If an official government report was introduced as an official government report, judicial notice was taken of said report. If judicial notice is taken of a report, the facts in that report do not need to be proven.
That's the way it works in the real world. That point is moot around here because, according to Team holocaust, none of the evidence introduced at Nuremberg nor any of the facts that the Tribunal wrote in any of the judgements is considered to have been accepted by the Tribunal as true unless it can be shown specifically how that specific fact influenced a specific defendant's sentence. For example, the judgement states that 2.5 million people were exterminated at Auschwitz and another half a million died from other causes. Although that is stated in the judgement, it doesn't mean that this fact was ever accepted as true by the tribunal because that specific fact cannot be directly linked to any specific defendant's sentence.
Essentially, the Nuremberg Trials have no evidentiary value whatsoever. It sounds crazy but that's the way they think.
