JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tomtomkent said:
Perhaps you could use you new found expertise on blood spatter analysis to describe exactly how you came to conclusion that stain is indicative of "brains blown out the back of your head"?

Why, for example are the stains not compatible with blood having flown from an entry wound on the back of the head? Or from pooling as JFK leant back? Exactly how did you calculate the volume, flow and splatter of the wound you think you have proven?
Click to expand...

Common sense and corroboration by 40 plus on the scene medical witnesses describing a large blow-out wound in the back of the head.


picture.php
 
Last edited:
Robert, AGAIN....how does a shot from the front, make it possible for blood, bone and brain matter to find its way to the drivers compartment of the limo!
 
thedopefishlives said:
That is a lie and I demand an immediate retraction.
Click to expand...

He has reached the utter end of his argumentation. Not even lunchmeat works anymore. His fringe reset has failed. So now he's retreated into the last delusional corner of the ideological trench: accusing his critics of secretly believing in him.

Yeah, we're done. I know we've been pseudo-done for about a hundred pages. But Robert can't have given us a more eloquent expression of surrender. He's completely stumped, and he knows it. He just said so.
 
Robert Prey said:
Common sense...
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. The disposition of blood following trauma is considered a field of expertise and you are not a relevant expert.

and corroboration by 40 plus on the scene medical witnesses describing a large blow-out wound in the back of the head.
Click to expand...

Disputed; you refuse to substantiate.

Argument rejected -- insufficient expertise and assuming facts not in evidence.
 
Robert Prey said:
Common sense and corroboration by 40 plus on the scene medical witnesses describing a large blow-out wound in the back of the head.


[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=808&pictureid=6378[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Both of which have diddly squat to do with your offering of the shirt as evidence.

I asked what methodology of analysing the blood stains on JFKs shirt convinced you it was consistant with the wound you describe.

You did not answer that question. You once again claimed to have (with out supplying) 40 Medical Witnesses who saw a blow-out wound. As you have yet to supply the 40 citations required to support that claim it is doubly meaningless.

But in your own words I am not letting you off the hook. I want to see your study of the bloodstains that lead to your conclusion they support you claim.
 
Well, while this isn't a peer-review of his work, these are some statements from the site debunking his moon-hoax photo analysis:

White's approach to Apollo photography is especially clumsy. While we are not Kennedy assassination experts, we are Apollo experts, and his assertions regarding the Apollo photographs are frequently absurd. In many cases White demonstrates he doesn't understand what various Apollo equipment is or what it's used for. And in a few cases he has edited and composed the photos in a way that creates "anomalies" that weren't there otherwise.
Click to expand...

Such as?

See the photo analysis page for some specific examples.

For example, White cropped and resized two photos of the same lunar mountain in order to argue that the mountain "changed size" between the two photos, suggesting the same studio backdrop was used in two different occasions. In fact, when the unaltered photos are examined the mountain is proportionally the same size.
Click to expand...
 
Robert Prey said:
Jay Utah, et al. No matter what you all may say; in your heart, you know I'm right.
Click to expand...

Right out of your mind?

Seriously, Bob what would you call someone who, after having his claims soundly proven to be wrong and is completely unable to provide ANY evidence to counter the commonly accepted theory, restates the same arguments and asserts that he is correct?
 
Border Reiver said:
Right out of your mind?

Seriously, Bob what would you call someone who, after having his claims soundly proven to be wrong and is completely unable to provide ANY evidence to counter the commonly accepted theory, restates the same arguments and asserts that he is correct?
Click to expand...

The commonly accepted theory is Conspiracy -- by 66% to 25%.

A majority of the public believes the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (search) was part of a larger conspiracy, not the act of one individual. In addition, most Americans think there was a cover-up of facts about the 1963 shooting.
On the 40th anniversary of JFK’s assassination, a recent FOX News poll shows most Americans disagree with the government’s conclusions about the killing. The Warren Commission (search) found that Lee Harvey Oswald (search) acted alone when he shot Kennedy, but 66 percent of the public today think the assassination was “part of a larger conspiracy” while only 25 percent think it was the “act of one individual.” These new poll results are similar to previous surveys conducted by Louis Harris and Associates in 1967, 1975 and 1981, when about two-thirds also felt the shooting was part of a larger conspiracy.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102511,00.html
 
LogicallyYours said:
Well, while this isn't a peer-review of his work, these are some statements from the site debunking his moon-hoax photo analysis:

Such as?
Click to expand...


Fallacious reasoning. The subject is not the Moon, but the Oswald B/Yphotos. The HSCA panel's conclusions regarding the Backyard photos are equally absurd.
 
Robert Prey said:
The commonly accepted theory is Conspiracy -- by 66% to 25%.

A majority of the public believes the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (search) was part of a larger conspiracy, not the act of one individual. In addition, most Americans think there was a cover-up of facts about the 1963 shooting.
On the 40th anniversary of JFK’s assassination, a recent FOX News poll shows most Americans disagree with the government’s conclusions about the killing. The Warren Commission (search) found that Lee Harvey Oswald (search) acted alone when he shot Kennedy, but 66 percent of the public today think the assassination was “part of a larger conspiracy” while only 25 percent think it was the “act of one individual.” These new poll results are similar to previous surveys conducted by Louis Harris and Associates in 1967, 1975 and 1981, when about two-thirds also felt the shooting was part of a larger conspiracy.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102511,00.html
Click to expand...

Now all we have to do is get this discussion out to the general public and watch support for a JFK assassination CT vanish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom