Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[Scott Sommers]

Ivan Kragoff and his trio of super-apes could have easily pulled it off. Or is that one too many?

I don't think they need to be super-apes, although this certainly raises an important point. Let's ask Dr. Blevins if she thinks the apes need to be super or not.

But I do think that a monkey like this, perhaps aided by the supercomputer Dr. Blevins told us about, could be trained to handle the DEW. Don't you think so? We will be needing an expert opinion to solve some of these issues. Who would you suggest?

I certainly am glad to see this thread is making progress. We now have a clear idea of what really happened on 9/11. Using weapons that everybody knows about but refuse to admit exist, a small group of children, or perhaps even animals, was able to destabilize the nuclear structure of the WTC buildings and turn them into foam. This foam smells bad, and that's how we know that when the Deutsche Bank was fumigated in 2007, it had nothing to do with the fire that had almost burned down the building. We also know that the Sphere in Battery Park was transformed by the DEW weapon because it looks almost exactly the same as it did before the attack. And that's how the DEW weapons work when they're used by animal teams.

 

[dafydd]

Who is in charge of the sub orbital nebulizer?

Our best button presser.

 

[NoahFence]

hang on... i just noticed that they merged all her threads!

Maybe they should rename this to "The Dust Bin"???

 

[Stamuel]

What? There was NOTHING like this explosion of debris at the south face of WTC 2. What similarities do you see between this video and the videos of 9:03AM?

Among the similarities I alluded to are:

1. The plane completely penetrated the wall;
2. As it penetrated the wall, the part still outside appeared undamaged;
3. No part of the plane bounced off the wall;
4. The wings cut through the wall;
5. The wall around the impact was still there at the end.

These similarities seemed significant to me because the plane managed to cut through the wall like in the videos on 9/11 even though in this case the wall in the video is completely different from the WTC Tower walls. It was not made of hollow steel beams just over 1 foot across covered in aluminum with windows between. It was a block of concrete about 5 feet thick. Also the plane was clearly different, and was going slower (500 mph rather than 540mph). Given these differences, I thought the similarities were pretty striking.

Apparently, you were quite impressed at the cloud of pulverized concrete. I am not. WTC did not have concrete walls, and I do not expect steel and aluminum to turn to dust (and if I recall, you have said the same thing repeatedly). Also, in the video you posted, all the dust was traveling along the wall, with only a small component of its motion directed away from the wall. So the video shows we should not expect a cloud of debris to shoot backwards from the impact site. Further, since the WTC walls were much thinner with gaps for windows, debris would be much more able to go inside the building rather than being forced to travel along a thick concrete wall.

Your video does not show that a huge cloud of debris is the ultimate defining characteristic signature of plane impact. It does not even show that it is one defining characteristic out of many. The video may even be evidence that we need not expect such a cloud.

 

[tsig]

Ivan Kragoff and his trio of super-apes could have easily pulled it off. Or is that one too many?

If they were skunk apes that would explain the stench.

 

[BCR]

I only ask this because I am not clear on what type of "energy weapon" was used. I think most of you know that the reason particle beams and exotic such are not in use is because of air. When an "energy weapon" travels through air, it transfers a lot of its energy into those pesky air molecules along the way creating nice plasma effects and booms. Of course many can see this type of effect during a thunderstorm (we call it lightning). The "energy weapon" loses so much energy along the way it loses a lot of effectiveness in the atmosphere. Hence, the "star wars" stuff was designed to work in earth orbit to attack missiles/warheads that had to pass through their "airless" domain to reach their target.

So my question is, where are the lighting bolts coming down from heaven that destroyed the WTC? Just a nice little ionization trail would be nice to see. Perhaps this has been asked and answered already. If so, I apologize.

 

[minnemouse]

Who was manning the imaginary DEW then?

DUH!!! The cartoon figures, of course!!!!!

 

[minnemouse]

Because Dusty says so, she has a Ph.D and that entitles her to know this stuff.

Perhaps the "D" in PhD is "dust"? Pillaging and harvesting dust, fex?

 

[Scott Sommers]

DUH!!! The cartoon figures, of course!!!!!

I have been through this repeatedly. It was trained animals. The important question now is to uncover what kind of animals were used. This is a key point in uncovering the truth about the 9/11 attacks.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I have been through this repeatedly. It was trained animals. The important question now is to uncover what kind of animals were used. This is a key point in uncovering the truth about the 9/11 attacks.

I saw a video once where a guy explained that the NWO's underground cities were protected by genetically modified attack baboons. Could they be trained for the job?

 

[LSSBB]

I saw a video once where a guy explained that the NWO's underground cities were protected by genetically modified attack baboons. Could they be trained for the job?

Man, another leak! Who let this one out? Next they'll know about us sending our young 'uns out to mate with the surface dwellers and increase genetic diveristy.

(Kudos again to Harlan Ellison, "A Boy and his Dog"

 

[Dash80]

Meh... I guess Dusty and her foam ran away. No doubt she'll be back again some time trying to claim more ridiculous stuff. Perhaps she'll tell us her samples are actually cream.

______________
The World Trade Center did not collapse. It was turned into cream while it was standing there, and then the cream fell to the ground.

 

[George 152]

Perhaps the "D" in PhD is "dust"? Pillaging and harvesting dust, fex?

I thought the 'D' was for her drug taking

 

[SpitfireIX]

I have been through this repeatedly. It was trained animals. The important question now is to uncover what kind of animals were used. This is a key point in uncovering the truth about the 9/11 attacks.

No, you're all wrong. TruthersLie has convinced me beyond all doubt. It was Mothra.

 

[TjW]

I have been through this repeatedly. It was trained animals. The important question now is to uncover what kind of animals were used. This is a key point in uncovering the truth about the 9/11 attacks.

No, you're all wrong. TruthersLie has convinced me beyond all doubt. It was Mothra.

Can you prove Mothra wasn't trained?

 

[R.A.F.]

Meh... I guess Dusty and her foam ran away.

I wonder if it had anything to do with the merging of her threads?

 

[Drs_Res]

I'd say so. Her last activity was on the 24th and that was the day her threads were merged.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Our best button presser.

This guy:

"http://media.photobucket.com/image/marvin martian/MaxPower1272/martian.jpg?o=16" target="_blank"><img src="http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e172/MaxPower1272/martian.jpg" border="0"></a>

 

[MIKILLINI]

Meh... I guess Dusty and her foam ran away. No doubt she'll be back again some time trying to claim more ridiculous stuff. Perhaps she'll tell us her samples are actually cream.

______________
The World Trade Center did not collapse. It was turned into cream while it was standing there, and then the cream fell to the ground.

She's hurt by all the criticism of her outlandish theories; Theories so scatterbrained in logic, they follow no path of evidence or common sense. She wouldn't even acknowledge indisputable evidence. So immature...

I really wonder how she got that diploma...

 

[Scott Sommers]

No, you're all wrong. TruthersLie has convinced me beyond all doubt. It was Mothra.

I don't want to say this is wrong. I just want to urge caution in appealing to movie animals. Some of them are not even real and we would need further examination if an animal team like this was theorized. But I like all these theories. That's what science is about...testing theories...so the more theories we have to test, the more scientific things are.