• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Holocaust Denial Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can stick your simplification up your ass. Historical reality is always more complex. There are multiple relationships between the Holocaust and WWII on many levels. We have even discussed some of them in recent weeks. Some examples:

1. The course of the war influenced the timing and pace of the mass murder of Jews, and later on slowed it down because the need for labour in 1944 outweighed the ideological goal of killing Jews.

2. The same units and personnel who killed Jews also killed non-Jews. The same techniques were used to kill both Jews and non-Jews.

3. In many countries occupied by the Nazis (Italy, Greece, Yugoslavia to name but a few), more non-Jews than Jews died - those are absolute numbers.

4. Jews fought in the various campaigns on the Allied side, and some were killed in action or taken prisoner. The killed in action (like the 32,000 Polish Jews killed in 1939, or the 140,000 Soviet Jewish soldiers killed from 1941-45) are not Holocaust victims; Polish and Soviet prisoners of war were treated as Jews and subjected to the Holocaust so are Holocaust victims. As most occupied countries (in western Europe or the Balkans) were overrun quickly, the number of combat deaths was fairly small in comparison to the total population and thus, to the total Jewish population, and is thus irrelevant.

5. Ditto with civilian deaths from collateral damage. The 1939-41 campaigns were relatively brief, and while they killed many civilians, the numbers were proportionately small. Some evidence exists that during the siege of Warsaw, German artillery fire was directed deliberately onto the Jewish districts, but the total loss of life among Jews from collateral damage in the 1939 campaign is not ascribed to the Holocaust.

6. The Nazis had an almost unerring habit of deporting Jews en masse long before the war returned to the relevant countries or regions. By the time that there was a battle of Kharkov in 1943, the Jews of Kharkov had all been machine-gunned into Drobitskii Yar. By the time that there was a battle of Warsaw in 1944, the Jews of Warsaw had all been deported; the thousands in hiding became part of the total civilian casualites of the Warsaw Uprising of 1944, the catch being that it's evident that some were killed as Jews when their hiding places were uncovered.

7. Bombing wasn't very effective until well into the war and inflicted relatively few casualties in 1940-42. The Nazis deported the Jews from their cities almost entirely by the end of 1942, in some cases immediately prior to bombing raids whose timing they could not possibly know. The Jewish armaments workers of Berlin were deported at the start of 1943, whereas the prolonged 'Battle of Berlin' was at the end of 1943. Allied air raids on cities like Belgrade took place long after there were no more Jews in Belgrade.

8. The Germans however perceived a connection, albeit delusory, between air raids and Jews, and actually wrote quite a lot to the Nazi authorities suggesting that Jews be held near to threatened cities as hostages in order to stop the Allies bombing the cities. When the Allies bombed Budapest in mid-1944, this was one of a number of factors leading Admiral Horthy to call a halt to the deportations of Hungarian Jews.

9. Many Jews in France were rounded up after 'Barbarossa' as so-called 'communists' and then treated as hostages when the PCF organised resistance, some being shot while others were then deported to Auschwitz as a substitute for increasing reprisal shootings. The choice of Jews as hostages was deliberate and racist, making them Holocaust victims.

10. In Yugoslavia, native resistance led the Nazis to decide to shoot Austrian Jewish refugees interned by the Yugoslav government in a refugee camp at Sabac as 'hostages', a reprisal which targeted entirely the wrong population since Austrian Jewish refugees were not even vaguely part of Tito's popular front resistance movement, and probably couldn't even communicate with Serbian and Croatian partisans for obvious linguistic reasons.

11. From the get-go in Poland, Polish Jews were executed in so-called reprisals without any evidence that they had resisted or helped resistance; they were killed as Jews, because they were Jews, and because the Nazis enjoyed tormenting and killing Jews. From the get-go, the Nazis instituted an antisemitic policy of exclusion and control, meaning that many punishments were exacted on Jews because they fell foul of petty by-laws and regulations applied exclusively to Jews, or which were a direct product of antisemitic ordinances. Executing smugglers caught leaving a ghetto isn't executing smugglers, it's executing people who have been forced into a ghetto because they were Jews.

12. The same consideration means every single ghetto death from starvation is a Holocaust death and not something that can be written off to 'there was a war going on', since the Jews were placed into ghettos deliberately, because they were Jews, and given lower rations, because they were Jews.

13. Likewise in Russia, Nazi units started killing Jews as Jews from the outset, blamed Jews for the resistance acts of other people, and fantasised about a Jewish partisan link that did not exist in 1941. By the time there actually were any Jewish partisans, then the Nazi intention to murder Jews en masse was pretty clear to all concerned, and thus resistance was no longer resistance in its own right, but a matter of survival.

14. Hungarian Jews were conscripted into labour battalions, being deemed unworthy of armed service. Thousands were captured in the destruction of the Hungarian 2nd Army in 1943, and died in Soviet captivity along with Hungarian soldiers. On the other hand, Hungarian Jews in labour battalions were also killed by Hungarian troops as well as Nazi soldiers, because they were Jews.

15. While Jews in the provinces of Hungary were deported en masse not long before the country became a battle-ground, the Jews of Budapest remained in place after Horthy called a halt. By late 1944 the Nazis decided to force march some of them out to Austria to work as slave labourers, but a large ghetto remained, protected to a very limited extent by Raoul Wallenberg and other diplomats. The Hungarian fascists, the Arrow Cross, formed gangs which tormented Jews in the ghetto and also carried out numerous massacres inside the city, which became besieged in 1945. Jews also died because of collateral damage in the siege. The latter are not Holocaust victims in my opinion.

16. Allied bombing in 1944-45 certainly did kill large numbers of foreign workers and concentration camp inmates, thus including Jews, eg a transport of Hungarian Jews being transferred from Auschwitz to Gelsenkirchen in the summer of 1944 was hit by an air raid, killing several hundred; and then there's the sinking of the Cap Arcona, which carried Neuengamme inmates, in 1945, by RAF planes. Numerically, such losses are still insignificant compared to deaths from other causes which can be considered deliberate acts by the Nazis; and they also occurred while the prisoners were in Nazi captivity, making them ultimately the Nazis' responsibility, just as Russian workers dying in Essen died because the Nazis deported them against their will to Essen, not because they chose to labour under Allied bombs.

17. Bottom line is, the Nazis behaved in such a racist and antisemitic fashion from the get-go in all occupied territories that they rapidly escalated to killing Jews qua Jews, reducing the chance that Jews would die for purely war-related reasons. But Jews did die because of war-related reasons. It's not as simple as saying that 5.1-5.3 million Jews died in the Holocaust and the balance died in the war to a total of 6 million. 200-300,000 'war casualties' maybe. Which compared to the population loss of Belgium at 88,000 out of nearly 9 million, is quite high.

17. Any further questions, read and dissect the information found in this Wiki entry, and follow up with reading the relevant entries for the Holocaust in Austria through Yugoslavia.

Nick you forgot there was one nail out of palce at Auchwitz so it could not have happened where did the nail go???
 
More commonly known connections between WWII and the Holocaust:

1. The Nazis physically could not start killing Jews in large numbers until they went to war and occupied multiple European countries

2. The escalation of the Holocaust followed on from the opening of the largest campaign of the war, Operation 'Barbarossa'

3. The extension of the Europe-wide Final Solution was conditioned by the crisis at Moscow and globalisation of the war, leading to the Wannsee compromise

4. Increased deportations of foreign workers acted as a cover and an enabling factor to carry out the FS

5. Nazi occupation policy routinely resorted to 'solving' the 'Jewish question' as a means of 'solving' real or imagined problems, eg food shortages.

6. Euthanasia didn't start until the outbreak of war, and pioneered the technique of mass gassing used against Jews. Euthanasia was justified by a combination of ideological (racist-eugenic) and economic (war-related) excuses.

7. The Nazis blamed "the Jews" for starting the war, in the most spectacular act of projection in human history.

8. Killing Jews became one of many Nazi war aims, and the one positive outcome Hitler could recall in his political testament written just before he blew his brains out.

9. The Nazis killed millions of non-Jews in war crimes ranging from gassing to shooting to hanging to deaths in concentration camps and POW camps. These killings helped accelerate the Holocaust while the Holocaust also accelerated and exacerbated the willingness of the Nazis to kill non-Jews, eg police battalions and Einsatzgruppen carrying out more vicious reprisals and village burnings in Soviet partisan-controlled territory because they'd previously been mowing down Jews.
 
Last edited:
More commonly known connections between WWII and the Holocaust:

1. The Nazis physically could not start killing Jews in large numbers until they went to war and occupied multiple European countries

2. The escalation of the Holocaust followed on from the opening of the largest campaign of the war, Operation 'Barbarossa'

3. The extension of the Europe-wide Final Solution was conditioned by the crisis at Moscow and globalisation of the war, leading to the Wannsee compromise

4. Increased deportations of foreign workers acted as a cover and an enabling factor to carry out the FS

5. Nazi occupation policy routinely resorted to 'solving' the 'Jewish question' as a means of 'solving' real or imagined problems, eg food shortages.

6. Euthanasia didn't start until the outbreak of war, and pioneered the technique of mass gassing used against Jews. Euthanasia was justified by a combination of ideological (racist-eugenic) and economic (war-related) excuses.

7. The Nazis blamed "the Jews" for starting the war, in the most spectacular act of projection in human history.

8. Killing Jews became one of many Nazi war aims, and the one positive outcome Hitler could recall in his political testament written just before he blew his brains out.

9. The Nazis killed millions of non-Jews in war crimes ranging from gassing to shooting to hanging to deaths in concentration camps and POW camps. These killings helped accelerate the Holocaust while the Holocaust also accelerated and exacerbated the willingness of the Nazis to kill non-Jews, eg police battalions and Einsatzgruppen carrying out more vicious reprisals and village burnings in Soviet partisan-controlled territory because they'd previously been mowing down Jews.

Don´t know which number that should go under, but... the Nazis et al also blamed the Jews for causing Germany to lose WW1 somehow, didn´t they? Starting from that demented, but seriously held, premise, killing the Jews would have been sort of a necessary prerequisite for winning the war this time around, wouldn´t it - even leaving aside the motive of revenge.
 
Dogzilla has now tried using a, "load bearing wall" ploy as his latest holocaust-demolition metaphor.

Given Dogzilla's frankly unsuccessful results in removing said "load bearing wall," may I suggest the following?

In place of undermining the more foundationally vital of the essential keystones and footings and fundamental walls holding up the Holocaust hoax, he should crack on and take down that heavy and dangerously crumbling stone lintel above a small window in the back outhouse of the hoax.

.
 
Dogzilla has now tried using a, "load bearing wall" ploy as his latest holocaust-demolition metaphor.

Given Dogzilla's frankly unsuccessful results in removing said "load bearing wall," may I suggest the following?

In place of undermining the more foundationally vital of the essential keystones and footings and fundamental walls holding up the Holocaust hoax, he should crack on and take down that heavy and dangerously crumbling stone lintel above a small window in the back outhouse of the hoax.

I'd say he has as much chance of causing structural damage as as dog does when urinating on an outside wall; the rain washes away the dog piss.
 
You can stick your simplification up your ass. Historical reality is always more complex. There are multiple relationships between the Holocaust and WWII on many levels. We have even discussed some of them in recent weeks. Some examples:

1. The course of the war influenced the timing and pace of the mass murder of Jews, and later on slowed it down because the need for labour in 1944 outweighed the ideological goal of killing Jews.

2. The same units and personnel who killed Jews also killed non-Jews. The same techniques were used to kill both Jews and non-Jews.

3. In many countries occupied by the Nazis (Italy, Greece, Yugoslavia to name but a few), more non-Jews than Jews died - those are absolute numbers.

4. Jews fought in the various campaigns on the Allied side, and some were killed in action or taken prisoner. The killed in action (like the 32,000 Polish Jews killed in 1939, or the 140,000 Soviet Jewish soldiers killed from 1941-45) are not Holocaust victims; Polish and Soviet prisoners of war were treated as Jews and subjected to the Holocaust so are Holocaust victims. As most occupied countries (in western Europe or the Balkans) were overrun quickly, the number of combat deaths was fairly small in comparison to the total population and thus, to the total Jewish population, and is thus irrelevant.

5. Ditto with civilian deaths from collateral damage. The 1939-41 campaigns were relatively brief, and while they killed many civilians, the numbers were proportionately small. Some evidence exists that during the siege of Warsaw, German artillery fire was directed deliberately onto the Jewish districts, but the total loss of life among Jews from collateral damage in the 1939 campaign is not ascribed to the Holocaust.

6. The Nazis had an almost unerring habit of deporting Jews en masse long before the war returned to the relevant countries or regions. By the time that there was a battle of Kharkov in 1943, the Jews of Kharkov had all been machine-gunned into Drobitskii Yar. By the time that there was a battle of Warsaw in 1944, the Jews of Warsaw had all been deported; the thousands in hiding became part of the total civilian casualites of the Warsaw Uprising of 1944, the catch being that it's evident that some were killed as Jews when their hiding places were uncovered.

7. Bombing wasn't very effective until well into the war and inflicted relatively few casualties in 1940-42. The Nazis deported the Jews from their cities almost entirely by the end of 1942, in some cases immediately prior to bombing raids whose timing they could not possibly know. The Jewish armaments workers of Berlin were deported at the start of 1943, whereas the prolonged 'Battle of Berlin' was at the end of 1943. Allied air raids on cities like Belgrade took place long after there were no more Jews in Belgrade.

8. The Germans however perceived a connection, albeit delusory, between air raids and Jews, and actually wrote quite a lot to the Nazi authorities suggesting that Jews be held near to threatened cities as hostages in order to stop the Allies bombing the cities. When the Allies bombed Budapest in mid-1944, this was one of a number of factors leading Admiral Horthy to call a halt to the deportations of Hungarian Jews.

9. Many Jews in France were rounded up after 'Barbarossa' as so-called 'communists' and then treated as hostages when the PCF organised resistance, some being shot while others were then deported to Auschwitz as a substitute for increasing reprisal shootings. The choice of Jews as hostages was deliberate and racist, making them Holocaust victims.

10. In Yugoslavia, native resistance led the Nazis to decide to shoot Austrian Jewish refugees interned by the Yugoslav government in a refugee camp at Sabac as 'hostages', a reprisal which targeted entirely the wrong population since Austrian Jewish refugees were not even vaguely part of Tito's popular front resistance movement, and probably couldn't even communicate with Serbian and Croatian partisans for obvious linguistic reasons.

11. From the get-go in Poland, Polish Jews were executed in so-called reprisals without any evidence that they had resisted or helped resistance; they were killed as Jews, because they were Jews, and because the Nazis enjoyed tormenting and killing Jews. From the get-go, the Nazis instituted an antisemitic policy of exclusion and control, meaning that many punishments were exacted on Jews because they fell foul of petty by-laws and regulations applied exclusively to Jews, or which were a direct product of antisemitic ordinances. Executing smugglers caught leaving a ghetto isn't executing smugglers, it's executing people who have been forced into a ghetto because they were Jews.

12. The same consideration means every single ghetto death from starvation is a Holocaust death and not something that can be written off to 'there was a war going on', since the Jews were placed into ghettos deliberately, because they were Jews, and given lower rations, because they were Jews.

13. Likewise in Russia, Nazi units started killing Jews as Jews from the outset, blamed Jews for the resistance acts of other people, and fantasised about a Jewish partisan link that did not exist in 1941. By the time there actually were any Jewish partisans, then the Nazi intention to murder Jews en masse was pretty clear to all concerned, and thus resistance was no longer resistance in its own right, but a matter of survival.

14. Hungarian Jews were conscripted into labour battalions, being deemed unworthy of armed service. Thousands were captured in the destruction of the Hungarian 2nd Army in 1943, and died in Soviet captivity along with Hungarian soldiers. On the other hand, Hungarian Jews in labour battalions were also killed by Hungarian troops as well as Nazi soldiers, because they were Jews.

15. While Jews in the provinces of Hungary were deported en masse not long before the country became a battle-ground, the Jews of Budapest remained in place after Horthy called a halt. By late 1944 the Nazis decided to force march some of them out to Austria to work as slave labourers, but a large ghetto remained, protected to a very limited extent by Raoul Wallenberg and other diplomats. The Hungarian fascists, the Arrow Cross, formed gangs which tormented Jews in the ghetto and also carried out numerous massacres inside the city, which became besieged in 1945. Jews also died because of collateral damage in the siege. The latter are not Holocaust victims in my opinion.

16. Allied bombing in 1944-45 certainly did kill large numbers of foreign workers and concentration camp inmates, thus including Jews, eg a transport of Hungarian Jews being transferred from Auschwitz to Gelsenkirchen in the summer of 1944 was hit by an air raid, killing several hundred; and then there's the sinking of the Cap Arcona, which carried Neuengamme inmates, in 1945, by RAF planes. Numerically, such losses are still insignificant compared to deaths from other causes which can be considered deliberate acts by the Nazis; and they also occurred while the prisoners were in Nazi captivity, making them ultimately the Nazis' responsibility, just as Russian workers dying in Essen died because the Nazis deported them against their will to Essen, not because they chose to labour under Allied bombs.

17. Bottom line is, the Nazis behaved in such a racist and antisemitic fashion from the get-go in all occupied territories that they rapidly escalated to killing Jews qua Jews, reducing the chance that Jews would die for purely war-related reasons. But Jews did die because of war-related reasons. It's not as simple as saying that 5.1-5.3 million Jews died in the Holocaust and the balance died in the war to a total of 6 million. 200-300,000 'war casualties' maybe. Which compared to the population loss of Belgium at 88,000 out of nearly 9 million, is quite high.

17. Any further questions, read and dissect the information found in this Wiki entry, and follow up with reading the relevant entries for the Holocaust in Austria through Yugoslavia.

OK, let's try again with smaller words:

Possible Fate of Jews in Europe During WWII: 1) Survive the war or 2) Murdered by the Nazis. True or False?
 
OK, let's try again with smaller words:

Possible Fate of Jews in Europe During WWII: 1) Survive the war or 2) Murdered by the Nazis. True or False?

3) Died of natural causes.
4) Died on the battlefield in combat
5) Died by accident/misadventure
6) Died of starvation/disease.
7) Migrated.
8) Were smuggled out by sympathisers.
9) Settled in other countries having been refugees there.

And so on.

Your possible Fate false dichotomy is false.
 
3) Died of natural causes.
4) Died on the battlefield in combat
5) Died by accident/misadventure
6) Died of starvation/disease.
7) Migrated.
8) Were smuggled out by sympathisers.
9) Settled in other countries having been refugees there.

And so on.

Your possible Fate false dichotomy is false.

Good. We have one person saying it's a false dichotomy. That's a start.
 
Unresponsive.

You accept Provan's experiment and have conceded you were flat out lying by saying that "Charles D Provan’s experiment demonstrated an average body of 0.07158 cubic meters" because it quite clearly demonstrated 18.2 bodies/cubic metres and not 13.97 bodies/cubic metre.

Your posts have produced contradictory figures re: Provan's experiment, Snakey. That's the bottom line. Either withdraw one of your posts or accept the fact that your credibility has just been shot to pieces.



This is babble, since Bay's experiment was used to establish one hypothetical possibility cross-checked with another arrived at by a different route.

Until you get it through your thick skull that Roberto Muehlenkamp used multiple methods to arrive at his estimates, then there is really nothing to discuss here.



This is also babble, since similar results were reached using another method.



Since Bay and Muehlenkamp spoke of bodies per cubic metres, kindly do the same and spare us the circumflex nonsense.



This is a load of unresponsive gibberish.



Oh pardon me, I forgot, you don't actually understand idiomatic English very well do you?



Provan's experiment shows that it is perfectly possible to achieve an average weight of less than 34kg per person just by rounding up some Americans in the 1990s. He himself was the first to note the fact that this corroborated Gerstein's testimony.

Roberto Muehlenkamp has taken what you call 'valid' and 'consistent' anthropological data to produce similar results by another means.

One might add that the data from Belsen survivors are significantly worse than the hypothesised figures for adults, as established in the British Medical Journal at the time.



You are still ignoring the fact that Roberto's average based on 2 adults and 1 child is reproduced by Provan's average based on 3 adults and 5 children.



Yes close. You've not demonstrated otherwise.



Contradicted by known data on decomposition as well as eyewitness accounts from the camps. You still haven't even begun to deal with this part of the argument.

[

Yes, you ignored the possibility that there are more graves on site, and you have ignored the fact that a small number of the deportees turned up dead elsewhere, before even reaching the camp.

So far you've done nothing to show that anyone deported to Belzec actually turned up anywhere else, which is strike 3 after failing to take into account decomposition (strike 2) and after obfuscating the evidence from Provan's experiment (strike 1).



Your English still sucks. Frankly, your grasp of English idiom is so poor that you communicate in a manner that antagonises native speakers as well as non-native speakers fluent in English.



Babble. All the participants in this discussion have been using bodies per cubic metre, the only reason you're not is because you intend to obfuscate the findings and blind people with pseudoscientific bullshaite.

And all of his point shaving reminds me of certain Apollo Hoaxers.

Even if he takes ALL of the numbers...average weight, speed of decomposition, etc., to the far end of the values HE thinks are acceptable, it is still just shaving percentage points.

So instead of being able to point at a pit that holds all 8,000 bodies, he can point at the pit and say it was only holding 6,000 of them. Whoopdee fracking woo. Only 6,000 bodies in a mass grave? That's not even a purge, much less a holocaust! /sarcasm.

And, yeah, that is still predicated on his absurd idea that in the middle of a fracking WORLD WAR you can track each and every human being on the planet and know whether they lived or died -- if the former, where they were living twenty years later, and if the latter, where they were buried.
 
OK, let's try again with smaller words:

Possible Fate of Jews in Europe During WWII: 1) Survive the war or 2) Murdered by the Nazis. True or False?
Definitely simple-minded, but he warned us he was thinking in that mode. Another egregiously false set-up: a dishonest choice, strawmanning again what historians of the Holocaust argue.

And how, according to our friend Herman Kruk, did Vilna ghetto Jews Herstl Lides and Yosef Gerstein die? And what happened during the war years to Yankl Polikanski, Elye Gejwusz, Hirsh Wituchowski, Leyb Gordzenski, and Yankl Avidon in Vilna? And which historians cover this up?
 
Last edited:
More than one, actually. Are you ever likely to make a point that is worth discussing or is your new ambition in life to argue worse than Clayton Moore?
Page 219 of this book http://books.google.com/books?id=ug...ed=0CDgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=trunk lodz&f=false (in fact, the entire chapter) serves as an example of how historians look at mortality during the war years, the table shown on page 219 giving the average number of deaths per 1000 in Lodz for the Jewish community in 1938 versus during the period of the ghetto. Needless to say, historians do not ignore natural deaths and pre-war mortality rates. In 1938, the table shows that out of a Jewish population of about 225,000, the number of deaths was 2,340, or 10.8 deaths per 1000. By contrast, in 1942, the "worst" year of the ghetto's existence, 18,117 people died in a Jewish community of 113,508, for a rate of 159.6 per 1000. In the remainer of the chapter Trunk shows how the causes of death skewed during the ghetto years, with, unsurprisingly, deaths from hunger and TB in particular skyrocketing.
 
Last edited:
It was a false dichotomy when you took it up, believing your strawman had legs, it is still a false dichotomy, and people are still scoffing at it.

And dammititall -- it's a holiday weekend and we're fresh out of Vicks Scoff Medicine...
 
7. The Nazis blamed "the Jews" for starting the war, in the most spectacular act of projection in human history.

8. Killing Jews became one of many Nazi war aims, and the one positive outcome Hitler could recall in his political testament written just before he blew his brains out.
Goebbels explained all this in his Das Reich article, The Jews Are Guilty, in November 1941 (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/goeb1.html):
Therefore, we must say again and yet again:

1. The Jews are our destruction. They started this war and direct it. They want to destroy the German Reich and our people. This plan must be blocked.

2. There are no distinctions between Jews. Each Jew is a sworn enemy of the German people. If he does not make his hostility plain, it is only from cowardice and slyness, not because he loves us.

3. The Jews are to blame for each German soldier who falls in this war. They have him on their conscience, and must also pay for it.

4. If someone wears the Jewish star, he is an enemy of the people. Anyone who deals with him is the same as a Jew and must be treated accordingly. He earns the contempt of the entire people, for he is a craven coward who leaves them in the lurch to stand by the enemy.

5. The Jews enjoy the protection of our enemies. That is all the proof we need to show how harmful they are for our people.

6. The Jews are the enemy's agents among us. He who stands by them aids the enemy.

7. The Jews have no right to claim equality with us. If they wish to speak on the streets, in lines outside shops or in public transportation, they should be ignored, not only because their are simply wrong, but because they are Jews who have no right to a voice in the community.

8. If the Jews appeal to your sentimentality, realize that they are hoping for your forgetfulness, and let them know that you see through them and hold them in contempt.

9. A decent enemy will deserve our generosity after we have won. The Jew however is not a decent enemy, though he tries to seem so.

10. The Jews are responsible for the war. The treatment they receive from us is hardly unjust. They have deserved it all.

It is the job of the government to deal with them. No one has the right to act on his own, but each has the duty to support the state's measures against the Jews, to defend them with others, and to avoid being misled by any Jewish tricks.

The security of the state requires that of us all.

Jeffrey Herf's book, The Jewish Enemy (http://books.google.com/books?id=T3...epage&q=jeffrey herf the jewish enemy&f=false) is a masterul study of the demented National Socialist ideology in this regard and its promotion by press, propaganda office, and Nazi leadership.
 
...Babble. All the participants in this discussion have been using bodies per cubic metre, the only reason you're not is because you intend to obfuscate the findings and blind people with pseudoscientific bullshaite.
He seems to have a habit of this, doesn't he? He never explained why it's impossible for a car made in the 30s or 40s to have an angled tailpipe, especially since we already know the car in question would have been modified.

What's a fantaist?
Someone who likes a brand of fruit-flavored soft drinks from Coca-Cola.

To be honest, it doesn't have the same ring as "Wouldn't you like to be a Pepper too?"

In all seriousness, the soda really was created due to supply problems in Nazi Germany, though the plant runners themselves didn't join the party. When they got back in contact with Coke HQ after the war, Coke found they had a new product.
 
No, I'm responding to somebody who thinks there's a relationship between the holocaust and World War II. Other than happening roughly at the same time and in the same place, there isn't. Jews didn't die in World War II. They died in the holocaust. I know it's a stupid concept but that's the holocaust for you.

You seem to be confused. So let's start at the beginning. Actually, let's just simplify the whole thing. True or False. The only possible fates for Jews living in the parts of Europe that were under Nazi occupation is 1) survive the war or 2) intentionally murdered by the Nazis as part of their plan to exterminate all the Jews in Europe except for the Jews they didn't want to exterminate? If the second option is too complex, feel free to break it down and tell me what parts are true and what aren't.

You either can't understand, or are trying to evade, so you're trying to change the debate to a point where you think your position is stronger. You had no problem responding to him until you realized he was going to keep asking you to provide evidence of your claim, so now you're trying to change the subject. And strawman/false dichotomy. It's cute how you think that we don't notice that in your proposition, only the second fate is open to questioning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom