do you have SSD (Selective Search Disorder)???

You do know that blood was also found on the back of Agent Greer's jacket. How is that possible if the shot was from the front?

Are you really that intellectually dishonest?
Click to expand...

So I gather that you cannot answer the question as to how you know all about blood, brains and tissue in the Driver's compartment.
 
Robert Prey said:
The commonly accepted theory is Conspiracy -- by 66% to 25%.

A majority of the public believes the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (search) was part of a larger conspiracy, not the act of one individual. In addition, most Americans think there was a cover-up of facts about the 1963 shooting.
On the 40th anniversary of JFK’s assassination, a recent FOX News poll shows most Americans disagree with the government’s conclusions about the killing. The Warren Commission (search) found that Lee Harvey Oswald (search) acted alone when he shot Kennedy, but 66 percent of the public today think the assassination was “part of a larger conspiracy” while only 25 percent think it was the “act of one individual.” These new poll results are similar to previous surveys conducted by Louis Harris and Associates in 1967, 1975 and 1981, when about two-thirds also felt the shooting was part of a larger conspiracy.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102511,00.html
Click to expand...

I'f you post this three times, click your heels together and recite the phrase "40 medical witnesses" three times.


....


You'll still be dead in the water.
 
"40 medical witnesses"
"A whitewash"
"Blow out"

Which reminds me Robert you still haven't provided:
40 medical witnesses
Favourable peer reviews of White in any journal of photo analysis
The words "blow out" in the WC testemony dr Clark signed
Your blood spatter analysis of JFKs shirt

Im not letting you off the hook.
 
Robert Prey said:
So I gather that you cannot answer the question as to how you know all about blood, brains and tissue in the Driver's compartment.
Click to expand...

NOTE: (Blood drops appear on the windshield near the crack in CE 350 11/23/63 WR78. Also, what appears to be blood is visible on the windshield in 7HSCA385 (Figure 5). Chief Rowley of the Secret Service told the Warren Commission that "...the area around the (crack in the windshield) was splattered with debris." (CD80, p. 2)
Click to expand...

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/exploded.htm

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/windshld.jpg
 
JayUtah said:
The subject is your claim that Jack White's analysis of the backyard photos has been favorably peer reviewed. You have no evidence of any such review. You have two people who never mention White, and one amateur like White who defends him.
Click to expand...

Jay Utah's definition of an "amateur" as evidence by Brain Mee's resume"

Depart of Defense (DOD) photographer and photo lab
technician. worked in photography for 18 years,DOD photographer and technician for 10 years, studied and had on-the-job training in negative retouching,print development, shadows, and negative analysis had technical courses in color print development and
color negative development at the Winona School of Photography,
Winona, Wisconsin, which is affiliated with the Professional
Photographers of America School courses in
automatic printing and in using computer video analyzers at the
KODAK School of Photography in Rochester, New York.

Utah's problem is, Mee's background cannot be challenged -- thus Utah is left pooh-poohing his peer review endorsement of Jack White.

Sour Grapes.
 
Robert Prey said:
Blood spray from frontal shot to head via jet spay -- yes. Brains? NO.
Click to expand...

"Blood spray from frontal shot to head via jet spay", Yeah....NO. Not consistent with the photographic evidence which shows the skin flap moving forward and to the right....Also, not consistent with the wind and forward motion of the vehicle.

Regarding brain matter, currently looking for the testimony/image.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom