Straw Man
Flammable
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2012
- Messages
- 8,184
I am not in any way engaged in a vicious or inane attack on Straw Man’s narrative. Don’t forget Straw came to us with his story and I don’t think there is anything wrong in reviewing it or asking him to expand upon parts of it.
It's a handy-dandy way to ignore other pressing questions, Mr Traynor.
Charles Traynor said:What we have learned thus far from Straw’s account of the liberation of Belsen:
His uncle was an Infantryman.
A few bad apples from the 8th battalion the Rifle Brigade regiment have brought the name of this fine old regiment into disrepute by shooting POWS in the legs and hips for fun.
Did I say they were prisoners of war. These were Waffen-SS troops, and they were armed and fighting back. Where they wanted to deliver their lead was their concern. No mention of unarmed.
Charles Traynor said:There is now a general consensus amongst JREF members that the British Royal Engineers were using the D4 model of bulldozer at Belsen.
We are still engaged in discussion as to why Infantrymen would have been asked to operate and/or ride on the outside of the one man operated RE bulldozers.
Why? I'm sure there are manifold reasons. How exactly does it fit into your revisionist thinking?
When are you going to address questions asked of you from other posters?