NASA's official position on the Chinese spacewalk is that it was real. If it was obviously faked, shouldn't we wonder about NASA?
Truly pathetic circular reasoning. The spacewalk was not faked. The flag spinning unrestricted in a vacuum is not even close to being possible AT ANY SPEED in water.
Also, the Chinese spacewalk makes a good objectivity test. The proof that it was faked is so clear that anyone who tries to obfuscate it or refuses to address the issue is obviously less-than-objective and therefore unfit to analyze the Apollo footage and pictures. That pretty much covers all of the pro-Apollo posters here.
More idiotic circular reasoning, especially in view of your "analysis" of why the guy who made the video is pro-Apollo - "he was got at"
Your response would create guffaws of laughter from the people who decide whether you are eligible to be even let in to the debating hall!
It looks like a bubble to me.
Orly
The viewers can decide for themselves.
They all think it's a piece of space debris, maybe a piece of ice.
It slides along the visor and goes upward at the exact point a bubble would.
Rubbish, it comes towards the camera and doesn't go straight up as a bubble would.
Just because nothing comes up when I goggle "Wave blowers" doesn't mean they're mythical. You haven't proven they don't exist. Check out this video...snipped
Ridiculous I don't need to prove something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist! They don't exist because they aren't even theoretically feasible. Currents in water don't magically stop moving when they find something. Using them as a means to support is just moronic when there is a proven method widely used already.
Negative buoyancy is performed with weights. Using imaginary crap to do something that wouldn't even work is patently absurd.
Anyway, there is some super-clear proof such as the buoyant safety cables. It's such clear proof that you people all refuse to address it.
There is nothing to address. Things in freefall are subject to a freedom not afforded with gravity. The cable goes in all sorts of directions and you obviously "don't believe your own argument"
TM
Some of the footage was sped-up. The movement you say is not consistent with movemet is water would look consistent if slowed-down.
Rubbish. Some of us check things like that out. You make all these claims, yet never put video up to demonstrate it. You are lying.
My not having access to classified info doesn't mean it couldn't have happened. The government can manipulate any data it wants to so any records saying such-and-such a thing happened cannot be used as proof of anything.
Ebil gubmint and magic all encompassing pwoof noted.
You have an authoritative patronizing attitude but what you're actually saying is pretty lame.
You demonstrate why conspiracy theorists are regarded as complete nutjobs with your inability to see anything that contradicts you.
As bubbles get closer to the camera, the look bigger. They also grow in size as water pressure decreases.
They would grow in size very little over the course of such a movement. The fact the object is coming towards the camera is more than proof enough that it isn't in water. Let alone the flag spinning
without the water flapping it about and rippling it and totally unrestricted.
Let's hear your analysis of the buoyant safety cables.
Shape memory is a good explanation, having a buoyant steel cable in water in the first place is a truly pathetic claim. Not one single website, scientific article or actual working model supports this stupid wave-blowers idea. Do you know why?
Because he made it up to explain things that made no sense in water. The flag though, closes the case. There are some thing so clear that even the worst sophist(you) and the worst obuscator(you) cannot hide.
Anyway there are a million reasons to support Apollo landing on the Moon, and not one single piece of evidence, that holds up to scruitiny, that says otherwise.
