twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
Congratulations. Great first contribution to the thread.
And I still await yours
Congratulations. Great first contribution to the thread.
It's explicable, all right -- but doing so would get me dinged
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7973150&postcount=1
So where are the mountain fortresses Rumsfeld was yammering about at 6 minutes in?
I see you've neglected to answer any of the excellent questions posed to you recently on this thread. Congratulations.
not answering questions is clayton's forte. He employs this technique in allthreads he posts in.of his
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7973150&postcount=1
So where are the mountain fortresses Rumsfeld was yammering about at 6 minutes in?
That he abandoned his OP when proven wrong.000063 said:He did the same thing in his "Virus CT" topic.
???
Wrong.Al Qaeda is if I remember correctly a name invented by theUS for legal purposes of suing Bin Laden's "organization". If you check any and all videos of Al Zawahiri and Bin Laden, you will find they refer to [Al] Qaeda al Jihad, never as Al Qaeda only. This can also be found back in the (in)famous Letters from Abbottabad. There are rumors that "Al Qaeda" only can be slang in Arabic for "the potty" , but I've not been able to confirm that.
So you evidence for the US inventing the name is an anonymous letter sent to an anonymous person that discusses what al Qaeda wants to call itself?This document is part of a longer letter which was not released to the CTC. It is not clear who authored the letter or to whom it was addressed.
Al Qaeda is if I remember correctly a name invented by the US for legal purposes of suing Bin Laden's "organization". If you check any and all videos of Al Zawahiri and Bin Laden, you will find they refer to [Al] Qaeda al Jihad, never as Al Qaeda only. This can also be found back in the (in)famous Letters from Abbottabad. There are rumors that "Al Qaeda" only can be slang in Arabic for "the potty" , but I've not been able to confirm that.
That particular name is very old. It was born without any intention from us. Brother Abu Ubaida (rahimahullah) al-Banshiri (Panjshiri) [6] created a military base to train the young men to fight against the vicious, arrogant, brutal, terrorizing soviet empire, which was a truth to all observers [al-baghi, al-ghaashim, al-mulhid, al-irhaabi haqiqatan lil mu'aamilin]. So this place was called "The Base" ["Al-Qai`dah"],
Hey guys, I just wandered into the CT subfora out of abject boredom . . . and great suff'rin' Christ on a cracker, how do you people stand it? These guys are worse than the Young Earth Creationists.
You gotta love the anti Christian slurs. Christians seem to be the only fair game at JREF.
Why? Because you say so? Give me a reference. I think I could give you one for MY assertion, probably it is in the 9/11 commission report but I would have to look into that.Wrong.
Strawman. Plus using an excerpt only of what I said. I also said you can check all videos of Bin Laden and Zawahiri. Not ONCE do they refer to themselves as Al Qaeda, but ALWAYS as Qaeda Al Jihad, without being clear whether this is the name of an organization of some sorts or the abstract concept of the "base of the jihad".So you evidence for the US inventing the name is an anonymous letter sent to an anonymous person that discusses what al Qaeda wants to call itself?
That interview was never aired on Al Jazeera to my knowledge, but an unverifiable transcript was first released by CNN in 2001 or 2002. I am surprised to see it now available on YouTube, it seems to have been first released in 2011 for some reason? Tayseer Allouni also spent some years in a Spanish jail, probably for the sole reason of having interviewed Bin Laden. He was released only this year. From the transcript I have of that interview:Here's Bin Laden explaining the origin of the name 'Al Qaeda' in an interview with Al Jazeera journalist Tayseer Allouni:
Interesting.One of Bin Laden's mentors from the Afghan Jihad, Abdullah Azzam, wrote an article for 'Jihad' magazine in 1988 titled 'Al Qaeda al Sulbah' (the solid base). Azzam's idea was for a solid core of activists and fighters to act as a vanguard for the establishment of Islamic states throughout the muslim world. Azzam's ideas inspired Bin Laden, it's possible that the name of Bin Laden's own organisation came from this reference and Bin Laden's later explanation in the Al-Jazeera interview is an attempt to portray the organisation as his idea alone. Bin Laden's organisation was conceived more as a kind of 'international brigade' of trained fighters that would assist the overthrow of 'un-islamic' rulers.
I have my issues with Bergen as a source of anything on Bin Laden.Documentary mention of Al Qaeda as an actual organisation occur in the minutes of a meeting held at Bin Laden's house in August 1988, 4 months after the article by Azzam. The document can be found in Peter Bergen's book 'The Osama Bin Laden I know,'
I have my issues with Bergen as a source of anything on Bin Laden.
I haven't seen it, so no. If it is in English, I would object it is possible translation is off. I've seen movies of Al Zawahiri where he clearly speaks of Qaeda al Jihad being put as Al Qaeda in transcript.And do you have any issues with the document containing the minutes of the AQ meeting? If so, why?
I haven't seen it, so no. If it is in English, I would object it is possible translation is off. I've seen movies of Al Zawahiri where he clearly speaks of Qaeda al Jihad being put as Al Qaeda in transcript.
I haven't read his book, so I don't know what it claims exactly.So you accept that a group of people met at Bin Laden's house in 1988 to discuss founding a group born out of dissatisfaction with MAK?
What does Bin Laden himself say again?We can argue about what to call the organisation, or the various ways the term 'Al Qaeda' has been included in terminology throughout that organisation at various times, but you're not doubting the organisation actually existed?
What does Bin Laden himself say again?